Peloton's Wild Stock Ride Makes M&A Bit More Tricky
Peloton was a darling of investors early in the pandemic when fitness fans, cooped up at home, flocked to its sleek gadgets and subscription services.
February 09, 2022 at 01:57 PM
3 minute read
Wild swings in Peloton Interactive Inc.'s stock price and a "factory reset" of the exercise-bike maker's business have left investors scratching their heads over how much the stock is worth and what price a prospective buyer would need to pay to acquire the one-time pandemic star.
The unprofitable maker of $2,000-plus web-connected stationary bikes saw its shares soar more than 50% in the last two days, fired up by reports of takeover interest and Tuesday's wholesale changes at its organization. The overhaul left analysts divided over whether Barry McCarthy's appointment as chief executive officer will increase or decrease the likelihood of a sale, with Barclays Plc analysts saying Peloton shares were at "day 0 of factory reset."
The deal most comparable to Peloton is Lululemon Athletica Inc.'s $500 million deal for Mirror in 2020, according to special situations research firm United First Partners, which was priced at 3.9 times Lululemon's projection of the target's 2021 revenue. At that multiple, Peloton would fetch about $51 per share, United First said Tuesday. That's 37% above Tuesday's close of $37.27 and more than double the price Friday before the reports of M&A interest.
Still, that would be a big comedown from the stock's 2021 high above $167. Peloton was a darling of investors during the pandemic when fitness fans, cooped up at home, flocked to its sleek gadgets and subscription services. The shares tumbled 86% from the peak as the outbreak eased, sending customers back to their reopened gyms. The stock recovered some ground this week after reports that Amazon.com Inc. and Nike Inc. were interested in a potential acquisition.
"You think you know what things look like, but then that will change on a dime with the latest headline," said Matt Miskin, co-chief investment strategist at John Hancock Investment Management. "How do you invest on that?"
In another similar deal, Google parent Alphabet Inc. paid a roughly 70% premium for Fitbit, which would imply a price of more than $40 a share for Peloton based on Friday's closing price.
The rally of the past two days probably was driven in part by short sellers buying back stock after the reports of M&A interest. Almost 13% of the shares available for trading had been sold short as of Monday, according to IHS Markit Ltd.
Peloton now sells at less than three times estimated sales, cheaper than the Nasdaq 100 Index's 4.6 times. A majority on Wall Street still remain bullish on the stock, with more than half of analysts tracked by Bloombeg rating the company a buy and the average price target of $42.81 implying a 15% gain from current levels.
Still, price targets are all over the place. Mario Lu at Barclays lowered his forecast Wednesday to $60 from $90, while Telsey Advisory Group's Dana Telsey raised hers to $40 from $30. Peloton's second-quarter revenue missed estimates and the company again lowered its forecast for 2022.
The recent underperformance of the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 Index has supressed the valuation premium of the index relative to the S&P 500 Index. Still, the Nasdaq 100 remains pricey trading at a 27% premium to the S&P 500, well above its five-year average.
Jeran Wittenstein and Thyagaraju Adinarayan report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$1,575 Daily Interest Is Being Added in This Landmark Miami Case
Disney's Black Eye Over Arbitration Gambit Likely to Linger, Underscoring PR Risks of Spurning Courts
Sports Law Veteran Returns to Tampa Bay Bucs, This Time as CLO
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250