Calling for an End to the 24/7, 365 Lawyer
If we do not receive that order on Sunday night or read that email in the middle of the night, the likelihood is that no one is going to die. Let's reduce stress and improve the quality of our lives.
April 22, 2022 at 09:32 AM
6 minute read
There are some professions, like medicine, which may require attention on a 24-hour, seven-days-a-week basis. A medical emergency can be a real emergency, foreshadowing the potential for a life-or-death outcome. Lawyers, not to be outdone by their brethren in the medical field, have created for themselves an environment in which nonstop attention to professional endeavors has become the norm, rather than the exception. The questions are: to what extent is it necessary for lawyers to be on call 24/7, 365? Do we do this to ourselves because of our obsessive personalities? What can we do to change this condition, to recapture our lives and our well-being?
Attorneys are not typically required to rescue people from burning buildings, resuscitate heart attack victims or perform emergency surgery. Yes, there are those infrequent occasions when legal matters are emergencies, such as emergency injunctions, Baker Act petitions, emergency guardianships, death penalty appeals, bond hearings, etc. This article is not intended to negate the fact that such emergencies do happen. But we must shed light on the nonemergency daily exchanging of emails with clients and opposing counsels, preparing pleadings, answering discovery and reviewing court orders at all hours of the night—forcing our colleagues in the profession to respond to same or be left behind in the nonstop practice of law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Lawyer Turned Emmy-Winning Comedian is Headlining at the Broward Center for the Performing Arts
4 minute readReflections: Parenting Lessons From Life as a Sports Attorney
More Young Lawyers Are Entering Big Law With Mental Health Issues. Are Firms Ready to Accommodate Them?
'As I've Grown Older': John Morgan Looks Back at a Life in Law
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 2'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 3Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
- 4After DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 5People in the News—Jan. 23, 2025—Marshall Dennehey, Duane Morris, Hangley Aronchick
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250