![APTOPIX 2016 Election Trump](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2022/03/AP_16314319459998-767x633.jpg)
Could Statute of Limitations Issues Thwart Trump's Suit Against Hillary Clinton Over Russia Collusion Allegations?
There is one immediate problem with the lawsuit: The U.S. Supreme Court has held that civil RICO claims are subject to a four-year statute of limitations. That means defendants will likely challenge certain counts on the grounds of timeliness.
March 24, 2022 at 07:53 PM
3 minute read
A South Florida law firm filed a lawsuit in a federal court in Fort Pierce on Thursday against nearly 50 people and entities that allegedly conspired to undermine its client, former president Donald J. Trump, in his 2016 campaign by falsely tying him to Russia.
Peter Ticktin, a partner at Ticktin Law Group in Deerfield Beach, Florida, alleged the defendants "maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent, Donald J. Trump, was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty."
However, there could be one immediate problem with the lawsuit: the U.S. Supreme Court has held that civil RICO claims are subject to a four-year statute of limitations. That means defendants will likely challenge certain counts on the grounds of timeliness.
But Ticktin, who represents Donald J. Trump, pointed to top-level officials in Hillary Clinton's campaign, the Democratic Nomination Convention and the law firm, Perkins Coie, in carrying out the alleged scheme that required the former president to shell out millions of dollars to defend. Trump also accused defendants of obstructing justice and stealing trade secrets, along with unlawful hacking into his private communications.
"The actions taken in furtherance of their scheme—falsifying evidence, deceiving law enforcement, and exploiting access to highly-sensitive data sources—are so outrageous, subversive and incendiary that even the events of Watergate pale in comparison," Trump said in the lawsuit.
Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer, is also named in the lawsuit for compiling the dossier that the FBI and media outlets allegedly circulated before the November 2016 election.
"They worked together with a single, self-serving purpose: to vilify Donald J. Trump," the lawsuit claimed. "Indeed, their far-reaching conspiracy was designed to cripple Trump's bid for presidency by fabricating a scandal that would be used to trigger an unfounded federal investigation and ignite a media frenzy."
The lawsuit regurgitates public statements that the former president has proclaimed in the public, such as at political rallies and outside the White House nearby Marine One, over the past five years. The lawsuit included details John Durham unearthed in his ongoing investigation as special counsel into the 2016 campaign, as well as former special counsel Robert Mueller.
Now, Trump is seeking to recover more than $72 million in damages—an amount that is triple the $24 million in legal fees—in the 16-count lawsuit that will be heard before U.S. District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks, who sits in the Southern District of Florida.
Trump is suing under RICO, RICO conspiracy, injurious falsehood, conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood, malicious prosecution, computer fraud and abuse act, theft of trade secrets, conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood, agency, and multiple counts of respondeat superior.
Read the complaint:
Trump noted that "when their gambit failed," and he was elected, the defendants continued their focus to undermine his presidential administration.
He added, "The deception, malice, and treachery perpetrated by the defendants has caused significant harm to the American people, and to the plaintiff, Donald J. Trump, and they must be held accountable for their heinous acts."
Sign up for Law.com Radar to keep up with the latest news and lawsuits in a personalized legal news feed. Track federal litigation, deals and who's getting the work by industry, practice area and region.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Auto Dealers Ask Court to Pump the Brakes on Scout Motors’ Florida Sales Auto Dealers Ask Court to Pump the Brakes on Scout Motors’ Florida Sales](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailybusinessreview/contrib/content/uploads/sites/414/2023/01/Miami-Dade-County-Courthouse-767x633.jpg)
Auto Dealers Ask Court to Pump the Brakes on Scout Motors’ Florida Sales
3 minute read![Saul Ewing Loses Two Partners to Fox Rothschild, Marking Four Fla. Partner Exits in Last 13 Months Saul Ewing Loses Two Partners to Fox Rothschild, Marking Four Fla. Partner Exits in Last 13 Months](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/70/63/50b038604196ba08df26dc76c61e/zemel-poppe-767x633.jpg)
Saul Ewing Loses Two Partners to Fox Rothschild, Marking Four Fla. Partner Exits in Last 13 Months
3 minute read![Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/18/1b/6bd668a742d2b7c52a213921ac7b/bucciero-gorwitz-cid-767x633.jpg)
Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie
3 minute read![Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1a/5a/54f1609943889700618e7b8cd244/shaw-wilder-robinson-767x633.jpg)
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Connecticut Movers: New Laterals, Expanding Teams
- 2Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 3AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 4One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 5Making the Case for Workflow Automation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250