Insurers Temporarily Blocked from Dropping Policies
Wednesday's order came amid widespread concerns about how the Category 4 Hurricane Ian will affect an already-troubled insurance market.
September 29, 2022 at 10:50 AM
4 minute read
Insurance
Insurance Commissioner David Altmaier on Wednesday issued an emergency order that will temporarily prevent property insurers from dropping customers in the aftermath of Hurricane Ian.
The order will suspend cancellations or non-renewals of policies for two months.
"Between September 28, 2022, and November 28, 2022, no insurer or other entity regulated under the Florida Insurance Code shall cancel or non-renew, or issue a notice of cancellation or nonrenewal of a policy or contract of insurance covering a property or risk in Florida, except at the written request or written concurrence of the policyholder," the order said.
Also, the order will temporarily shield homeowners from losing policies if their properties are damaged in Hurricane Ian. Under it, insurers will be barred from canceling or non-renewing policies for at least 90 days after the properties are repaired.
Altmaier issued similar orders after Hurricane Irma plowed through much of the state in 2017 and Hurricane Michael devastated parts of Northwest Florida in 2018.
But Wednesday's order came amid widespread concerns about how the Category 4 Hurricane Ian will affect an already-troubled insurance market. Six carriers have been deemed insolvent since February, and other companies have dropped tens of thousands of policies to try to stem financial losses, with many of those customers turning to the state-backed Citizens Property Insurance Corp. for coverage.
The hurricane made landfall Wednesday afternoon in Southwest Florida and is projected to barrel through Central Florida before exiting into the Atlantic Ocean.
Gov. Ron DeSantis expressed confidence that Citizens, which was created as an insurer of last resort and has nearly 1.1 million policies, will not have a problem paying claims. Citizens has its largest concentrations of policies in Southeast Florida and the Tampa Bay area, both of which appear to have avoided the worst of Ian.
"I've spoken with Citizens. Their view, looking at the modeling of how much they would have to pay out … they have about a $6 (billion) to $7 billion surplus," DeSantis said, referring to money available to pay claims. "They think that once this storm clears, and they pay all the claims, they'll still have between a $4 (billion) or $5 billion surplus. So, they feel good that they'll be solvent through this."
Bigger questions surround how Ian could affect private insurers. DeSantis called a special legislative session in May to try to shore up the industry, with lawmakers, in part, agreeing to spend $2 billion to provide what is known as a "layer" of reinsurance to property insurers.
Reinsurance, which is essentially backup insurance for carriers, plays a vital role in the Florida market. The $2 billion added to reinsurance that carriers bought from reinsurance companies and from the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, a state-run program.
A commentary released Tuesday night by the AM Best financial-ratings agency said Hurricane Ian will be the "first test" for the $2 billion in reinsurance. The commentary also pointed to potentially broader reinsurance problems stemming from Ian.
"Property insurance in Florida is already a tough market, and this impending hurricane looks to make conditions only more demanding," Christopher Graham, a senior industry analyst for AM Best, said in a prepared statement. "Reinsurance rates are already increasing, and a catastrophic hurricane will likely put more pressure on reinsurers to raise rates."
DeSantis in recent days has said a significant part of Ian's damage will come from flooding, which is largely insured through the National Flood Insurance Program, rather than by private companies. He also pointed Wednesday to reinsurance that the private insurers have.
"For the private carriers, a lot of it is going to depend on their financial situations," he said. "The regulators, when they go and approve their policies, they do different stress tests. So, this year, they (insurers) all had to pass a stress test for a major storm going into Tampa Bay. They had to show they were capitalized enough to do that. They all, of course, have reinsurance and our CAT Fund (the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund) is $17 billion. It's never been higher."
— News Service Assignment Manager Tom Urban contributed to this report.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readBack-To-Back Hurricanes' Impact on Florida Legal Work Will Go Beyond Usual Suspects
5 minute readHolland & Knight Snags 2 Insurance Partners in New York and Philadelphia From Goodwin
3 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 2Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 3Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 4'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 5Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250