Murdoch Plan for Empire Pushes Fox Down Most Since 2020
Rupert Murdoch, the 91-year-old patriarch of the global media empire, is seeking to reunite the parent of Fox News with that of the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post.
October 18, 2022 at 02:02 PM
5 minute read
Rupert Murdoch's plan to combine News Corp. and Fox Corp., recreating the conservative-leaning media goliath that he split apart nine years ago, drew mixed reactions on Wall Street.
Several analysts said the potential recombination is unlikely to solve one of the key problems facing Fox and News Corp.: low valuations relative to their peers. While News Corp. gained 3.4% amid a broad market rally, Fox's Class A shares dropped 9.4% for the biggest decline since March 2020.
The 91-year-old patriarch of the global media empire is seeking to reunite the parent of Fox News with that of the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post, the companies said Friday. His family trust holds about 40% of the voting stock of each company, and recombining them would save corporate expenses and allow the bigger entity to more easily promote new businesses, such as sports betting, across multiple media outlets.
For Fox, the benefit of "greater scale and modest cost synergies is in our view largely offset by increased complexity," Benjamin Swinburne wrote at Morgan Stanley. As for News Corp., colleague Andrew McLeod said there is "strategic merit in a potential merger" but that the timing of any asset sales or spinoffs would be critical.
So far no one from the Murdoch clan, which includes Rupert's six children, has spoken publicly about the deal. The move would likely consolidate power in the hands of his son Lachlan Murdoch, 51, currently the chief executive officer of Fox. Son James Murdoch, a former executive at the family media empire, resigned from the News Corp. board in 2020, citing disagreements over news judgment and strategy.
Rupert Murdoch and his family trust proposed the combination to their respective boards. A majority of the non-family shareholders would have to approve, and that could give an opportunity for anyone opposed to the deal to speak out. Special committees of independent directors will explore possible terms and there's no certainty a deal will be made.
Lachlan is the favorite to eventually control the entire Murdoch empire. James, whatever misgivings he may have about the organization's politics, wouldn't be able to do much to stop the consolidation if he wanted to. But as a prominent family member, his opinion could carry weight with shareholders. James Murdoch declined to comment.
Kannan Venkateshwar, an analyst with Barclays Plc, said in a research note Sunday that he found the proposal a "head-scratcher." Neither company has businesses that are all that complementary to each other and the deal is unlikely to change what has been a historical discount placed on the Murdoch media empire, relative to peers, he wrote. Both companies are trading at a bit more than six times their 2023 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.
Separately, Irenic Capital Management favors a break up of News Corp.'s media and real estate listings businesses, according to a person familiar with the matter, confirming a report in the New York Times on Sunday evening. The activist fund holds a $150 million stake in the company and is one of the 10 largest holders of its class B shares, which include voting rights.
Irenic and its partners have engaged with the Murdoch family and believe that splitting up News Corp. could unlock value, contending that the company is trading at a significant discount to a sum-of-the-parts valuation that should be about $34 a share, the person said. Irenic is prepared to oppose a transaction that undervalues News Corp., the person added.
While combining Fox and News Corp. is "not an overly obvious transaction," analysts at Wells Fargo & Co. said merging the companies could deliver synergies in content and programming. UBS Group AG also noted that News Corp.'s US divisions such as Dow Jones and the New York Post may benefit from cross promotion with Fox's television businesses, while there could be potential synergies with Fox's cable network division.
"If we've learned one thing from analyzing Murdoch assets historically, it's that the family looks to maximize value and is not emotionally tied to any properties," Wells Fargo analysts including Steven Cahall and Wojtek Majerczak wrote in a note Sunday.
Rupert Murdoch usually gets his way in the business he began building seven decades ago. He serves as chairman of Fox and executive chairman of News Corp. He also has the biggest share of votes on the family trust, which includes a say for his four eldest children: Lachlan; James; and two daughters, Prudence and Elisabeth.
The family's internal squabbles, which served as inspiration for the HBO series "Succession," have been well chronicled.
James, 49, and his wife, Kathryn, have been critical of the media empire's coverage of issues such as climate change. Kathryn sits on the board of the 19th, a news organization devoted to women's issues and public policy, and they've helped fund the Bulwark, an anti-Trump conservative news outlet. They are also big donors to Democratic candidates.
Lachlan, meanwhile, defended the split-up of the two companies in a 2019 presentation to investors. He said the split allowed the company to return to its roots as an "agile, imaginative, entrepreneurial, sometimes contrarian company." He even went so far to say as he "could see no logic in reversing the benefits of those defining actions."
His thinking has changed, according to people familiar with the company's plans. The media landscape has shifted with more consumers viewing content online. Fox and News Corp. have both grown their digital offerings in recent years and Lachlan has the view that he can use both the traditional and new media to launch and promote businesses in the future.
Christopher Palmeri reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute readO'Melveny Secures Global Clearances for Korean Air-Asiana Merger
Big Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readDeal Watch: Are Only 'A Handful' of Law Firms Positioned Well After Citi-Apollo Partnership?
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250