Microsoft Investors File Resolution Targeting Tax Practices
Investors managing more than $350 billion in total filed a resolution demanding that Microsoft disclose its tax and financial information on a country-by-country basis.
June 28, 2022 at 01:57 PM
4 minute read
Microsoft Corp., a staple of ESG investment funds, is being called out by a group of shareholders for what they say is its poor track record on tax transparency.
Investors managing more than $350 billion in total filed a resolution demanding that Microsoft report in line with the Global Reporting Initiative Tax Standard, according to a statement from the group on Tuesday. The resolution also calls on Microsoft to disclose its tax and financial information on a country-by-country basis.
"Technology is a sector that has historically been characterized by tax avoidance, particularly for large multinationals like Microsoft," said Katie Hepworth, responsible tax lead at Pensions & Investment Research Consultants Ltd., which coordinated the resolution. The risk of regulatory "investigation and intervention" is a particular concern for investors, Hepworth said in a statement.
That's as taxation becomes a hot topic in Europe, where officials have taken aim at complicated structures used by multinationals to reduce tax rates or drive them to zero. Lawmakers last month advanced a plan for a minimum corporate tax rate of 15% from 2023 for large firms, to implement a landmark agreement by 136 countries to stop luring companies with ever-lower tax rates.
Microsoft recorded profits of $315 billion in an Irish subsidy in 2020, "despite having no employees" there, according to PIRC, Europe's largest independent corporate governance and shareholder advisory consultancy. PIRC has supported similar resolutions at Cisco Systems Inc. and Amazon.com, as part of a larger campaign targeting 30 companies in industries that have a record of tax avoidance or that count governments among their customers.
Representatives for Cisco declined to comment, while spokespeople for Microsoft said they were looking into the resolution but didn't immediately provide a comment.
Companies that failed to respond to an effort by signatories to the UN's Principles for Responsible Investment to address tax policy are being targeted by the PIRC's campaign, Hepworth said by email.
"Our decision to escalate engagement at tech companies through the filing of shareholder resolutions also reflects the increased risk to investors of tax avoidance strategies, due to the historic OECD global tax reforms," Hepworth said. Tech companies were "explicitly named as a justification for the reforms" which are also designed to end new digital taxes that the US contends are discriminatory.
The Microsoft resolution, filed on June 13, was led by Danish pension fund AkademikerPension, with co-filers including Nordea Asset Management, PenSam, Greater Manchester Pension Fund and OIP Trust.
Corporate tax speculation, whereby companies shift profits to low-tax countries in an effort to dodge the higher levies of the markets in which they operate, costs the U.S. government as much as $100 billion a year, PIRC said. Microsoft doesn't disclose revenue or profit in non-U.S. markets and foreign tax payments aren't disaggregated, which makes it hard for investors to evaluate the risk of stricter tax regulations, PIRC said.
Jens Munch Holst, chief executive at AkademikerPension, said in a statement that "if Microsoft changes course and embraces GRI standards of reporting, it will boost the company's brand and will lift standards across the entire global Big Tech sector." He also said that "charitable donations don't in any way compensate for large-scale tax avoidance."
Microsoft is among the most popular ESG stocks globally, thanks in large part to its perceived low-carbon footprint. The company is the biggest holding in the world's largest ESG exchange-traded fund — BlackRock Inc.'s iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ticker ESGU) — after Apple Inc., according to the latest regulatory filings tracked by Bloomberg.
Shareholders at Microsoft and other tech companies have recently had success with resolutions after years of defeat. Last year, Microsoft reached agreements with two groups in exchange for them pulling their planned proposals; one dealt with the right to repair devices and the other sought an independent human rights review of some deals. In November, investors also voted for a nonbinding resolution seeking a report on the effectiveness of sexual-harassment policies over the company's objections, following reports that co-founder Bill Gates behaved inappropriately toward female employees years ago.
Frances Schwartzkopff reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
3 minute readUS Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250