Florida Power & Light Says Supreme Court Should Uphold Rates
Florida Power & Light attorneys urged the state Supreme Court to uphold a settlement that addresses a series of issues such as rates, profitability and solar-power expansion.
July 21, 2022 at 01:41 PM
4 minute read
Florida Power & Light urged the state Supreme Court to reject challenges to a settlement that increased electric rates, arguing the controversial plan is in the "public interest."
Four groups appealed to the Supreme Court after the state Public Service Commission approved the four-year settlement. In a 111-page brief filed Wednesday, attorneys for FPL urged the court to uphold the settlement, which was reached last year and addresses a series of issues such as rates, profitability and solar-power expansion.
"The current settlement enables FPL to continue its focus on improving service delivery, realize additional efficiencies in operations, and create even stronger customer value, all while providing a high degree of base-rate certainty for customers for at least four years," the brief said.
But in briefs filed in April, opponents blasted the settlement and disputed that it was in the public interest, a legal test in utility cases. In part, they took issue with the amounts of profit FPL would be able to earn under the settlement. Those profits, measured by what is known as a return on equity, would exceed the amounts that could be earned by Duke Energy Florida and Tampa Electric Co.
"If allowed to stand, the 2021 FPL settlement will result in FPL's customers paying hundreds of millions of dollars per year, totaling in the billions of dollars, in excessive costs over the next four years," attorneys for the group Floridians Against Increased Rates wrote in an April brief. "This is a gross miscarriage of justice — imposed on FPL's customers by the PSC's (Public Service Commission's) failure to act consistently with its own contemporaneous decisions — and the (Supreme) Court should reverse the order accordingly."
FPL in March 2021 filed a base-rate proposal at the commission and later reached a settlement with the state Office of Public Counsel, which represents consumers in utility issues, and groups such as the Florida Retail Federation, the Florida Industrial Power Users Group and the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. The commission later signed off on the settlement, which included lower rate increases in 2022 and 2023 than FPL had originally proposed.
The settlement led to a $692 million rate increase in January and will allow another $560 million hike in January 2023. It also will allow increases in 2024 and 2025 to pay for solar-energy projects.
The plan also incorporated a merger between FPL and Northwest Florida's former Gulf Power. That merger, which formally took effect at the beginning of 2021, came with issues such as the utilities having widely different rates. As a result, the settlement included what was described as a "transition rider" that led to Northwest Florida customers paying more than FPL customers in other areas.
In addition to Floridians Against Increased Rates, the groups Florida Rising, the League of United Latin American Citizens of Florida and the Environmental Confederation of Southwest Florida challenged the commission's approval of the settlement.
The challenges deal with numerous issues, such as part of the settlement that set a range for FPL's allowed return on equity. That range includes what is known as a "midpoint" of 10.6 percent.
While the challengers contend that is excessive, FPL said in Wednesday's brief that the settlement is "designed to preserve FPL's financial strength" and that the return-on-equity midpoint was increased only slightly from the past.
"The record evidence demonstrates that making investments necessary to continue to provide customers with safe and reliable power requires financial strength," the brief said. "This settlement allows FPL to maintain the financial strength it needs."
While not directly a part of the Supreme Court case, FPL customers and local-government officials in Northwest Florida have inundated the commission in recent months with requests to re-evaluate the utility's rates. In addition to higher base rates, customers also have faced increased costs related to natural gas for power plants.
"In short, I request that PSC staff be directed to re-investigate FPL's rate increase filings for accuracy, review the current rates effective January 1, to ensure they are fair and reasonable, and, if necessary, direct FPL … to address inadequacies in fuel diversity and fuel supply reliability which have resulted in unconscionable fuel charges to FPL customers following the rate increase which was effective January 1, 2022," DeFuniak Springs City Manager Robert Thompson wrote to the commission last month.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250