Utah Sen. Mike Lee. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM Senators Seek to Loosen Google's Grip on Digital Ad Market
A bill, led by Sen. Mike Lee, a Utah Republican, would bar companies with more than $20 billion in digital advertising revenue from owning the tools to help buy and sell online ads and operating the exchange where those transactions occur.
May 03, 2022 at 01:47 PM
2 minute read
A bipartisan group of senators intends to introduce legislation as soon as this week that would force Alphabet Inc.'s Google to sell off parts of its lucrative advertising technology business, according to two people familiar with the matter.
The bill, led by Sen. Mike Lee, a Utah Republican, would bar companies with more than $20 billion in digital advertising revenue from owning the tools to help buy and sell online ads and operating the exchange where those transactions occur.
The measure would also compel companies with more than $5 billion in digital advertising revenue to act in customers' best interests and provide greater transparency on data collection, the terms of winning bids and the fees they charge, which would have major implications for Google, Amazon.com Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc., which owns Facebook and Instagram.
Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut are also sponsors on the bill, said the people, who declined to be identified because the plans to introduce the bill are not yet public.
Representatives for Google, Amazon and Facebook and a spokesperson for Lee didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
Google's dominance in the advertising technology market — the tools used to buy, sell and display the online ads that help fund many websites — has been the subject of intense antitrust scrutiny. Attorneys general from 15 states plus Puerto Rico sued Google in December 2020 for allegedly monopolizing the market. That effort, which is being led by Texas, accuses Google and Facebook, the No. 1 and No. 2 players in online advertising, of reaching a secret illegal pact in 2018 to divide up the market for ads on websites and apps.
Both Facebook and Google deny that their agreement was illegal.
The Justice Department has been investigating Google's advertising technology business since 2018, and European authorities have opened their own competition probes into the Google-Facebook deal, nicknamed Jedi Blue.
Google is expected to generate $174.81 billion in net digital ad revenue this year, an increase of 17.3%, according to Insider Intelligence analyst Paul Verna. That gives it a 29% share of the worldwide digital ad market. Facebook is second with a 21.4% share.
Leah Nylen reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Judge Slaps $16 Million Penalty on Defendants in Wyndham Timeshare Advertising Fraud Case
4 minute read
Gibson Dunn Recruits S&C Partner to Co-Lead M&A Practice, in 2-Partner Hire
Consumer Class Action Accuses Fabletics of Misleading Customers of 'VIP Membership Program' Value
Trending Stories
- 1$34M Verdict Shows How 1 Claim Could Ratchet Up Employment Suit
- 2OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
- 3Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 4Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 5Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
