HoloLens Future in Question After Project Leader Departs
The change comes as Microsoft waits on the fate of a $21.9 billion contract that may determine whether there's enough demand for the HoloLens to continue the product's development.
June 08, 2022 at 12:23 PM
4 minute read
Microsoft Corp. said the executive in charge of its HoloLens goggles is leaving the company, putting the future of its augmented-reality project in question.
Alex Kipman, who had been with the Redmond, Washington-based software firm since 2001, was accused of inappropriate behavior toward female employees at Microsoft by current and former workers in an Insider report in late May. He had been the public face of the HoloLens initiative and his departure comes at a sensitive time for the project, as Microsoft is deciding on whether to continue developing its own AR hardware, according to two people familiar with the matter.
HoloLens hardware will now be overseen by Panos Panay, who heads up Microsoft's Surface computer division, while Jeff Teper, a corporate vice president managing areas such as the Teams collaboration product, will take over the software part of the group, the people said. Microsoft Cloud chief Scott Guthrie detailed the changes on Tuesday in a memo sent to executive staff, according to the people, who declined to be named because the company isn't publicly discussing the decision.
Before HoloLens, Kipman had stints at Microsoft's Windows and Xbox teams and was one of its longest-tenured employees. The Insider report alleged that longtime executives at the company such as Kipman had been allowed to engage in verbal and sexual harassment of workers.
Microsoft declined to comment on Kipman or the product's future.
The changes come as Microsoft waits on the fate of a $21.9 billion contract that may determine whether there's enough demand for the HoloLens to continue the product's development. The company had agreed to provide a customized version of the head-worn accessory for the US Army in a 10-year accord that would include as many as 121,500 goggles along with spare parts, logistics and program management support. But that project has not gone smoothly and the Army said in April that it may spend less than half the maximum amount. Army Secretary Christine Wormuth last month expressed confidence that the kinks in that system, called IVAS, have been resolved.
Microsoft has other commercial customers for HoloLens, but needs the Army deal to secure enough scale for the product, the people said.
If the Army deal doesn't come to fruition, Microsoft may have to re-evaluate whether to keep making HoloLens hardware. It already has a deal with Samsung Electronics Co. that could enable the South Korean electronics giant to start making hardware for Microsoft's corporate customers, the people said. Kipman, as one of the HoloLens' original executives and an outspoken evangelist for the technology, was committed to the device being made in-house in a way that Panay may not be, they added.
Microsoft unveiled what was then the top-secret HoloLens project at a Windows event in 2015 to much fanfare, showing prototype applications such as 3-D Minecraft where users could blast through a room's walls and coffee tables to reveal lava and caves as well as a holographic conferencing system. But the company has never been able to get the price of the headset below several thousand dollars and as a result it's focused on corporate applications rather than consumer ones.
The questions about HoloLens' future come as Microsoft tries to figure out its strategy for the so-called metaverse, a concept for future computing built around users living, working and playing in interconnected virtual worlds. HoloLens had been seen as a key pillar of that strategy and changes to it might push Microsoft to focus its metaverse development on software.
Much of the early metaverse work Microsoft has shown also works with headsets from other companies and relies on software like the Teams app — where Microsoft has pitched the idea of holographic avatars in meetings. That's part of why software oversight of HoloLens will move under Teper, as his group already houses some of the company's metaverse engineers.
Dina Bass reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShareholder Claims Next Science Sold Risky Product Despite Knowing the Dangers
4 minute readCorporate Disclosure Law Enjoys ‘Presumption of Constitutionality,’ Feds Tell Justices
Florida’s Civil Procedure Rules: Attorneys Foresee More Settlements Amid Time Challenges
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Don't F-- With Me in My Court:' Texas Judge in Hot Water
- 2Special Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
- 3Appeals Court Rejects Trump Attempt to Delay Friday Sentencing
- 4Strategic Pricing: Setting the Billable Hour at the Intersection of Psychology, Feedback and Growth
- 5'Taking the Best' of Both Firms, Ballard Spahr and Lane Powell Officially Merge
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250