Peloton's Wild Stock Ride Makes M&A Bit More Tricky
Peloton was a darling of investors early in the pandemic when fitness fans, cooped up at home, flocked to its sleek gadgets and subscription services.
February 09, 2022 at 01:57 PM
3 minute read
Wild swings in Peloton Interactive Inc.'s stock price and a "factory reset" of the exercise-bike maker's business have left investors scratching their heads over how much the stock is worth and what price a prospective buyer would need to pay to acquire the one-time pandemic star.
The unprofitable maker of $2,000-plus web-connected stationary bikes saw its shares soar more than 50% in the last two days, fired up by reports of takeover interest and Tuesday's wholesale changes at its organization. The overhaul left analysts divided over whether Barry McCarthy's appointment as chief executive officer will increase or decrease the likelihood of a sale, with Barclays Plc analysts saying Peloton shares were at "day 0 of factory reset."
The deal most comparable to Peloton is Lululemon Athletica Inc.'s $500 million deal for Mirror in 2020, according to special situations research firm United First Partners, which was priced at 3.9 times Lululemon's projection of the target's 2021 revenue. At that multiple, Peloton would fetch about $51 per share, United First said Tuesday. That's 37% above Tuesday's close of $37.27 and more than double the price Friday before the reports of M&A interest.
Still, that would be a big comedown from the stock's 2021 high above $167. Peloton was a darling of investors during the pandemic when fitness fans, cooped up at home, flocked to its sleek gadgets and subscription services. The shares tumbled 86% from the peak as the outbreak eased, sending customers back to their reopened gyms. The stock recovered some ground this week after reports that Amazon.com Inc. and Nike Inc. were interested in a potential acquisition.
"You think you know what things look like, but then that will change on a dime with the latest headline," said Matt Miskin, co-chief investment strategist at John Hancock Investment Management. "How do you invest on that?"
In another similar deal, Google parent Alphabet Inc. paid a roughly 70% premium for Fitbit, which would imply a price of more than $40 a share for Peloton based on Friday's closing price.
The rally of the past two days probably was driven in part by short sellers buying back stock after the reports of M&A interest. Almost 13% of the shares available for trading had been sold short as of Monday, according to IHS Markit Ltd.
Peloton now sells at less than three times estimated sales, cheaper than the Nasdaq 100 Index's 4.6 times. A majority on Wall Street still remain bullish on the stock, with more than half of analysts tracked by Bloombeg rating the company a buy and the average price target of $42.81 implying a 15% gain from current levels.
Still, price targets are all over the place. Mario Lu at Barclays lowered his forecast Wednesday to $60 from $90, while Telsey Advisory Group's Dana Telsey raised hers to $40 from $30. Peloton's second-quarter revenue missed estimates and the company again lowered its forecast for 2022.
The recent underperformance of the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 Index has supressed the valuation premium of the index relative to the S&P 500 Index. Still, the Nasdaq 100 remains pricey trading at a 27% premium to the S&P 500, well above its five-year average.
Jeran Wittenstein and Thyagaraju Adinarayan report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Lawyer Turned Emmy-Winning Comedian is Headlining at the Broward Center for the Performing Arts
4 minute readHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Balch & Bingham Elects New Partners, Adds Litigator From Jones Walker
- 2People in the News—Jan. 16, 2025—McGuireWoods, High Swartz
- 3'Pushed Into Oncoming Traffic': $5.85M Settlement in Mediated Auto Tort
- 4The Marble Palace Blog: Supreme Court Books You Should Read in 2025
- 5Avoiding Legal Risks: Crafting a Strong Do Not Call Policy for Compliance
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250