Sanofi, GSK and Pfizer Lose Billions in Value on Zantac Woes
Zantac was a once-popular antacid that has drawn a flurry of U.S. personal-injury lawsuits alleging it causes cancer.
August 11, 2022 at 12:45 PM
3 minute read
Health CareSanofi, GSK Plc and Haleon Plc extended their declines and have lost a combined $40 billion in market value since Tuesday's close amid mounting concerns about litigation around the recalled heartburn drug Zantac.
Sanofi fell as much as 13% on Thursday in trading volumes nearly 10 times the average volume, taking its two-day decline to 20%, the steepest drop ever over that time frame. GSK slid as much as 12% in London, while its recent spinoff Haleon slumped 13%. GSK shares were at one point showing their worst one-day retreat since February 1998, before paring losses.
GSK declined to comment on stock moves and ongoing lawsuits around Zantac, while Haleon said it's not a party of the litigation proceedings and that it has never marketed the drug in any form in the U.S., either as Haleon or as GSK Consumer Healthcare. Sanofi didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
Zantac was a once-popular antacid that has drawn a flurry of U.S. personal-injury lawsuits alleging it causes cancer. Sanofi, GSK and Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, among many other generic drug makers, are accused in the lawsuits of failing to properly warn users about health risks.
Pfizer Inc., which owns more than a quarter of Haleon, declined as much as 4% in U.S. premarket trading and could wipe out roughly $11 billion if those losses hold in the cash market. Several Zantac-related lawsuits have been filed against Pfizer in various federal and state courts, according to a recent company filing.
A Pfizer spokesperson said the company sold Zantac only for a limited period of time and that it hasn't sold it in more than 15 years.
Highlighting an upcoming Illinois case on Aug. 22 and some key court trials in early 2023, Deutsche Bank analyst Emmanuel Papadakis warned on Thursday that the issues are likely to act as a short-term headwind for both GSK and Sanofi shares.
Indeed, the damages could possibly reach $10.5 billion to $45 billion, according to analysts at Morgan Stanley, based on similar litigation settlements in the past. "There is considerable uncertainty at this stage surrounding the potential total financial impact of the Zantac litigation," they wrote.
Zantac was withdrawn from the market in 2019 after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said it appears to produce unacceptably high levels of a cancer-causing chemical when exposed to heat for as little as five days.
UBS Group AG analyst Laura Sutcliffe warned that some investors are avoiding Sanofi until there is further clarity. Downgrading her rating to neutral from buy, she said the litigation in early 2023 may become an "overhang" for the stock.
Sanofi has previously downplayed the risks of the litigation, with executives saying on an earnings call last month that there's no reliable evidence that Zantac causes cancer and that plaintiffs won't be able to prove their claims.
Haleon said it has certain indemnification obligations to GSK and Pfizer, "which may include liabilities related to OTC Zantac," in a prospectus ahead of listing its shares in London last month. That's while Credit Suisse analysts flagged Haleon's involvement in Zantac litigation was limited.
Thyagaraju Adinarayan and Lisa Pham report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250