Ruling Against Congressional Candidate Put on Hold
The appeals court did not explain its reasons for granting the stay, But in a motion filed last week, Torres' attorneys pointed, in part, to the fast-approaching Aug. 23 primary.
August 10, 2022 at 11:52 AM
4 minute read
With the primary election only two weeks away, an appeals court has put on hold a circuit judge's ruling that said a Tampa Bay-area congressional candidate is ineligible to run because he did not properly qualify.
The 1st District Court of Appeal on Monday approved a request by Republican candidate Jerry Torres for a stay of the ruling by Leon County Circuit Judge John Cooper. The stay will remain in effect as the Tallahassee-based appeals court considers whether Torres is eligible to run in Congressional District 14 in Hillsborough and Pinellas counties.
The appeals court did not explain its reasons for granting the stay, But in a motion filed last week, Torres' attorneys pointed, in part, to the fast-approaching Aug. 23 primary.
"Voting is already happening. Absent a stay, elections supervisors will inform voters that Mr. Torres is disqualified and that votes for him do not count," the motion said. "He will lose endorsements, fundraising opportunities, and the ability to campaign on equal footing with other candidates. An immediate stay is necessary to prevent these harms, preserve the status quo, and ensure that Mr. Torres can have meaningful relief if this court reverses (Cooper's ruling against Torres)."
Cooper ruled that Torres was ineligible because qualifying paperwork was not properly notarized, and the circuit judge denied a request for a stay. The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by plaintiffs including the Florida Democratic Party and former state Rep. Sean Shaw, D-Tampa.
Cooper ordered Secretary of State Cord Byrd to decertify Torres as a candidate in Congressional District 14, where Republicans are trying to unseat U.S. Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Fla. He also ordered county supervisors of elections to comply with requirements about giving notice to voters and tabulating votes "when a candidate has been disqualified."
The circuit judge found that Torres submitted three campaign oaths, including oaths notarized by Mississippi notaries. But Cooper wrote that Torres was not present when the documents were notarized.
"Defendant Torres did not sign the oath form before a notary public or by using online notarization," Cooper wrote in Thursday's 15-page order. "He did not fill out the form. He was never placed under oath. He never even spoke to the notaries who purported to witness his signature. Although the second and third oath forms indicated defendant Torres signed them on June 16, 2022, before a notary in Mississippi, he admits he was in Sierra Leone at the time."
Torres' attorneys quickly appealed and sought a stay. Attorneys for the plaintiffs, however, filed a 30-page response Monday that contended Torres will not be successful in the appeal and that a stay should be rejected.
"Appellant (Torres) argues he is likely to succeed on the merits of this appeal. This is not true," the plaintiffs' attorneys wrote. "This case presented uncomplicated legal and factual issues, all of which could be resolved expeditiously by the trial court. Because the appellant is unlikely to succeed on the merits of this appeal, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to stay."
While the appeals court did not rule Monday on the underlying issues in the lawsuit, Torres' campaign touted the decision to grant a stay.
"This legal fight was a desperate attempt by Democrats to protect Rep. Kathy Castor from having to defend her failed policies," Torres said in a prepared statement Tuesday. "My campaign has been moving full speed ahead, and I am proud to be the dedicated conservative fighter on your ballot."
The state Division of Elections last week removed Torres from a list of active candidates on its website after Cooper's ruling. But Torres was listed as an active candidate Tuesday morning. Other candidates in the race are Republicans James Judge and Sam Nashagh and Democrat Christopher Bradley.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Will Happen to the Nominees in Florida's Southern and Middle Districts?
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250