Fox Betting Plan Stalls as Murdoch Wrestles With FanDuel Parent
The poor performance of Fox Bet is a problem for Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch, who calls sports betting a "huge opportunity" for his company.
March 16, 2022 at 12:16 PM
4 minute read
Fox Corp.'s plan to be a major player in sports betting has hit a snag with the fledgling sports betting site Fox Bet struggling and the company failing to resolve ongoing ownership issues with its partner Flutter Entertainment Plc.
The 3-year-old site, heavily promoted on Fox TV networks, is only available in four states, and Fox Chief Executive Officer Lachlan Murdoch said he's unhappy with the progress.
"We don't control it — because we're not allowed to," Murdoch said at an investor conference on March 10. "It's only rolled out in four states, which we're disappointed in, and we'd like to see it rolled out in many more."
Sports betting has exploded in the U.S. since the Supreme Court permitted its expansion in 2018, and 30 states now offer it. But some operators are having a hard time gaining traction in the already crowded field. Golden Nugget Online Gaming Inc. is selling itself to DraftKings Inc. Caesars Entertainment Inc. and Wynn Resorts Ltd. have sharply cut back on their marketing spending as they look to find profitability.
The relationship between Fox, the TV company controlled by the Murdoch family, and Flutter, a large Irish bookmaker, is a complicated one. It began when Flutter bought the Stars Group, the online betting company that created Fox Bet with Murdoch, in 2019.
Flutter now owns Fox Bet, and Fox has an option to acquire 50% of that business. But Flutter already has a large and industry-leading sports betting site in FanDuel. Fox Bet has less than 1% of the U.S. online sports betting business outside of Nevada, compared with 40% for FanDuel, according to Vixio GamblingCompliance.
"FanDuel has been so phenomenally successful it's hard not to make the argument for investing more into that brand, especially in such a competitive market, rather than spreading any investment across a dual-brand strategy," said James Kilsby, an analyst who follows the industry at Vixio.
Fox also has an option to purchase 18.6% of FanDuel. The parties can't agree on a price to exercise that option, however, and they're set to go into arbitration in June.
The poor performance of Fox Bet is a problem for Murdoch, who calls sports betting a "huge opportunity" for his company, which is much smaller now after selling the bulk of its entertainment assets to Walt Disney Co. Fox had previously utilized its U.K. TV business to create Sky Bet, which was sold to Stars Group for $4.7 billion in 2018.
The Fox Bet brand launched in 2019 with much buzz in the sports betting world, given its pedigree, but its technology has lagged, according to Steven Ruddock, senior analyst at Wagers.com, a website that tracks the industry.
The app is "operating on what can best be described as a legacy platform that hasn't received the updates required to compete in the U.S.," Ruddock said.
Fox airs the TV show "Fox Bet Live" on its FS1 network. The company has used on-air personalities such as Terry Bradshaw and Clint Bowyer to promote Fox Bet. It's deployed Fox Bet Super 6, a free-to-play contest touted during NFL games, as a way to acquire some 6 million potential betting customers.
Murdoch said he could envision a scenario where Fox would be licensed by gambling regulators to own a significant stake in a betting business, but he didn't think the company would operate such a business.
Fox is "in active conversations with Flutter in terms of our relationship and how we handle it going forward," he said.
Flutter Chief Executive Officer Peter Jackson said on a March 1 earnings call that the company has had talks with Fox to resolve the issue of its option to invest in FanDuel but hasn't reached any agreement.
"If we can't get the deal that's right for our shareholders, we're very comfortable going to arbitration," Jackson said.
The companies declined further comment.
Christopher Palmeri and Thomas Seal report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readDeal Watch: Are Only 'A Handful' of Law Firms Positioned Well After Citi-Apollo Partnership?
5 minute readLawyers Eye Expected Rate Cut, Expecting Large Cap M&A Boost as a Result
4 minute readAfter Unanticipated Slow Start of Year, Law Firms Are Left Waiting For M&A Rebound
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 2Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 3Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 4UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 5Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250