Hedge Funds Betting Musk Will Be Forced to Buy Twitter
Elon Musk, the world's richest person and a renowned sparring partner with regulators over securities laws, is trying to back out of his agreement to buy Twitter for $44 billion.
September 14, 2022 at 01:08 PM
5 minute read
Hedge funds, including David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital and Pentwater Capital Management, are wagering that Elon Musk won't get his way this time.
Musk, the world's richest person and a renowned sparring partner with regulators over securities laws, is trying to back out of his agreement to buy Twitter Inc. for $44 billion. Several hedge funds have purchased stock, options or bonds, speculating that Musk will lose a trial scheduled to begin Oct. 17 in Delaware Chancery Court.
That could be a bright spot for a type of hedge fund having a tough year. So called event-driven funds, which often bet on mergers and acquisitions, are down 4% on average, according to research firm PivotalPath.
The law is clear, Einhorn told investors in a letter last month. And "if it were anyone other than Musk, we would handicap the odds of the buyer wiggling out of the deal to be much less than 5%," he said.
The money manager, whose firm bought Twitter shares at an average price of $37.24, dismissed speculation that the court would rule in Musk's favor to avoid embarrassment should the man commanding a net worth of more than $250 billion simply choose to ignore its decision.
"We think that the incentive of the Delaware Chancery Court, the preeminent and most respected business court in the nation, is to actually follow the law and apply it here," Einhorn wrote.
An attorney for Musk and a Twitter spokesperson declined to comment.
Pentwater, led by Matthew Halbower, bought more than 18 million Twitter shares in the second quarter, making his firm the seventh-biggest owner with a 2.4% stake. He told CNBC in July that he expected Musk, who offered to buy Twitter for $54.20 a share, to be forced to complete the purchase.
So far, the market appears to be supporting that view.
On Tuesday, when U.S. equity markets plunged the most in more than two years, Twitter shareholders voted to approve the merger, and the stock was the second-best performer in the S&P 500, gaining 0.8% to $41.74. While it hasn't closed above $44.50 since Musk first suggested in May that he might renege, some analysts and investors, including Einhorn, have said the stock would tumble to $20 if the deal falls apart.
The idea that Musk, the chief executive officer of both Tesla Inc. and SpaceX, could one day own Twitter took root in early April. That's when he disclosed he had acquired 9% of the social media giant, making him its largest individual shareholder. Within weeks, the parties announced they'd reached an agreement. But less than a month later, Musk was threatening to pull out, accusing Twitter of understating the prevalence of bots on its platform. On July 8, he said he was terminating the deal.
Since then, Musk's lawyers have pointed to allegations from whistleblower Peiter Zatko, Twitter's former head of security, saying "egregious deficiencies" in the company's defenses against hackers and privacy issues meant that Twitter had breached the conditions in the merger agreement.
An article in the New Yorker this week said that after Zatko's claims became public, his former colleagues were contacted by researchers, sometimes offering money for information on the cybersecurity executive. At least a few of the researchers were gathering information for investment firms with bets on the deal, according to the report.
Some investors and analysts suggest the parties could reach a settlement before the trial, with Musk paying closer to $50 a share.
Carronade Capital Management, a $900 million multistrategy credit hedge fund, invested in various Twitter debt and equity securities, wagering that the deal will ultimately be done, either after a trial or through a settlement, according to people familiar with the matter. A representative for the firm declined to comment.
Kellner Capital's Chris Pultz said Musk and Twitter might agree to forgo a trial for a discount of 10% to 15% from the original deal price.
"Anything more than that and the Twitter board may say they would rather take their chances going to court," said Pultz, whose firm manages about $250 million.
In April, when Musk brought in outside financing, including from fellow billionaires Larry Ellison and Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, Pultz acquired a small Twitter stake. When the stock plunged in July, approaching its low for the year, Kellner bolstered its position by 40%.
Cabot Henderson, a merger strategist at Jones Trading, said Twitter now has less incentive to accept a lower price because the company has been winning in pretrial hearings, making the odds of a settlement lower than he previously predicted.
"At this point, people are mentally preparing that this thing is actually going to trial now," Henderson said. "It's hard to sometimes parse through the posturing, but it does seem there's been a real hardening of attitudes."
Katherine Burton, Hema Parmar and Yiqin Shen report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
3 minute readUS Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Trending Stories
- 1Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 2Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 3Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 4Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 5Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250