Arguing that a 15-week limit on abortions signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis is unconstitutional, abortion clinics from across the state launched a legal challenge that seeks to block the law from taking effect in July.
The lawsuit was filed in Leon County circuit court by attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, Planned Parenthood and the Center for Reproductive Rights. The plaintiffs include Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida, Planned Parenthood of South, East and North Florida and clinics in Gainesville, Tampa, St. Petersburg and Jacksonville.
The plaintiffs argue that the law (HB 5), approved during this year's legislative session and signed by DeSantis in April, will violate "fundamental privacy rights" under the state Constitution. The plaintiffs also argue the law would punish abortion providers if it isn't barred from taking effect July 1.
"Because of the act's severe penalties, absent an injunction, plaintiffs and their staff will be forced to stop providing care to patients seeking abortions after 15 weeks LMP [last menstrual period], contrary to their good-faith medical judgment and their patients' needs and wishes. With no one available to provide such care in Florida, Florida women will suffer irreparable harm to their autonomy, their well-being, and their dignity, in violation of their rights under the Florida Constitution," the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit said people who perform or participate in performing abortions beyond 15 weeks of pregnancy could face third-degree felony charges.
It said nearly 5,000 women obtain abortions after 14 weeks of pregnancy each year, citing a 2021 report from the Agency for Health Care Administration that showed 4,850 abortions performed in the second trimester of pregnancy.
The lawsuit names numerous defendants, including Florida's state attorneys, who are "authorized to initiate and prosecute alleged violations" of the law. Other defendants are state Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, who doubles as secretary of the Florida Department of Health; Agency for Health Care Administration Secretary Simone Marstiller; the Florida Board of Medicine and its chairman, David Diamond; the Florida Board of Osteopathic Medicine and its chairwoman, Sandra Schwemmer; and the Florida Board of Nursing and its chairwoman, Maggie Hansen.
The abortion bill was one of the most controversial issues of this year's legislative session and came as the U.S. Supreme Court considers the constitutionality of a similar Mississippi law. A leaked draft opinion in the Supreme Court case indicated justices could use it to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion decision.
The lawsuit filed Wednesday, however, is based on a privacy clause in the Florida Constitution that has long played a critical role in abortion cases in the state.
"The Florida Supreme Court has long held that their state Constitution protects the right to end a pregnancy. That means even if Roe falls, abortion should remain protected in Florida, and this ban should be blocked," Nancy Northrup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement.
When DeSantis signed the bill, he held an event at a Kissimmee church, with screens displaying the message, "Florida protege el derecho la vida," or "Florida protects the right to life."
"We are here today to protect life. We are here today to defend those who can't defend themselves," DeSantis said.
But Rep. Anna Eskamani, an Orlando Democrat who formerly worked at Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida, issued a statement Wednesday touting the legal challenge.
"This law is a direct assault on Florida's decades-old privacy clause in the state Constitution that prohibits government intrusion on people's lives. Floridians have demonstrated in the past and present support for privacy and an understanding that decisions around someone's pregnancy are personal," Eskamani said.
Daniel Tilley, legal director for the ACLU of Florida, said the 15-week limit would have "life-altering consequences," including potential health risks.
"The impacts of HB 5 will fall hardest on Black women in particular, who already face maternal mortality rates three times higher than white women," Tilley said on a press call about the lawsuit.
Ryan Dailey reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 2Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 3Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 4Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 5'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250