'Don't Say Gay' Bill Supported in Senate
Sponsor Dennis Baxley, R-Ocala, characterized the bill as clarifying the lines of teachers' responsibilities in the classroom.
February 09, 2022 at 09:43 AM
5 minute read
Senators on Tuesday gave initial approval to a controversial proposal that critics have dubbed the "don't say gay" bill because it could curtail school discussions about sexual orientation and gender identity.
The Republican-dominated Senate Education Committee approved the measure (SB 1834) in a 6-3 vote along party lines, despite testimony from dozens of opponents who argued that the bill could remove teachers as a lifeline for vulnerable LGBTQ youths.
The bill would require that school districts "may not encourage" discussions related to sexual orientation and gender identity "in primary grade levels or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students."
Parents could file lawsuits against school districts for violations of the bill.
Sponsor Dennis Baxley, R-Ocala, characterized the bill as clarifying the lines of teachers' responsibilities in the classroom.
"Some discussions are for (having) with your parents. And I think when you start having sexual-type discussions with children, you're entering a very dangerous zone. Your awareness should pop up right away, this isn't teaching," Baxley said.
But John Harris Maurer, public policy director for LGBTQ-advocacy group Equality Florida, took exception to Baxley's argument that such discussions would be inherently sexual in nature.
"It is patently offensive to say that school discussions, even with young children, referring to two moms or two dads, parents like those that are sitting in this room that are your constituents … is somehow dangerous or inappropriate," Maurer said.
Democrats on the panel peppered Baxley with questions about what they described as vagueness in the bill.
Sen. Shevrin Jones, a West Park Democrat who is gay, argued that the bill's reference to "primary grade levels" could conflict with an assertion by Baxley that it would apply only to kindergarten through third-grade.
Baxley also argued that the measure would not affect private conversations between teachers and individual students but would only deal with "procedures" and "curriculum" in a classroom.
Sen. Tina Polsky, D-Boca Raton, argued the bill's wording did not align with Baxley's description of how it would be applied.
"So, I think the challenge here (is) when you put words on paper in a bill, it makes it really difficult to distinguish between private discussions as a friend with a teacher and what you're saying, they have to call the parent or they're going to get sued," Polsky said. "I would encourage a look back at these words, because I don't think it's making it clear what you're trying to get at." Incoming Senate President Kathleen Passidomo, R-Naples, questioned the part of the bill that would allow parents to sue school districts over violations.
Passidomo, who will become president in November, asked Baxley if he is willing to change the bill from allowing lawsuits to enforcement being based on complaints that could ultimately lead to investigations and fines for school districts.
"I'm very interested in whatever kind of enforcement mechanism would be best," Baxley replied. Other parts of the bill are aimed at ensuring parents are informed of any changes to students' services or monitoring of students' mental or physical health.
The bill is a continuation of Republicans' push to increase parental involvement in issues related to education. Lawmakers last year passed a bill known as the "Parents' Bill of Rights," which served in part as the basis for an executive order by Gov. Ron DeSantis aimed at prohibiting mask mandates in schools.
DeSantis this week signaled his support for the so-called "don't say gay" bill.
"My goal is to educate kids on the subjects, math, reading, science, all the things that are so important. I don't want the schools to kind of be a playground for ideological disputes," DeSantis said during a press event in Bartow on Tuesday.
Parental rights in education also has become a political flashpoint nationally and played a key role in Republican Glenn Youngkin's election last year as governor of Virginia, which Baxley referenced during discussion on the bill.
"The reason that this is in such a feverish pitch, is just what you saw in Virginia when under all this stuff with (parents) being a lot more involved in (their) kids' school activity and work in response to the pandemic, they found out they're being left out of the equation. And there's new ideas and new things being planted that they don't even know about," Baxley said. "When they get a statement … from the leadership saying they have no business with what we do in schools … that's when it explodes. That's when moms show up and pack rooms."
A similar House measure (HB 1557) has advanced through the Education & Employment Committee and needs approval from the Judiciary Committee before it could go to the House floor.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
St. Thomas University Settles With Fired Professor Who Had Alleged Academic Freedom Violations and Discrimination
9 minute readEx-St. Thomas Univ. Law Professor Sues School Over Firing, Alleging Defamation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Vedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
- 2Wells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
- 3Legaltech Rundown: Robin AI Releases In-house Tool, Epona Merges With JustiSolutions, and More
- 4As Lawmakers Eye Need for NY Supreme Court Posts, Could a Ballot Question Remove the Constitutional Limit?
- 5State Appellate Court Rejects Reasoning for Attorney's Removal From Conservatorship
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250