Gen Z Wants to Ditch Corporate Jobs for Social Media Dreams
The drive to turn social media posts into sustainable income is highest among the youngest generation of workers, according to new research by Adobe Inc.
August 26, 2022 at 12:33 PM
5 minute read
America's youngest workers want to become business owners — just not in the way their parents might envision.
The drive to turn social media posts into sustainable income is highest among the youngest generation of workers, according to new research by Adobe Inc. About 45% of Gen Z creators surveyed said they aspire to own a business and make money from content shared online, according to the company's survey in May of more than 9,000 influencers and creators across nine countries.
Adobe defines creators as those who post social content with the aim of growing their online presence or to promote their creative work — anything from photography to music to NFTs. The influencers surveyed reported over 5,000 followers on their primary social media platform and earn money posting content.
Gen Z content creators and influencers are part of the wave of entrepreneurship that's accompanied the labor market shake-up of the past two years. While many Americans started businesses during the pandemic lockdown out of necessity, the streak has continued, driven by a desire for flexibility and greater control over one's financial future. A record 5.4 million new businesses were started in the U.S. last year, according to Census data. While the monthly rate has plateaued below its 2021 peak, it's remained far above pre-pandemic levels.
Although there's been much speculation around whether this surge in small business creation was an aberration or the start of a long-term reversal, "what we are seeing is that this trend shows no signs of abating," said Luke Pardue, an economist at payroll services platform Gusto.
The shifting dynamics are partly generational, he said. "Specifically among younger workers, we're seeing this trend that even amid a tight labor market workers aren't seeing wage gains that are keeping up with inflation, so they're moving to self-employment where they can determine their compensation a little more independently," said Pardue. "There isn't a lot that the 9-to-5 employment can allow in terms of achieving some of the milestones that were available to prior generations."
While millennials are experimenting with having a side hustle alongside a day job, Gen Z is focused more on making a project into a career, said Maria Yap, vice president of digital imaging applications at Adobe. "They're thinking, no — my regular job could be the thing that I'm passionate about."
Some colleges, such as Duke University, the University of Southern California and the University of Virginia, have responded to the shift in demand by offering classes on how to build successful social media enterprises.
The Adobe research suggests ditching the corporate ladder for the Instagram grid can be can bring in a six-figure income if done full time, though the reality is often more complicated.
Creators who monetize content make $61 per hour on average, according to Adobe. If done 40 hours a week, Adobe estimates this would translate to an annual income of $122,000. Influencers polled by Adobe make $81 per hour, which would parlay into about $162,000 if done full time.
Yet the boundaries are often blurred between hobbyists and hustlers, and most of the people polled by Adobe aren't full time. Content creators spend an average of nine hours per week and influencers spend an average of 15 hours per week making content. In the U.S., six in 10 creators hold full-time jobs, Adobe found. If creators were to ditch their day jobs, it's not clear whether they would be able to drum up enough business to fill a 40-hour workweek.
Public perception is often that content creators and influencers with more than 10,000 followers are earning a significant income, but this is far from the reality, said Qianna Smith Bruneteau, founder of the American Influencer Council, a trade association for social media content professionals.
Of those who create content full time, only about 12% make more than $50,000 a year, according to a global survey of more than 9,500 creators published in April by Linktree, a link-sharing platform popular with influencers. The living wage in Manhattan is almost $53,000, according to MIT's living wage calculator.
While some creators and influencers stumble into success, for others it can take countless hours of hard work without pay to build up a following, according to Bruneteau. "To produce content every single day, in a video-first environment — it takes tremendous work," she said. That can mean years of free content before a creator sees dividends. "When you're just starting out, you can't expect to earn immediately. Like any small business, it takes about two years to reach break-even," Bruneteau said.
Even with a large audience, monetizing content isn't easy — it takes substantial business acumen to pitch yourself to brands and establish partnerships. And successful creators often must work to generate as many income streams as possible across platforms, from ad revenue to merchandise to workshops and classes.
Tejas Hullur, 21, is an influencer based in New York City. After starting out posting about crypto and finance over the summer of 2020, Hullur said he hit his stride posting about the creator economy itself. "It's very ironically meta, in the sense of making content for other creators," he said.
Like many of his peers, Hullur quickly had to diversify his revenue stream after the income from brand deals turned out to be spotty. Still, the unpredictability of income makes it difficult to plan effectively, especially with an economic downturn threatening companies' marketing budgets. And career longevity for influencers is an issue. Often, internet fame — and the money that comes along with it — doesn't last forever.
"We play in this world of hype. It can feel like you're on top of the world," Hullur said. "I've seen this time and time again — the amount of TikTokers who were on top of the world in 2020, who still have a fully monetizable and flourishing business today is, I would say, under 5%. It comes up and then goes down."
Jo Constantz reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
3 minute readUS Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250