Could Statute of Limitations Issues Thwart Trump's Suit Against Hillary Clinton Over Russia Collusion Allegations?
There is one immediate problem with the lawsuit: The U.S. Supreme Court has held that civil RICO claims are subject to a four-year statute of limitations. That means defendants will likely challenge certain counts on the grounds of timeliness.
March 24, 2022 at 07:53 PM
3 minute read
A South Florida law firm filed a lawsuit in a federal court in Fort Pierce on Thursday against nearly 50 people and entities that allegedly conspired to undermine its client, former president Donald J. Trump, in his 2016 campaign by falsely tying him to Russia.
Peter Ticktin, a partner at Ticktin Law Group in Deerfield Beach, Florida, alleged the defendants "maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent, Donald J. Trump, was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty."
However, there could be one immediate problem with the lawsuit: the U.S. Supreme Court has held that civil RICO claims are subject to a four-year statute of limitations. That means defendants will likely challenge certain counts on the grounds of timeliness.
But Ticktin, who represents Donald J. Trump, pointed to top-level officials in Hillary Clinton's campaign, the Democratic Nomination Convention and the law firm, Perkins Coie, in carrying out the alleged scheme that required the former president to shell out millions of dollars to defend. Trump also accused defendants of obstructing justice and stealing trade secrets, along with unlawful hacking into his private communications.
"The actions taken in furtherance of their scheme—falsifying evidence, deceiving law enforcement, and exploiting access to highly-sensitive data sources—are so outrageous, subversive and incendiary that even the events of Watergate pale in comparison," Trump said in the lawsuit.
Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer, is also named in the lawsuit for compiling the dossier that the FBI and media outlets allegedly circulated before the November 2016 election.
"They worked together with a single, self-serving purpose: to vilify Donald J. Trump," the lawsuit claimed. "Indeed, their far-reaching conspiracy was designed to cripple Trump's bid for presidency by fabricating a scandal that would be used to trigger an unfounded federal investigation and ignite a media frenzy."
The lawsuit regurgitates public statements that the former president has proclaimed in the public, such as at political rallies and outside the White House nearby Marine One, over the past five years. The lawsuit included details John Durham unearthed in his ongoing investigation as special counsel into the 2016 campaign, as well as former special counsel Robert Mueller.
Now, Trump is seeking to recover more than $72 million in damages—an amount that is triple the $24 million in legal fees—in the 16-count lawsuit that will be heard before U.S. District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks, who sits in the Southern District of Florida.
Trump is suing under RICO, RICO conspiracy, injurious falsehood, conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood, malicious prosecution, computer fraud and abuse act, theft of trade secrets, conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood, agency, and multiple counts of respondeat superior.
Read the complaint:
Trump noted that "when their gambit failed," and he was elected, the defendants continued their focus to undermine his presidential administration.
He added, "The deception, malice, and treachery perpetrated by the defendants has caused significant harm to the American people, and to the plaintiff, Donald J. Trump, and they must be held accountable for their heinous acts."
Sign up for Law.com Radar to keep up with the latest news and lawsuits in a personalized legal news feed. Track federal litigation, deals and who's getting the work by industry, practice area and region.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllU.S. Eleventh Circuit Remands Helms-Burton Trafficking Case Involving Confiscated Cuban Port
3 minute readMiami Lawyer Guilty of Indirect Criminal Contempt But Dodges Paying Legal Fees
4 minute readShareholder Claims Next Science Sold Risky Product Despite Knowing the Dangers
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250