Hyundai, Korean Battery Makers Bristle at Biden Climate Bill
South Korea's trade ministry is considering asking the U.S. to postpone the Inflation Reduction Act, even just for two or three years, during which time Hyundai could build a new EV plant and qualify for subsidies under the new rules.
August 24, 2022 at 01:13 PM
5 minute read
South Korea's Hyundai Motor and local battery makers are struggling with the Biden administration's historic climate and energy law that's aimed at containing the influence of Chinese companies in the global electric car industry and boosting domestic production of EVs.
The act, which has been signed into law by President Joe Biden, requires EV makers to assemble their cars in North America and quickly reduce their reliance on China for battery components and materials in order to get a maximum $7,500 in tax credits. That's a disaster for Korea: Hyundai and Kia don't have any operational electric car plants in the U.S. (and Hyundai specifically faces union resistance when it comes to overseas expansion) and Korean battery makers import more than 80% of minerals from China; mines typically take seven years or longer to come online.
Japanese automakers are at a similar disadvantage, having invested lots of money in the U.S. but not currently producing EVs there. With the exception of Nissan's Leaf, no other Japanese EV model would qualify for subsidies under the new rules.
South Korea's trade ministry is considering asking the U.S. to postpone the Inflation Reduction Act, even just for two or three years, during which time Hyundai could build a new EV plant, an official said last week. Hyundai is also mulling speeding up construction of a planned EV plant in Georgia, Yonhap News reported.
Korean government and company officials don't see the exclusion of Chinese rivals as an opportunity. The two rely on each other so much. It's not a new dilemma either. The U.S. is Korea's closest political ally, but China is its biggest trading partner and deeply involved in Korean supply chains.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen described U.S. efforts to diversify supply chains with "trusted partners" as "friend-shoring" during her visit to Seoul last month, adding the U.S. "cannot allow countries like China to use their market position in key raw materials, technologies, or products." South Korea is also being asked to join a kickoff meeting of the so-called Chip 4 Alliance, a new group of major chipmaking powers, along with the U.S., Taiwan and Japan.
According to Chul-Wan Park, a professor at Seojeong College who specializes in the auto industry, the Inflation Reduction Act could be a "huge opportunity for South Korea by excluding China, but unfortunately, no company is that well prepared for diversification." The US might "push Korea to join the Chip 4 Alliance in return for relaxing or delaying the IRA requirements."
Korea's Industry Minister Lee Chang-yang earlier this week said he was considering filing a complaint with the World Trade Organization against the act. Some 25 lawmakers in South Korea proposed a resolution against it, urging the U.S. not to "discriminate" against foreign electric car and battery makers.
As one analyst said, there's a feeling the U.S. is betraying South Korea, particularly given the huge investment that Korean companies have promised to make in U.S. Hyundai announced a plan to invest $5.5 billion to build an EV assembly and battery plant near Savannah, Georgia, and Korean battery makers have a series of plans for battery plants: four plants for General Motors, two for Stellantis and three for Ford.
The act will result in a loss of 100,000 jobs in South Korea and hurt profits at local auto-parts makers, Kweon Seongdong, a senior ruling party lawmaker said. That's in stark contrast to the around 35,000 jobs expected to be created in the U.S. by 34 Korean companies, mostly in the battery industry, according to U.S. lobby group Reshoring Initiative.
Another issue is that Hyundai will have to reduce its dependence on Chinese-made auto parts. South Korea imported about 35% of its total auto parts from China in 2021, according to the Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade.
"It will be hard to secure raw materials and components from the U.S. to meet the threshold to access the tax credits," BloombergNEF energy storage analyst Evelina Stoikou said. "In addition, companies will have to move fast as it takes time to build component and battery manufacturing capacity (up to three years) and the credits will be phased out in 2032."
Hyundai and Kia have become the largest EV makers behind Tesla in the U.S. this year, selling about 44,000 clean cars, according to BNEF. Korean battery makers are also supplying not only U.S. carmakers like Tesla, GM, Ford and Rivian, but also European names like Volkswagen and BMW.
Global carmakers have few other options to turn to if they aren't prepared to be more accommodating to Korean battery companies. All the top 10 battery makers are from Asia — six from China, three from Korea and Japan's Panasonic, according to SNE Research.
As Kim Pil-Soo, an automobile professor at Daelim University, put it: "It's not just a matter for Korean carmakers. U.S. carmakers like Ford and Tesla are also using Chinese minerals to lower the price of EVs. The IRA is a disaster for them too."
Heejin Kim reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecurities Claims Against Lilium N.V. for Electric Plane Production Delays Fail to Take Flight, Federal Judge Holds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
- 2How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About ,' Says Jennifer Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 3Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
- 4St. Ivo: Patron Saint of Lawyers
- 5Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250