Boeing 787 Stays Under FAA Oversight for Factory-Quality Checks
Boeing revealed with its earnings last month that it faces $5.5 billion in total costs to inspect and repair Dreamliners and compensate customers for lost flying, wiping out its profits for the aircraft.
February 15, 2022 at 02:07 PM
3 minute read
Boeing Co.'s 787 Dreamliner suffered a new blow as U.S. regulators said they would step up inspections of each jet before delivery.
The Federal Aviation Administration said in an emailed statement that it is taking the action to "allow the agency to confirm the effectiveness of measures Boeing has undertaken to improve the 787 manufacturing process."
Since 2020, the company has grappled with structural glitches that have turned its popular wide-body jet into a drain on cash. More than 110 of the carbon-fiber aircraft have been built but left undelivered while the issues are resolved.
The FAA is imposing the same authority it invoked earlier on the 737 Max by insisting that its own safety inspectors conduct reviews of each jet before they can be sold to customers, indicating the agency lacks confidence in Boeing's manufacturing processes.
The action is the latest highlighting tensions between the aircraft manufacturer and its regulator. The two tangled for months over how to redesign the 737 Max following two fatal crashes and the quality of the plane's construction, and the FAA has issued several civil fines against the company.
Boeing stock had climbed 4.3% this year through Monday while the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 4.9%.
"We respect the FAA's role as our regulator and we will continue to work transparently through their detailed and rigorous processes," the company said in an emailed statement.
Boeing revealed with its earnings last month that it faces $5.5 billion in total costs to inspect and repair Dreamliners and compensate customers for lost flying, wiping out its profits for the aircraft. The planemaker hasn't handed over any of the marquee wide-body jets since June as Boeing and its suppliers grapple with tiny structure imperfections that have cropped up around the jet's air frame.
The Chicago-based company expects to spend around $2 billion to repair the 110 or so undelivered Dreamliners that have stacked up around its factories and in storage yards and signaled that the work will extend through the end of next year. While Boeing hasn't said when it expects to restart 787 deliveries, most suppliers don't expect that to occur until the third quarter, according to analyst Ken Herbert of RBC Capital Markets.
The latest issue revolves around what is known as an "airworthiness certificate." In addition to FAA's authority over aircraft designs, the agency also is responsible for signing off on each individual aircraft coming off the assembly line to ensure it meets quality levels and was built as designed.
Traditionally, the FAA has allowed companies such as Boeing to delegate its own employees to conduct such inspections, but in recent years the agency has insisted on using its own safety inspectors.
The agency said it would continue the inspections until it is confident manufacturing processes "consistently produce 787s that meet FAA design standards" and Boeing develops a plan to rebuild planes in storage. The FAA said it also wants to ensure the company's "delivery processes are stable."
The FAA on Jan. 11, 2021, notified Boeing it was going to use its safety inspectors to examine four 787s to assess quality issues on the jet, but Tuesday's announcement was the first time the agency said it would conduct all such inspections.
Alan Levin and Julie Johnsson report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecurities Claims Against Lilium N.V. for Electric Plane Production Delays Fail to Take Flight, Federal Judge Holds
5 minute readFamily Sues United Airlines After Miscommunication Leads to 'Near Death' Dive Toward Ocean
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Offices & Dragons
- 2Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 3Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 4Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 5Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250