Ruling Against Congressional Candidate Put on Hold
The appeals court did not explain its reasons for granting the stay, But in a motion filed last week, Torres' attorneys pointed, in part, to the fast-approaching Aug. 23 primary.
August 10, 2022 at 11:52 AM
4 minute read
Election and Political Law
With the primary election only two weeks away, an appeals court has put on hold a circuit judge's ruling that said a Tampa Bay-area congressional candidate is ineligible to run because he did not properly qualify.
The 1st District Court of Appeal on Monday approved a request by Republican candidate Jerry Torres for a stay of the ruling by Leon County Circuit Judge John Cooper. The stay will remain in effect as the Tallahassee-based appeals court considers whether Torres is eligible to run in Congressional District 14 in Hillsborough and Pinellas counties.
The appeals court did not explain its reasons for granting the stay, But in a motion filed last week, Torres' attorneys pointed, in part, to the fast-approaching Aug. 23 primary.
"Voting is already happening. Absent a stay, elections supervisors will inform voters that Mr. Torres is disqualified and that votes for him do not count," the motion said. "He will lose endorsements, fundraising opportunities, and the ability to campaign on equal footing with other candidates. An immediate stay is necessary to prevent these harms, preserve the status quo, and ensure that Mr. Torres can have meaningful relief if this court reverses (Cooper's ruling against Torres)."
Cooper ruled that Torres was ineligible because qualifying paperwork was not properly notarized, and the circuit judge denied a request for a stay. The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by plaintiffs including the Florida Democratic Party and former state Rep. Sean Shaw, D-Tampa.
Cooper ordered Secretary of State Cord Byrd to decertify Torres as a candidate in Congressional District 14, where Republicans are trying to unseat U.S. Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Fla. He also ordered county supervisors of elections to comply with requirements about giving notice to voters and tabulating votes "when a candidate has been disqualified."
The circuit judge found that Torres submitted three campaign oaths, including oaths notarized by Mississippi notaries. But Cooper wrote that Torres was not present when the documents were notarized.
"Defendant Torres did not sign the oath form before a notary public or by using online notarization," Cooper wrote in Thursday's 15-page order. "He did not fill out the form. He was never placed under oath. He never even spoke to the notaries who purported to witness his signature. Although the second and third oath forms indicated defendant Torres signed them on June 16, 2022, before a notary in Mississippi, he admits he was in Sierra Leone at the time."
Torres' attorneys quickly appealed and sought a stay. Attorneys for the plaintiffs, however, filed a 30-page response Monday that contended Torres will not be successful in the appeal and that a stay should be rejected.
"Appellant (Torres) argues he is likely to succeed on the merits of this appeal. This is not true," the plaintiffs' attorneys wrote. "This case presented uncomplicated legal and factual issues, all of which could be resolved expeditiously by the trial court. Because the appellant is unlikely to succeed on the merits of this appeal, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to stay."
While the appeals court did not rule Monday on the underlying issues in the lawsuit, Torres' campaign touted the decision to grant a stay.
"This legal fight was a desperate attempt by Democrats to protect Rep. Kathy Castor from having to defend her failed policies," Torres said in a prepared statement Tuesday. "My campaign has been moving full speed ahead, and I am proud to be the dedicated conservative fighter on your ballot."
The state Division of Elections last week removed Torres from a list of active candidates on its website after Cooper's ruling. But Torres was listed as an active candidate Tuesday morning. Other candidates in the race are Republicans James Judge and Sam Nashagh and Democrat Christopher Bradley.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSmartmatic, Newsmax Seek Favorable Ruling in 2020 Election Defamation Case
4 minute readMedley Candidate Never Slept in the City, But Miami Judge Rules He Can Run in Elections
4 minute readAppeals Court to Weigh If Fla. Lawmakers Should be Shielded From Testifying
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 2What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 3Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 4Judge Blasts Authors' Lawyers in Key AI Suit, Says Case Doomed Without Upgraded Team
- 5Federal Judge Won't Stop Title IX Investigation Into Former GMU Law Professor
Who Got The Work
Burr & Forman partner Garry K. Grooms has entered an appearance for 4M Acquisitions and Wallace D. Tweden in a pending environmental lawsuit. The action, filed July 22 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the McKellar Law Group and Mark E. Martin LLC on behalf of Tennessee Riverkeeper, contends that the defendant's violated the Clean Water Act and Tennessee Water Quality Control Act by allowing for the discharge of pollutants into waters of the U.S. without obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge permit. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger, is 3:24-cv-00886, Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Tweden et al.
Who Got The Work
Ramsey M. Al-Salam, Gene W. Lee and Stevan R. Stark of Perkins Coie have entered appearances for R-Pac International in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 12 in New York Southern District Court by PinilisHalpern LLP and Friedman Suder & Cooke on behalf of Adasa Inc, asserts a single patent related to wireless sensors used for tagging products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, is 1:24-cv-06102, Adasa Inc. v. R-Pac International LLC.
Who Got The Work
Walmart has tapped lawyer Nicole M. Wright of Zausmer PC to defend a pending product liability lawsuit. The action was filed Aug. 12 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Wolfe Trial Lawyers on behalf of a plaintiff claiming burns from a defective propane tank. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Leitman, is 2:24-cv-12100, Hill v. Ferrellgas, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Kevin Simpson and James Randall of Winston & Strawn have stepped in to represent Comcast in a pending consumer class action. The case, filed Aug. 11 in Georgia Northern District Court by Kaufman PA, contends that the defendant placed pre-recorded debt collection phone calls to the plaintiff in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee, is 1:24-cv-03553, Pond v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC.
Who Got The Work
Potter Anderson & Corroon partners Christopher N. Kelly and Kevin R. Shannon have stepped in to represent cloud computing company Fastly and its top executives in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 23 in Delaware District Court by deLeeuw Law and Bragar Eagel & Squire on behalf of Mark Sweitzer, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that revenue growth in 2023 was primarily driven by a 'consolidation trend' in which companies simplified operations by reducing the number of content delivery network vendors under management, thereby reducing competition and increasing the defendant's market share. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gregory B. Williams, is 1:24-cv-00969, Sweitzer v. Nightingale et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250