Insurance Off Table for April Special Legislative Session
House Speaker Chris Sprowls said that more time needs to be given to property-insurance changes made during the 2021 session.
April 04, 2022 at 11:48 AM
4 minute read
Fixes for Florida's troubled property-insurance system aren't likely to be added to a special legislative session this month on congressional redistricting.
House Speaker Chris Sprowls, R-Palm Harbor, said Friday that more time needs to be given to property-insurance changes made during the 2021 session.
"If you're talking about the special session, the proclamation is for redistricting," Sprowls said when asked about the issue during an event at the Polk County Sheriff's Office in Winter Haven.
"We passed one of the most expansive reforms to the insurance industry that's ever been done in Florida," Sprowls said, referring to the 2021 legislation. "One thing that happens, we talk about this all the time, is that it takes 18 months to see those (changes) reflected in the rates. We're about six months out from that."
Insurance proposals died in the 2022 regular legislative session, after the Senate took a more aggressive approach than the House on issues such as trying to address roof-damage claims. Insurers blame questionable, if not fraudulent, roof-damage claims from driving up costs.
Gov. Ron DeSantis last week called a special session that will be held from April 19 to April 22 to redraw congressional districts. That led to speculation about whether lawmakers could consider other topics, such as property insurance.
In 2021, lawmakers approved changes that included a new formula to limit fees of attorneys who represent homeowners in lawsuits against insurers and a reduction from three years to two years in the time to file claims. They also passed a proposal aimed at preventing roofing contractors from advertising to spur homeowners to file claims, though a federal court has blocked that part of the law on free-speech grounds.
The law also allowed larger rate increases for customers of the state-backed Citizens Property Insurance Corp., which often charges less than private carriers.
But many private insurers in recent months have sought hefty rate increases and dropped customers to reduce financial risks. That has led to thousands of homeowners a week turning to Citizens for coverage, with Citizens' total number of policies expected to top 1 million by the end of the year.
The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation held a hearing Thursday on a request by Citizens to raise rates by nearly 11 percent, starting Aug. 1. During that hearing, Brian Donovan, chief actuary for Citizens, described the property insurance market as being in "crisis."
Citizens President and CEO Barry Gilway said during the hearing that it is "way too early to tell" the impact of the 2021 legislation (SB 76) on the market.
On Wednesday, the rating-firm Demotech withdrew a financial stability rating from Tampa-based Lighthouse Property Insurance Corp.. Also, in recent weeks, St. Johns Insurance Co. and Avatar Property & Casualty Insurance Co. have gone into state receivership because of insolvencies.
Sprowls said Lighthouse and the others don't fully reflect the conditions of Florida's insurance market.
"The only thing that nobody talks about when they talk about those companies that are going out of business, is that those were companies who were allowed into Florida, when our regulations were significantly lower, and they were wildly undercapitalized," Sprowls said. "So, they were stealing from Peter to pay Paul the entire time they've been in business in the state of Florida. While I think it's instructive to realize that our residents are seeing rate increases, we have to open up the marketplace. I think using those companies is a bad example."
On Tuesday, DeSantis said he expected lawmakers to address the insurance market this year, at the latest after the November elections. DeSantis followed Sprowls on Friday by saying, "it will happen because people want it to happen."
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida. News Service Executive Editor Jim Saunders contributed to this report.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readBack-To-Back Hurricanes' Impact on Florida Legal Work Will Go Beyond Usual Suspects
5 minute readHolland & Knight Snags 2 Insurance Partners in New York and Philadelphia From Goodwin
3 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
- 22 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
- 3Trade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
- 4Rule of Law: Is Big Law Too Shortsighted?
- 5The Empty Promise of ‘Dubin v. United States’
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250