Spirit Airlines air crafts at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. Credit: YES Market Media/Shutterstock JetBlue's Revised Spirit Offer Wins Backing From Investor TIG
Spirit Airlines' board has rejected JetBlue's offers repeatedly, saying the combination would be blocked by federal antitrust enforcers.
June 28, 2022 at 11:31 AM
3 minute read
JetBlue Airways Corp. continued its fight to acquire Spirit Airlines Inc., raising its all-cash bid yet again in response to an increased offer by rival suitor Frontier Group Holdings Inc. in the days before a crucial shareholder vote.
The intensifying bidding war sent Spirit's shares up 5.3% at 8:08 a.m. Tuesday before regular trading in New York. Frontier climbed 2% and JetBlue fell less than 1%.
The newest JetBlue proposal, which won the backing of Spirit investor TIG Advisors LLC Tuesday, includes an accelerated prepayment of $2.50 a share, structured as a cash dividend to shareholders after approval of the terms. That's up from $1.50 a share in a prior offer. JetBlue said it also increased its breakup fee to $400 million from $350 million, to be paid if antitrust regulators block the combination.
The revised bid, revealed late Monday, includes a so-called ticking fee mechanism as well, which could boost the overall value of the offer to $34.15 a share, or $3.7 billion. The pledges, marking the fifth revision for JetBlue in its effort to secure a deal, come a week after the carrier increased its bid to $33.50 a share.
TIG said in a letter to Spirit's board that it would vote against Frontier's proposal and the airline should instead pursue a deal with JetBlue, calling it "far superior." The investor said both deals likely face "rigorous" antitrust reviews, so shareholders would be better off going with the proposal that compensates them during the process.
JetBlue and Frontier are seeking to woo Spirit shareholders ahead of a Thursday vote that should end the bidding war for Spirit, a deep discounter with low fares and fees for anything extra. The would-be buyers covet Spirit for the growth and competitive strength they could quickly gain through an acquisition. The US industry is dominated by four major carriers, and the victor in the war for Spirit would be ranked fifth, based on domestic passenger traffic.
Frontier struck back Tuesday, saying in a statement that JetBlue would remove capacity from the market and hike fares, making it unlikely to pass antitrust muster.
"A Spirit acquisition by JetBlue would lead to a dead end — a fact that no amount of money, bluster or misdirection will change," Frontier said. "JetBlue's proposal lacks any realistic likelihood of obtaining regulatory approval."
Frontier on Friday boosted the cash portion of its bid to $4.13 a share, up about $2 from its original bid, along with 1.9126 share of its stock for each of Spirit's. Those terms valued the airline at about $2.6 billion based on the closing price that day. Spirit shareholders would receive $2.22 a share as a cash dividend once the transaction is approved. Frontier also raised its proposed breakup fee to $350 million.
Spirit's board has rejected JetBlue's offers repeatedly, saying the combination would be blocked by federal antitrust enforcers. Frontier has said its proposal would give shareholders better long-term value as the airline industry recovers from the pandemic and travel demand soars.
Frontier agreed in February to acquire Spirit in a cash-and-stock deal valued at $2.9 billion at that time. JetBlue challenged the merger with an unsolicited proposal two months later, kicking off the bidding war.
Mary Schlangenstein and Scott Deveau report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Securities Claims Against Lilium N.V. for Electric Plane Production Delays Fail to Take Flight, Federal Judge Holds
5 minute read
Family Sues United Airlines After Miscommunication Leads to 'Near Death' Dive Toward Ocean
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
