EY Fined $100M After Employees Cheated on Ethics Exam
Many Ernst & Young employees knew that their behavior violated the company's code of conduct, but some still did it because they couldn't pass on their own, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
June 28, 2022 at 11:46 AM
3 minute read
Ernst & Young admitted that dozens of its audit personnel cheated on the ethics portion of the certified public accountant exam and that the firm misled U.S. regulators probing the misconduct, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
The SEC announced on Tuesday that EY would pay a $100 million fine, the largest ever penalty for an audit firm. In addition to violating accounting rules, EY didn't cooperate with a key part of the regulator's probe, the agency said.
Almost 50 EY audit employees improperly shared answer keys to the ethics portion of the CPA exam between 2017 and 2021 and hundreds more cheated on continuing professional education courses, the SEC said.
EY said in a statement that it's complying with the SEC's settlement order and will take additional steps to improve compliance.
"We are confident that the outcomes of the undertakings will reinforce steps we have already taken in the years since these situations occurred," the firm said. "Sharing answers on any assessment or exam is a violation of our Code of Conduct and is not tolerated at EY. Our response to this unacceptable past behavior has been thorough, extensive, and effective."
Despite having been informed of possibly dishonest behavior, the firm conveyed to the agency that it didn't have a problem with cheating, according to the SEC. The auditor then failed to promptly correct those statements when it later launched an internal investigation.
Many EY employees knew that their behavior violated the company's code of conduct, but some still did it because they couldn't pass on their own, according to the SEC. The firm ultimately disciplined and, in some cases, fired individuals for their actions, according to the SEC, which said it's investigation is ongoing.
"It's simply outrageous that the very professionals responsible for catching cheating by clients cheated on ethics exams," Gurbir Grewal, the head of the SEC's enforcement division, said in the statement. "It's equally shocking that Ernst & Young hindered our investigation of this misconduct."
In addition to the record penalty, EY must hire two separate consultants to examine its ethics policies and another to review disclosure failures.
The firm has been sued by Wall Street's main regulator other times in recent years. Last August, EY paid about a $10 million penalty to the SEC for violating auditor independence rules. In 2016, it was penalized $9 million to settle claims of inappropriate relationships with clients.
EY's record SEC penalty follows a $50 million fine against KPMG in 2019 for cheating on internal training exams, as well as for altering past audit work after receiving stolen information from an industry watchdog. KPMG also admitted wrongdoing in settling that case.
Matt Robinson reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAbout to Become a Partner? Here's What to Know About Your Newfound Wealth
10 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Chief Business Development and Marketing Officer From EY
2 minute readMcDermott Welcomes Back Litigation Partner Following Stint With Miami-Dade County
3 minute readFlorida Bar Rolls Out Free Trust Accounting Software for All Its Members
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York’s Proposed Legislation Restraining Transfer of Real Property
- 2Withers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
- 3To Speed Criminal Discovery, NY Bill Proposes Police-to-Prosecutor Pipeline For Records
- 4Merchan Rejects Trump's Bid to Delay Manhattan Sentencing
- 5High-Low Settlement Agreement 'Does Not Alone Establish Bias:' State High Court Affirms $20M Med Mal Verdict
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250