The Big Money Musk Sees in Lithium Is Getting Harder to Make
Elon Musk described lithium refining as the hard part in the complex process of getting raw materials out of the ground and into Tesla's cars.
August 19, 2022 at 02:33 PM
4 minute read
Elon Musk says there's big money to be made by turning raw lithium into battery chemicals, but shrinking profit margins suggest the mining end of the business might still be a better bet.
Musk last month described lithium refining as the hard part in the complex process of getting raw materials out of the ground and into Tesla Inc.'s cars. For those who can crack it, it's a "license to print money," he said.
And he was right: margins did spike earlier this year, as booming orders from carmakers drove a record surge in prices for the specialty chemicals produced by "merchant refiners," companies that purchase and process material from lithium producers.
But the refiners' profits can quickly wither if the cost of raw materials rises faster than the price of the lithium chemicals they sell. While China's COVID lockdowns have weighed on demand for finished products from battery- and automakers in recent months, the price of mined raw materials has continued to surge.
As a result, profit margins at lithium plants have tumbled. Processors are still generating historically strong earnings, but margins have dropped by more than half from a March peak, according to Fastmarkets Ltd, which tracks prices for lithium products and other commodities.
The reversal is a reminder of how refiners and the entire electric-vehicle supply chain are at the mercy of the miners and their ability to bring on new production quickly enough to meet spiraling demand. Delayed supply responses are commonplace in other commodities markets, which is why the lion's share of profits are typically made in mining, not refining.
"Merchant refining can be a pretty horrible place to be in any commodity market, because you can get squeezed at both ends," said Peter Hannah, a senior price development manager at Fastmarkets. "I don't think these margins will be a long-term feature of the market."
Producers, meanwhile, continue to earn big. Chile's SQM, the second-largest supplier, reported record quarterly profit late Wednesday and said it expects prices will remain high through the rest of the year.
While Musk's comments have thrust lithium refiners into the spotlight, Tesla and other carmakers are increasingly alert to the risk of a long-term mine-supply crunch. Carmakers including Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Co. have been signing a flurry of long-term supply deals for battery metals in recent months with both miners and processors, as spiking prices underscore the risk that EV expansion plans could stall without access to adequate raw materials.
In a strategy that goes against the grain of the industry's traditional just-in-time procurement practices, they're now increasingly striking deals with miners directly, even in cases where the projects are years away from production.
"There's no lack of lithium, but there just aren't enough projects that will be up and running in time to meet demand in that time frame," said Max Reid, a battery raw materials analyst at Wood Mackenzie. "We're reasonably confident that there will be a deficit opening up in 2030 due primarily due to lack of new investment in the early days of this decade."
Tesla has led the charge in shifting the industry's approach to sourcing, even buying mining rights in Nevada in 2020.
With prices for lithium chemicals holding at sky-high levels and mined raw materials known as spodumene continuing to surge, Musk has hinted at further forays, going so far as to offer an ultimatum to the industry on an investor call last month.
"If our suppliers don't solve these problems, then we will," he said.
Mark Burton reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecurities Claims Against Lilium N.V. for Electric Plane Production Delays Fail to Take Flight, Federal Judge Holds
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Getting Cameras in Federal Courts Will Take More than Logic
- 2Emerson Electric Opens Wallet to Reward New CLO for Fast Start
- 3Kirkland Hires Real Estate Finance Partners in New York
- 4Delaware Governor Names Magistrate Judge as Next Vice Chancellor
- 5Hagens Berman Accused of Withholding Share of $13M Award in Pharmaceutical Settlement
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250