Shell and BP to Stop Buying Russian Oil and Gas
There are risks to the move, with Shell warning that its refineries might end up producing less fuel.
March 08, 2022 at 03:01 PM
4 minute read
Shell Plc and BP Plc said they won't make any new purchases of Russian oil and gas, but won't be able to immediately to disentangle themselves from the country due to long-term contracts and the likely difficulty of finding alternative supplies.
The announcements, which for Shell mark a dramatic U-turn in response to international opprobrium for its purchase of Russian crude last week, accelerates energy companies' rejection of Russia over its invasion of Ukraine.
Yet it also highlights the risks of the move, with Shell warning that its refineries might end up producing less fuel. BP warned that it could have to backtrack on its pledge if security of energy supply was threatened.
"There is no easy fix to replace these Russian barrels,"said Keshav Lohiya, founder of consultant Oilytics Ltd. "With crude inventories already running low, reduced refinery runs might be the only solution."
Last week, Shell drew heavy criticism for buying a cargo of Russian crude. Ukraine's Minister for Foreign Affairs Dmytro Kuleba took to Twitter to ask the company whether the oil smelled like "Ukrainian blood for you?"
"We are acutely aware that our decision last week to purchase a cargo of Russian crude oil" was wrong, the company said in a statement on Tuesday. "Our actions to date have been guided by continuous discussions with governments about the need to disentangle society from Russian energy flows."
Shell said it could take weeks to remove Russian crude oil from its expansive network and will result in lower output of fuels at some of its refineries where alternatives are not so readily available. That comes as diesel markets are already in crisis mode as traders tried to make sense of the magnitude of supply shortfalls due to the Russia crisis.
Ending the company's use of refined oil and natural gas supplies from the country "will take much longer" because it represents such a "complex challenge," according to the statement.
The invasion of Ukraine prompted a huge range of companies to withdraw from their operations in Russia, including energy giants BP Plc and Exxon Mobil Corp. Attention has now shifted to the country's energy exports, a crucial source of revenue for President Vladimir Putin's government.
In the U.S., key lawmakers announced the outline of bipartisan legislation to bar imports of Russian oil into the U.S. Europe, which is more dependent on the country's crude, have so far shied away from a ban, but pressure is growing on companies that continue to receive the country's energy exports.
BP was less emphatic than Shell in its intention to phase out Russian energy supplies. A spokesman said the company "will continue to meet existing contractual obligations subject to meeting sanctions, security, and shipping requirements and where it is safe to do so."
It also said that it would not charter Russian-owned, operated or flagged vessels "where possible." BP could, however, enter into new business with Russia if it was "essential for ensuring security of supply."
Shell will also shut its service stations, aviation fuels and lubricants operations in Russia.
TotalEnergies SE Chief Executive Officer Patrick Pouyanne said on Monday that his company's trading arm had already stopped buying Russian oil, but one its refineries in Germany would continue to receive crude from the country because there was no alternative supply. The company is the only western oil major to not pull its investments from Russia, opting instead to pause capital spending on new projects there.
Engie SA CEO Catherine MacGregor said in a Bloomberg TV interview on Tuesday her company continues to buy Russian gas because its customers depend on those supplies.
Even without direct Western sanctions on Russian energy exports, the risk that buyers will voluntarily shun the country's supplies have triggered unprecedented surges in crude and natural gas prices. The International Energy Agency, which already announced the release of 60 million barrels of oil from emergency stockpiles, is prepared to recommend that its members release more if necessary, Executive Director Fatih Birol said in an interview on Bloomberg.
James Herron and Laura Hurst report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readThe Inflation Reduction Act: Evaluating Its Impact on Renewable Energy Producers and Analyzing Emerging Needs
Caribbean Energy Needs Are on the Rise, and Plenty of That Work is Headed For U.S. Law Firms
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250