Florida Lawmakers Back Insurer Ratings Proposal
The president of ratings agency president of Demotech issued a statement that called the state move "an unnecessary response to a problem that does not exist."
September 12, 2022 at 10:42 AM
4 minute read
InsuranceWith one lawmaker likening Florida's troubled property-insurance market to a "mountain tumbling," a legislative panel Friday approved a proposal to spend $1.5 million to look at alternatives for insurers to get adequate financial ratings.
The move came after state officials in July publicly questioned the ratings agency Demotech, Inc., over the possibility that it would downgrade insurers.
Adequate financial ratings are important, in part, because mortgage-industry giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac require homes to be insured by sound companies. If insurers lose satisfactory financial ratings, homeowners could be forced to find other coverage.
The Joint Legislative Budget Commission, which is made up of House and Senate members, approved the $1.5 million proposal to hire a consultant that will study additional options for insurers to get ratings. The consultant will provide options to Gov. Ron DeSantis and lawmakers for potential consideration during the 2023 legislative session.
Julie Jones, a deputy state chief financial officer, told lawmakers the work could include looking at creating a "public rating agency for (the) property and casualty insurance industry focusing on the Florida market, to make it more unique for our insurance needs."
"Our hope is that we're going to go forward with a process that is going to protect the insured properties in this state and benefit the insurance companies so we have more competition," Jones said.
But Joseph Petrelli, president of Demotech, issued a statement that called the state move "an unnecessary response to a problem that does not exist."
"Since 1996 in Florida, Demotech has provided neutral, unbiased ratings to property insurers, among the approximately 50,000 such ratings we have produced across the country," Petrelli said. "Our review and analysis process has remained consistent throughout this time. Currently, at least four rating organizations acceptable to the government-sponsored mortgage enterprises operate in Florida and countrywide, and a research effort on rating alternatives could be accomplished at no cost to the taxpayers by reviewing existing Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae sellers (guides) or servicer guides."
The issue emerged in July when Insurance Commissioner David Altmaier and state Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis questioned Demotech and warned that widespread downgrades could affect homeowners across the state. Patronis sharply criticized Demotech in letters to leaders of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
"If (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) de-authorized a sizeable percentage of Florida's insurers based on the dubious ratings of one company, it would create financial chaos for millions of Floridians," Patronis wrote.
At the time, Altmaier said "approximately 17" property insurers could be affected — a number that has been repeatedly used. But Petrelli disputes that Demotech threatened to downgrade 17 companies.
In an email to The News Service of Florida, Petrelli said the number of carriers being evaluated in July was "fluid."
"In July, 2022, we utilized the same process that we had in place in FL every quarter since 1996," he wrote. "This was the only time in 26 years that anything like this has occurred."
The ratings issue comes amid upheaval in the state's property-insurance market, with carriers dumping policies and seeking large rate increases because of financial losses. Five carriers have been deemed insolvent since February.
During Friday's meeting, Sen. Linda Stewart, D-Orlando, supported the proposal to look for ratings options and pointed to the problems in the market.
'I feel like the insurance market is like a mountain tumbling," Stewart said. "Everything is happening, it seems like, all at one time, and this is one of those things that we need to address."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOnce the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute readAttorneys, Health Care Officials Face Nearly $80M RICO Suit Over Allegedly Fabricated Spreadsheet
Navigating Florida Property Insurance Claims in a Post-Fee-Shifting World
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Sanctions Attorney for 'Frivolously' Claiming All Nine Personal Injury Categories in Motor Vehicle Case
- 2Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
- 3Crypto Hacker’s $65 Million Scam Ends in Indictment
- 4Trump's Inspectors General Purge Could Make Policy Changes Easier, Observers Say
- 5Supporting Our Supreme Court Justices in the Guardianship Part
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250