Signet Shocks Diamond Trade With Refusal to Buy Russian Gems
The move by Signet, the owner of Kay Jewelers and Zales, is the latest step in companies self-sanctioning and going further than government restrictions as Russia's invasion of Ukraine raises concerns about a consumer backlash.
March 17, 2022 at 01:28 PM
3 minute read
Mining and ResourcesSignet Jewelers Ltd., the owner of Kay Jewelers and Zales, sent shock waves through the global diamond trade, telling suppliers it would no longer buy stones mined in Russia.
That goes further than President Joe Biden's decree on Friday, when he announced a ban on the import of Russian diamonds. The announcement initially shocked the industry, until the small print showed the ban only impacted rough diamonds.
Very few rough diamonds are shipped to the U.S. Most end up in India, via trading hubs in Belgium and Dubai, where they are cut, polished and set in jewelry before being shipped around the world. Those goods were not impacted by Biden's decree.
Signet went much further, sending a memo telling suppliers it will stop buying diamonds and precious metals that originate in Russia. Russia vies with Botswana as the world's biggest diamond producer, supplying almost a third of all stones by volume.
"Signet has therefore halted all trade in precious metals and diamonds that originate from such sanctioned Russian sources, and you are therefore requested to stop supplying the same to Signet even though the country(s) in which you operate may not have imposed sanctions on Russian precious metals and diamonds," Signet said in the memo.
A spokesman for Signet wasn't immediately available for comment.
Russia's Alrosa PJSC produces about the same amount of gems as De Beers, the iconic diamond company that had a monopoly until the start of this century.
Signet's move is the latest step in companies self-sanctioning and going further than government restrictions as Russia's invasion of Ukraine raises concerns about a consumer backlash.
While that threatens to upend supply chains, Signet has added caveats to stop an immediate crunch. In the memo, the company said its block applies to goods purchased after Feb. 24, the date Russia invaded Ukraine. The diamond industry has a long supply chain, with many months between buying rough stones to finally handing over finished goods to retailers.
The diamond industry's ability to satisfy Signet's demand is also in question. Most diamonds change hands multiple times in the supply chain, being passed from traders to cutters and polishers and manufacturers, and stones are often traded several times in between each step. Diamonds are also routinely mixed into parcels of similar sizes and qualities making origin tracking almost impossible in many cases.
Thomas Biesheuvel reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLithium Resumes Insane Gains to Add Pressure on Automakers
Trending Stories
- 1Supreme Court of Georgia Disbars 1, Reinstates 1
- 2New York City’s Failure to Pay Its Bills Is Putting Vulnerable New Yorkers in the Crosshairs
- 3Immigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
- 4Justice on the Move: The Impact of 'Bristol-Myers Squibb' on FLSA Forum-Shopping
- 5Wachtell Helps Miami Dolphins Secure One of NFL’s First Private Equity Deals
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250