Firms Must Report Hacks to DHS in 72 Hours Under Law
President Joe Biden's sweeping cybersecurity legislation is expected to give U.S. officials deeper insight into the nature of global hacking.
March 16, 2022 at 12:54 PM
4 minute read
The $1.5 trillion government funding package that President Joe Biden recently signed includes sweeping cybersecurity legislation that will require critical infrastructure operators to quickly report data breaches and ransomware payments.
The new law mandates that companies report hacks to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security within 72 hours of discovery of the incident, and 24 hours if they make a ransomware payment. FBI officials last year estimated that the bureau has visibility into a quarter of cyber incidents, resulting in a governmentwide lack of information about the nature of many data breaches, the tactics of cybercriminals and the U.S. industries that are most vulnerable.
The law's mandatory requirement is expected to give U.S. officials deeper insight into the nature of global hacking.
The legislation positions DHS's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency as a central hub for receiving private sector incident response reports, sharing threat data and tracking the evolution of ransomware, a pernicious issue for American business that has been difficult to quantify. Victims reported $29 million in ransomware-related losses to the FBI in 2020, the most recent figures available, compared to $406 million in extortion payments observed by the cryptocurrency-tracking firm Chainalysis Inc. during the same year.
CISA Director Jen Easterly praised the Senate's passage of the bill, saying it gives her agency "the data and visibility we need to help better protect critical infrastructure and businesses across the country from the devastating effects of cyberattacks."
"Put plainly, this legislation is a game changer," Easterly said.
The agency lists 16 broad sectors spanning health, energy, food and transportation as critical to the U.S., although the new legislation is yet to spell out precisely which companies would be required to report cyber incidents.
CISA has not said how it will use data gleaned from breach reports, but has been seeking to build its capabilities and work more closely with the private sector on a voluntary basis. In recent months, it has established emergency real-time Slack channels to swap information on hacks with affected companies.
CISA also is funding the Cyber Safety Review Board, an advisory body created this year to study major cyber incidents with the hope of minimizing the fallout from future attacks.
Brock Dahl, cybersecurity counsel at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, said the legislation was well-intentioned, though cautioned that it would take time for specific regulations to come into focus.
"There is already a vehicle for sharing information with DHS, but there's never been any significant motivation for voluntarily sharing that threat information," said Dahl, formerly deputy general counsel at the National Security Agency.
"The current impact of the legislation also remains unclear due to lack of definition over exactly which companies will fall under the reporting requirements, which will be clarified in regulation," he said, adding it was unclear what obligations this placed on the federal government to help combat the ransomware scourge and whether companies would get valuable information back.
Top Justice Department officials, meanwhile, have expressed concern that the bill gives investigators less insight into potential cybercrime because companies don't have to directly report intrusions to federal law enforcement.
"In its current form, it would make the public less safe from cyber threats — slowing aid to victims, hampering identification of other companies the same attackers are targeting, and undercutting disruption operations against cyber threats," FBI Director Chris Wray said of the bill in a statement to Politico.
In a series of tweets, CISA Director Jen Easterly pledged to share relevant details with law enforcement "immediately."
The law also comes into effect as U.S. firms, particularly in the financial sector, are bracing for potential blowback in cyberspace stemming from Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and the sanctions levied on Moscow as punishment.
"While there are no specific or credible cyber threats to the U.S. at this time, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which has involved cyber-attacks on Ukrainian government and critical infrastructure organizations, could impact organizations both within and beyond the region, to include the U.S. homeland," CISA warned. "Every organization — large and small — must be prepared to respond to disruptive cyber activity."
Jack Gillum and Katrina Manson report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Lawyers Speak Out: 'The President Had the Confidence to Retain Me'
FTC Receiver Eyes Fraudulent Messages Ecommerce Company's Clients
'Rapidly Closing Window': Progressive Groups Urge Senate Votes on Biden's Judicial Nominees
5 minute readBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250