Gen Z Wants to Ditch Corporate Jobs for Social Media Dreams
The drive to turn social media posts into sustainable income is highest among the youngest generation of workers, according to new research by Adobe Inc.
August 26, 2022 at 12:33 PM
5 minute read
America's youngest workers want to become business owners — just not in the way their parents might envision.
The drive to turn social media posts into sustainable income is highest among the youngest generation of workers, according to new research by Adobe Inc. About 45% of Gen Z creators surveyed said they aspire to own a business and make money from content shared online, according to the company's survey in May of more than 9,000 influencers and creators across nine countries.
Adobe defines creators as those who post social content with the aim of growing their online presence or to promote their creative work — anything from photography to music to NFTs. The influencers surveyed reported over 5,000 followers on their primary social media platform and earn money posting content.
Gen Z content creators and influencers are part of the wave of entrepreneurship that's accompanied the labor market shake-up of the past two years. While many Americans started businesses during the pandemic lockdown out of necessity, the streak has continued, driven by a desire for flexibility and greater control over one's financial future. A record 5.4 million new businesses were started in the U.S. last year, according to Census data. While the monthly rate has plateaued below its 2021 peak, it's remained far above pre-pandemic levels.
Although there's been much speculation around whether this surge in small business creation was an aberration or the start of a long-term reversal, "what we are seeing is that this trend shows no signs of abating," said Luke Pardue, an economist at payroll services platform Gusto.
The shifting dynamics are partly generational, he said. "Specifically among younger workers, we're seeing this trend that even amid a tight labor market workers aren't seeing wage gains that are keeping up with inflation, so they're moving to self-employment where they can determine their compensation a little more independently," said Pardue. "There isn't a lot that the 9-to-5 employment can allow in terms of achieving some of the milestones that were available to prior generations."
While millennials are experimenting with having a side hustle alongside a day job, Gen Z is focused more on making a project into a career, said Maria Yap, vice president of digital imaging applications at Adobe. "They're thinking, no — my regular job could be the thing that I'm passionate about."
Some colleges, such as Duke University, the University of Southern California and the University of Virginia, have responded to the shift in demand by offering classes on how to build successful social media enterprises.
The Adobe research suggests ditching the corporate ladder for the Instagram grid can be can bring in a six-figure income if done full time, though the reality is often more complicated.
Creators who monetize content make $61 per hour on average, according to Adobe. If done 40 hours a week, Adobe estimates this would translate to an annual income of $122,000. Influencers polled by Adobe make $81 per hour, which would parlay into about $162,000 if done full time.
Yet the boundaries are often blurred between hobbyists and hustlers, and most of the people polled by Adobe aren't full time. Content creators spend an average of nine hours per week and influencers spend an average of 15 hours per week making content. In the U.S., six in 10 creators hold full-time jobs, Adobe found. If creators were to ditch their day jobs, it's not clear whether they would be able to drum up enough business to fill a 40-hour workweek.
Public perception is often that content creators and influencers with more than 10,000 followers are earning a significant income, but this is far from the reality, said Qianna Smith Bruneteau, founder of the American Influencer Council, a trade association for social media content professionals.
Of those who create content full time, only about 12% make more than $50,000 a year, according to a global survey of more than 9,500 creators published in April by Linktree, a link-sharing platform popular with influencers. The living wage in Manhattan is almost $53,000, according to MIT's living wage calculator.
While some creators and influencers stumble into success, for others it can take countless hours of hard work without pay to build up a following, according to Bruneteau. "To produce content every single day, in a video-first environment — it takes tremendous work," she said. That can mean years of free content before a creator sees dividends. "When you're just starting out, you can't expect to earn immediately. Like any small business, it takes about two years to reach break-even," Bruneteau said.
Even with a large audience, monetizing content isn't easy — it takes substantial business acumen to pitch yourself to brands and establish partnerships. And successful creators often must work to generate as many income streams as possible across platforms, from ad revenue to merchandise to workshops and classes.
Tejas Hullur, 21, is an influencer based in New York City. After starting out posting about crypto and finance over the summer of 2020, Hullur said he hit his stride posting about the creator economy itself. "It's very ironically meta, in the sense of making content for other creators," he said.
Like many of his peers, Hullur quickly had to diversify his revenue stream after the income from brand deals turned out to be spotty. Still, the unpredictability of income makes it difficult to plan effectively, especially with an economic downturn threatening companies' marketing budgets. And career longevity for influencers is an issue. Often, internet fame — and the money that comes along with it — doesn't last forever.
"We play in this world of hype. It can feel like you're on top of the world," Hullur said. "I've seen this time and time again — the amount of TikTokers who were on top of the world in 2020, who still have a fully monetizable and flourishing business today is, I would say, under 5%. It comes up and then goes down."
Jo Constantz reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Delray Beach Financial Adviser Indicted in Alleged Illegal Tax Shelter Scheme
McGlinchey Opens Third Florida Office in Tampa, Hopes to Tap Region's Talent
2 minute readBuy-Now-Pay-Later Company Affirm Hit With Data Breach Class Action After Cyberattack on Banking Partner
Trending Stories
- 1How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
- 2Trump Seeks to Have Georgia Election Case Dismissed, Cites Presidential Immunity
- 3Elon Musk Has a Lot More than a Tornetta Appeal to Resolve in Delaware
- 4Case Will Test If Wrongful-Death Suit Can Be Brought for Fetus
- 5Venezuelan Man Convicted in Laken Riley's Killing Asks for a New Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250