Judge Rules Against Congressional Candidate in Ballot Fight
A lawsuit contended that Republican candidate Jerry Torres did not have qualifying paperwork properly notarized as required by law.
August 01, 2022 at 12:29 PM
3 minute read
A Leon County circuit judge ruled that a Republican candidate is ineligible to run for a Tampa Bay-area congressional seat because he failed to properly qualify.
Judge John Cooper ruled against candidate Jerry Torres after holding a hearing Thursday and Friday. Cooper issued a verbal decision that Torres "should be decertified as a candidate," said Mark Herron, an attorney for the plaintiffs who challenged Torres' candidacy.
The Torres campaign will appeal, spokeswoman Angela Morabito said in an email. It was not immediately clear when Cooper will issue a written order.
The lawsuit, filed June 24, contended that Torres did not have qualifying paperwork properly notarized as required by law. Torres filed to run in an Aug. 23 Republican primary in Congressional District 14 in Pinellas and Hillsborough counties, as the GOP seeks to unseat U.S. Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Fla., in November.
Plaintiffs in the case included the Florida Democratic Party and former state Rep. Sean Shaw, D-Tampa.
"Defendant Torres has violated a valid and constitutional statute requiring a lawfully notarized candidate oath be submitted to the Division [of Elections] so as to appropriately qualify as a candidate," attorneys for the plaintiffs wrote in a court document filed Wednesday. "Due to this violation, defendant Torres is not qualified to run. This is not an action seeking to disqualify defendant Torres, but instead to declare that due to the legal insufficiencies of his qualifying paperwork, at no point material has defendant Torres in fact been a duly qualified candidate."
But in a document filed Friday, Torres' attorneys wrote that the "presumption in Florida is that elections are to be decided by voters, not by political adversaries or by the courts."
"There is no question that Mr. Torres is substantively qualified to stand for election," Torres' attorneys wrote. "He submitted his qualifying paperwork timely. There is no allegation or evidence that it was anything other than true, accurate and complete. He paid the filing fee in the amount and in the manner required. He signed the candidate oath. Because he was relying on professional campaign staff to handle these matters, he did not understand that the oath was anything other than part of an application or set of documents necessary to run for office. He did not understand that it needed to be notarized, and if he had he would have done so. His professional campaign staff made multiple attempts to get the oath notarized outside his presence. The secretary [of state] accepted his paper and did not inform him of any defect."
The appeal of Cooper's ruling would go to the Tallahassee-based First District Court of Appeal. Torres' attorneys went to the appellate court July 18 to try to halt the circuit-court hearing but were unsuccessful.
James Judge, another Republican candidate in the race, quickly issued a statement Friday after Cooper's decision, saying "the court ruled fairly."
"It is time to band together as Americans," Judge said in the statement. "This November, I look forward to taking down Kathy Castor and the rest of the Democrat politicians who have caused sky-high fuel prices, runaway inflation, defunded our police, supported criminals, all while working tirelessly to brainwash our children and strip us of our Second Amendment rights. God bless our great nation!"
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Will Happen to the Nominees in Florida's Southern and Middle Districts?
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250