Yellen Says Abortion-Rights Rollback Puts Economy at Risk
"What we're talking about is whether women will have the ability to regulate their reproductive situation in ways that will enable them to plan lives that are fulfilling and satisfying to them," Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said.
May 11, 2022 at 12:49 PM
4 minute read
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen entered one of the most politically charged U.S. debates, saying the economy would suffer if the Supreme Court significantly limits women's access to abortion.
Eliminating the right to access abortion services "would have very damaging effects on the economy and would set women back decades," Yellen told lawmakers during a Senate Banking Committee hearing, responding to a question from Democratic Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey about the economic impact of an abortion ban.
Economic research, she added, suggested such a move would increase poverty levels for women and hurt the future earnings of children. The remarks were disputed by Republicans on the panel, who highlighted policies that can help single mothers and the drop in American birth rates that affects long-run growth.
The draft of a Supreme Court ruling that would overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision became public this month. If the ruling were made final, it would strike down a half-century federal precedent that gave women the right to seek an abortion, and it would allow states to make their own laws and restrictions.
A senior Republican on the panel, Tim Scott of South Carolina, objected to Yellen framing the issue of abortion in economic terms. "An unusually piercing comment that you made," he said.
"I think people can disagree on the issue of being pro-life or pro-abortion, but in the end I think framing it in the context of labor force participation just feels callous to me," he said.
Yellen responded that she didn't mean to sound harsh but was speaking to the economic realities for women and children.
"What we're talking about is whether women will have the ability to regulate their reproductive situation in ways that will enable them to plan lives that are fulfilling and satisfying to them," said Yellen, an economist who previously served as Federal Reserve chair and is the first woman in U.S. history to hold the post of Treasury secretary.
"One aspect of a satisfying life is being able to feel like you have the financial resources to raise a child, that the children you bring into the word are wanted, and you have the ability to take care of them," she said.
Yellen's analysis is supported by a number of studies, in what's a politically contentious issue that's set to feature prominently in the November midterm congressional elections.
"What research shows is that limiting access to abortion for women leads to higher unemployment, less ability to feed themselves and their families and greater chance of falling into poverty," said Diana Foster, director of research at Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, a program at the University of California, San Francisco. "It's not just their lives but also their families and children's lives."
Tuesday's hearing took on a personal tone when Scott, a potential future chair of the Senate Banking Committee if the GOP adds at least one seat to its number in November, invoked his own childhood.
"As a guy raised by a Black woman in abject poverty, I am thankful to be here," said Scott, the first Black Republican senator from the deep South since the 1890s.
Nevada Democrat Catherine Cortez Masto later addressed Scott's remarks saying, "You can't know everyone's circumstances."
"I appreciate his circumstances and he is very proud of it. I think that's fantastic. But why impose your experience and circumstances on others until you walk in their shoes?" Cortez Masto said.
Scott, in closing remarks for the GOP at the two-hour-plus hearing, responded to the Nevada senator saying, "Why should I impose my circumstances on others? Well, because my circumstances are like so many others, millions and millions of kids being raised in poverty."
He said that tax cuts that Republicans enacted in 2017 offered significant help to single mothers. His GOP colleague Steve Daines of Montana also said that low birth rates and an aging population posed a threat to economic prosperity.
Christopher Condon reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Florida Judge Threatened With Assault, Kidnapping and Death
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250