US Firms Warn Saudis New Data Law Could Hit Investment
Saudi Arabia issued a draft of its personal data protection law, which in its current form prevents the transfer of personal data outside the kingdom without any individual exemptions.
March 16, 2022 at 12:41 PM
3 minute read
The largest business lobbying group in the U.S. has warned Saudi Arabia that a new privacy and data law will raise the cost of doing business in the kingdom and complicate efforts to attract foreign investors and wean its economy off a dependence on oil sales.
Saudi Arabia in September issued a draft of its personal data protection law, known as PDPL, which in its current form prevents the transfer of personal data outside the kingdom without any individual exemptions. Companies that don't comply face criminal sanctions, according to a letter sent by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce earlier this year and seen by Bloomberg.
"There are several aspects of this law that pose not only significant problems for the private sector but will be significant barriers to helping the Kingdom achieve its goal to become a digital hub," the group, which represents more than 3 million businesses, said in the letter. "It will have a major impact on the cost and ability to do business in the Kingdom."
Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is looking to attract more foreign investors as part of an ambitious plan to diversify the economy away from oil. It's vying with other financial centers in the region such as Dubai and Abu Dhabi to become the Gulf's premier business hub.
But foreign investment has remained low, and the data law is the latest example of local rules hitting international firms looking to do business in the country. The U.S. embassy last year warned that a series of tax disputes with Saudi authorities could deter foreign firms from doing more business in the kingdom, while long-running payment issues for contractors doing business with the government have also soured attitudes.
The Saudi Authority for Data and Artificial Intelligence didn't respond to a request for comment.
Tech firms, banks and payment firms are among the companies that have expressed concern about the new data law, people familiar with the matter said. The law as it is written would mean that international firms would have to duplicate all their global data handling locally.
"Given the importance of this regulation, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce appreciates the many productive and positive discussions we have organized to date with Saudi officials," said Steve Lutes, vice president for Middle East affairs. "We look forward to continuing to engage and share our feedback and recommendations later this month on the executive regulations of Saud's Personal Data Protection Law."
The law may not only hurt smaller business because they face higher costs but also raises fresh cybersecurity concerns, according to the U.S. lobby group. Providers of cloud services combat cyberattacks through a global network and if the Saudi government shuts off cloud services from outside the country, then the risk of attacks might worsen.
"Data localization requirements will impose substantial costs on all companies doing business in Saudi Arabia without increasing security," the business group's letter said. "Localization will raise the cost of data storage and cloud-based services in the Kingdom and maintaining separate local servers may not be possible or practical given current network architecture."
Nicolas Parasie, Matthew Martin and Ben Bartenstein report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
2 minute readCrypto Entrepreneur Claims Justice Department’s Software Crackdown Violates US Constitution
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250