DeSantis Vetoes Controversial Everglades Bill
After the veto was announced, Jonathan Webber, legislative and political director for the group Florida Conservation Voters, said in a statement he hopes "this will be a signal to lawmakers to stop using legislative tricks to sneak harmful environmental policy past the Florida public."
June 09, 2022 at 10:17 AM
4 minute read
Gov. Ron DeSantis on Wednesday vetoed a controversial measure tied to Everglades restoration that, even after being watered down during the legislative session, continued to draw concerns about potential wetlands destruction.
Senate President Wilton Simpson, R-Trilby, pushed to pass the bill (SB 2508) during the session that ended in March. DeSantis criticized an initial version, leading lawmakers to rework part of the bill dealing with a massive Everglades reservoir project.
But in vetoing the measure, DeSantis expressed concerns it could still hinder Everglades restoration work he has supported since taking office in 2019.
"We want to continue going on the path that we set out in January of 2019. And we don't want anything to derail us from that," DeSantis said Wednesday during an appearance at Doc Ford's Rum Bar & Grille in Fort Myers Beach. "There was a lot of people that put a lot of good input in. Very, very passionate folks. We hear you, and we're going to continue on the course that we started a little over three years ago."
In a veto letter, DeSantis said the measure could have stalled Everglades restoration.
"While the bill that was ultimately passed by the Legislature is an improvement over what was initially filed, SB 2508 still creates unnecessary and redundant regulatory hurdles which may compromise the timely execution and implementation of Everglades restoration projects, water control plans and regulation schedules," DeSantis wrote in the letter submitted to Secretary of State Cord Byrd.
DeSantis injected himself into the debate after the bill was filed, saying the state needed to prioritize money for the reservoir.
Senators maintained that critics misunderstood the bill and that the reservoir wouldn't receive less priority. Still, they responded to the criticism by rewriting the bill to more plainly say that lawmakers weren't revising Lake Okeechobee water-release schedules or cutting funds for the reservoir.
The reservoir was approved in 2017, in part, to help reduce releases of contaminated water from Lake Okeechobee into the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee estuaries, which have struggled in recent years with problems such as toxic algae. The reservoir also is planned to help move water south into the Everglades.
Additional changes to the bill, approved during budget talks between the Senate and House, provided more oversight to DeSantis and the Legislature about directives given to the South Florida Water Management District on the management of water in Lake Okeechobee.
Environmental groups, however, continued to express concern the bill would fast-tract wetlands destruction. The bill would have allowed the Department of Environmental Protection to enter contracts with public entities, including utilities, to expedite environmental-resource permits or to pay into a state fund for the work.
Last week, Audubon Florida sent out a final appeal for a veto, contending that while the bill was "much improved before passage, it still creates unnecessary bureaucracy for Everglades restoration and undermines Florida Forever, the state's land conservation program."
After the veto was announced, Jonathan Webber, legislative and political director for the group Florida Conservation Voters, said in a statement he hopes "this will be a signal to lawmakers to stop using legislative tricks to sneak harmful environmental policy past the Florida public."
The Florida Wildlife Federation issued a statement that said "vetoing this bad bill is necessary for the restoration of the Everglades and protecting the quality of our water."
But the veto also drew criticism.
Ryan Rossi, director of the South Florida Water Coalition, said the veto was based on "narrow, inaccurate concerns."
"By vetoing this legislation, Gov. DeSantis has disappointed the more than seven million people in South Florida that depend on a stable supply of fresh water from Lake Okeechobee," Rossi said in the statement.
DeSantis was joined at the Fort Myers Beach appearance by opponents of the bill.
Captains for Clean Water Executive Director Daniel Andrews, a fishing guide from Fort Myers, said DeSantis' action "sends an incredibly powerful message" that people pitching "counter efforts to water quality issues, you're gonna get steamrolled by Gov. DeSantis."
The state budget DeSantis signed last week includes $500 million for Everglades restoration projects and more than $558 million targeted toward water-quality projects aimed at reducing nutrient levels in key waterways. DeSantis, however, vetoed $350 million for aquifer-storage wells to reduce pollutants entering the north side of Lake Okeechobee, another Simpson priority.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 2NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 3A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 4Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 5State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250