Senate Signs Off on Local Lawsuits Measure
Changes made this week included expanding a list of circumstances in which local governments could not be held liable.
January 28, 2022 at 11:16 AM
3 minute read
LitigationDubbing it the "Local Business Protection Act," the Florida Senate on Thursday passed a controversial bill that could lead to businesses filing lawsuits against cities and counties. Senators voted 22-14 to approve the measure, which would allow businesses to sue local governments if ordinances cause at least 15 percent losses of profits.
"I think we are one of the most pro-business states in the entire nation, and I think this bill goes a lot further to separate us from the pack," sponsor Travis Hutson, R-St. Augustine, said.
Hutson this week made a series of changes to try to address opposition from cities and counties. But Senate critics said the measure could hamstring local officials from addressing problems in their communities and would drive up costs for cities and counties.
"Their money comes from one source — the taxpayers," Sen. Victor Torres, D-Kissimmee, said. "It would be more appropriate to call this bill the right to sue the taxpayer act."
The bill would apply to businesses that have been in operation for at least three years. It would allow them to file lawsuits seeking lost profits for seven years or the number of years the businesses have been in operation, whichever is less.
Changes that Hutson made this week included expanding a list of circumstances in which local governments could not be held liable. After the changes, cities and counties would be shielded from lawsuits about ordinances dealing with procurement and promoting economic competition. The bill already included exemptions for such things as ordinances that are needed to comply with state or federal laws or are related to the Florida Building Code or Florida Fire Prevention Code.
Also the changes included eliminating a proposed formula for amounts of attorney fees that cities and counties would have to pay if they lose lawsuits. After the change, the bill says judges "may award reasonable attorney fees and costs to the prevailing party."
Sen. Gary Farmer, D-Lighthouse Point, tried to add an exemption Thursday for ordinances dealing with affordable housing, but his proposal was rejected. Farmer pointed to the diversity of the state and said local governments need to be able to address problems.
"It's just a continuation of the assault on home rule," he said. "It's a continuation on our local communities' ability to really govern themselves in a way that's best for them."
But Hutson said the changes in the bill have given local governments "plenty of outs" and allows them to address issues.
The vote on the bill was nearly along party lines, with Sen. Jeff Brandes, R-St. Petersburg, crossing over to join Democrats in opposing it. A House version (HB 569) is pending in committees.
The bill had the backing of Senate President Wilton Simpson, a Trilby Republican, who said after the floor session that it could help stem "preemption" bills in the Legislature. Those bills involve the state taking power away from local governments on specific issues.
The Senate on Thursday also voted 28-8 to pass a related measure (SB 280) that includes requiring cities and counties to produce "business impact" estimates before passing ordinances. The House version of the bill (HB 403) has not been heard as the 60-day legislative session prepares to enter its fourth week.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllScammers Target Lawyers Across Country With Fake Court Notices
Miami Law's Class Action Forum to Feature Judges, New Rules, and Insights on MDL Practice
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250