Hialeah Abortion Clinic Fights State Fine
The case is linked, at least in part, to a 2015 state law that requires women to receive information from doctors and then wait at least 24 hours before having abortions.
August 04, 2022 at 11:55 AM
3 minute read
State and Local Government
A South Florida abortion clinic is fighting an attempt by state regulators to impose a $41,000 fine over allegations that the clinic did not show that it provided required information to women at least 24 hours before abortions.
The Hialeah clinic, A GYN Diagnostic Center, is challenging the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration in the state Division of Administrative hearings, according to documents filed Monday. The case emerged as the agency also faces an administrative challenge to an attempt to revoke the license of a Pensacola abortion clinic.
The Hialeah case is linked, at least in part, to a 2015 state law that requires women to receive information from doctors and then wait at least 24 hours before having abortions. After years of battles about the constitutionality of the law, a Leon County circuit judge upheld the waiting-period requirement in April.
The Agency for Health Care Administration, which regulates abortion clinics, alleged that it reviewed records at the Hialeah facility on May 17 and could not find documentation that 41 patients had received the required information. It said it would fine the clinic $1,000 for each of the patients.
"The documentation was required to establish that the physician who was to perform the procedure or the referring physician, had at a minimum, orally, while physically present in the room, and at least 24 hours before the procedure informed the patient of the risks set out in (state law)." the agency's administrative complaint said. "Absent such documentation, there was no record that the clinic obtained each patient's informed consent to the procedure."
But the clinic fired back in a legal document, disputing the allegations and accusing the agency of "uncleaned hands" in the case.
"Petitioner (the agency) knew or should have known that respondent (the clinic) and its treating physicians gave notice to each patient pursuant (to state law)," the document said. "Respondent gave the two forms (signed by each patient) … to petitioner, showing compliance with the statute."
The Hialeah and Pensacola cases come amid a backdrop of legal and political battles across the country about abortion issues. As an example, Florida lawmakers and Gov. Ron DeSantis this year approved a measure to prevent abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, drawing constitutional challenges that remain pending.
In the Pensacola case filed last week at the Division of Administrative Hearings, the Agency for Health Care Administration is seeking to revoke the license of Integrity Medical Care, LLC, which does business as American Family Planning, and impose a $343,200 fine.
The agency has focused, in part, on complications suffered by two women who went to the Pensacola facility in March and May for second-trimester abortions. It alleged that physicians and staff did not comply with the proper standard of care.
But in a July 12 document filed at the agency, an attorney for the clinic disputed the allegations, writing that the clinic "provided care to patients in accordance with the standard of care" and that its complication rate is lower than the national average. The case has been assigned to Judge W. David Watkins.
The agency in May issued an emergency suspension of the Pensacola clinic's license. The clinic has challenged that move at the 1st District Court of Appeal.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorgan & Morgan Sues Law Firm, Managing Partner for Violating Settlement Over Misleading Ads
3 minute readJudge Gives Green Light to Bal Harbour Developer in Legal Dispute
11th Circuit Rejects Private School's Religious Rights Claim When Stopped From Broadcasting Public Prayer
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 2What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 3Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 4Judge Blasts Authors' Lawyers in Key AI Suit, Says Case Doomed Without Upgraded Team
- 5Federal Judge Won't Stop Title IX Investigation Into Former GMU Law Professor
Who Got The Work
Burr & Forman partner Garry K. Grooms has entered an appearance for 4M Acquisitions and Wallace D. Tweden in a pending environmental lawsuit. The action, filed July 22 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the McKellar Law Group and Mark E. Martin LLC on behalf of Tennessee Riverkeeper, contends that the defendant's violated the Clean Water Act and Tennessee Water Quality Control Act by allowing for the discharge of pollutants into waters of the U.S. without obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge permit. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger, is 3:24-cv-00886, Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Tweden et al.
Who Got The Work
Ramsey M. Al-Salam, Gene W. Lee and Stevan R. Stark of Perkins Coie have entered appearances for R-Pac International in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 12 in New York Southern District Court by PinilisHalpern LLP and Friedman Suder & Cooke on behalf of Adasa Inc, asserts a single patent related to wireless sensors used for tagging products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, is 1:24-cv-06102, Adasa Inc. v. R-Pac International LLC.
Who Got The Work
Walmart has tapped lawyer Nicole M. Wright of Zausmer PC to defend a pending product liability lawsuit. The action was filed Aug. 12 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Wolfe Trial Lawyers on behalf of a plaintiff claiming burns from a defective propane tank. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Leitman, is 2:24-cv-12100, Hill v. Ferrellgas, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Kevin Simpson and James Randall of Winston & Strawn have stepped in to represent Comcast in a pending consumer class action. The case, filed Aug. 11 in Georgia Northern District Court by Kaufman PA, contends that the defendant placed pre-recorded debt collection phone calls to the plaintiff in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee, is 1:24-cv-03553, Pond v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC.
Who Got The Work
Potter Anderson & Corroon partners Christopher N. Kelly and Kevin R. Shannon have stepped in to represent cloud computing company Fastly and its top executives in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 23 in Delaware District Court by deLeeuw Law and Bragar Eagel & Squire on behalf of Mark Sweitzer, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that revenue growth in 2023 was primarily driven by a 'consolidation trend' in which companies simplified operations by reducing the number of content delivery network vendors under management, thereby reducing competition and increasing the defendant's market share. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gregory B. Williams, is 1:24-cv-00969, Sweitzer v. Nightingale et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250