Solar-Panel Makers Scorn 'Pittance' of Aid in Biden Relief Plan
The Biden administration invoked sweeping powers under the Cold War-era Defense Production Act to propel U.S. manufacturing of an array of critical energy technologies, including solar panels, fuel cells and heat pumps.
June 08, 2022 at 12:09 PM
4 minute read
President Joe Biden's plan to kick-start domestic solar-panel manufacturing depends for now on a federal fund with less than a half billion dollars that's already being tapped to pay for products, including military drones and baby formula.
That funding—even if fully dedicated to solar production—would only be enough to open a few factories capable of cranking out a fraction of the panels the U.S. currently imports each year, according to manufacturers.
"Even if they spent all of that on solar panels, it's a pittance," said Nick Iacovella, a spokesman for the pro-manufacturing Coalition for a Prosperous America.
The federal funding may not even be available for the president's new solar initiatives. That same pot also may be needed to address other supply shortages and national-security needs.
Major elements of the program, including its funding, are still taking shape, following Biden's announcement Monday. The White House is expected to seek additional funding from Congress. The Department of Energy is working with other agencies and industry leaders to identify the most urgent needs and the right financial tools to address them, an administration official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss private details. That includes working with Congress to ensure there are necessary resources to advance the directives.
The president's actions will enable American companies to advance clean energy projects while the administration works with Congress, industry leaders and others to make the critical investments needed to rapidly expand domestic clean energy manufacturing, the official said.
Biden invoked sweeping powers under the Cold War-era Defense Production Act to propel U.S. manufacturing of an array of critical energy technologies, including solar panels, fuel cells and heat pumps. He paired the declarations with a two-year waiver of new tariffs on solar cells and modules from four Southeast Asian nations, part of a bid to neutralize a trade dispute that has chilled renewable projects across the U.S..
Supporters of the president's plan stress that invoking the act does more than just unleash funding. It also hands the U.S. Energy Department new tools and authorities to invest in manufacturing.
The measures "can be used to drive federal procurement, establish project labor agreements, community benefit agreements and master supply agreements, develop loan programs, create partnerships and establish other programs that address the emergency need for clean energy," said Dan Whitten, a spokesman for the Solar Energy Industries Association.
For now, the government appears to have the authority to spend up to $545 million this fiscal year on Defense Production Act purchases. However, there's no more than $434 million available in the fund right now, according to a government spending database.
Biden's plan blindsided domestic manufacturers, which immediately rebuked the initiative. Samantha Sloan, vice president of policy at First Solar Inc., said the measures fell well short of the kind of industrial policy that's needed to truly marshal domestic manufacturing. "We have yet to see this administration put action behind word in supporting U.S. solar manufacturing specifically," she said. "That causes some heartburn on where the priorities do lie."
A new manufacturing plant with the capacity to churn out 1.4 gigawatts of modules each year could cost around $170 million, according to industry estimates and the coalition. That would hardly compete with the 24 gigawatts the U.S. imported last year, Iacovella said.
And the figures pale in comparison to the potential cost of new factories to produce polysilicon, a key ingredient in panels. A new plant producing 20,000 tons of polysilicon per year would easily cost $1 billion, according to BloombergNEF.
Bank of America described Biden's manufacturing move "more as rhetoric," in a research note Tuesday. "Feedback from various parties across the sector suggests it's not a silver bullet," it said.
U.S. solar advocates are still pushing for an array of help from Congress, including expanded tax credits for renewable power projects and measures to encourage clean energy manufacturing. "We view the Defense Production Act as a down payment on manufacturing, planting seeds for long-term growth," said John Smirnow, general counsel of the Solar Energy Industries Association.
Jennifer A. Dlouhy and Brian Eckhouse report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNo Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readMiami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readThe Inflation Reduction Act: Evaluating Its Impact on Renewable Energy Producers and Analyzing Emerging Needs
Trending Stories
- 1Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 2Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 3Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
- 4Zoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
- 5Judge Grants TRO Blocking Federal Funding Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250