Abortion Pill Startups Face Challenges Raising Cash
The founders of two abortion pill companies say that raising money from investors has been complicated.
October 19, 2022 at 02:39 PM
4 minute read
Startups that provide abortion pills by mail saw a groundswell of attention after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade earlier this year. Today, though, the founders of two abortion pill companies say that raising money from investors has been complicated.
Hey Jane, which provides Mifepristone pills for inducing abortions to patients in eight states, recently closed a $6.1 million funding round, the company told Bloomberg. The round, which was oversubscribed, came mostly from female investors, Hey Jane said.
Co-founder and CEO Kiki Freedman said that during the fundraising process she found that many investors were interested in backing businesses expanding access to abortion care, but added, "I'd be lying if I said it was easy." Numerous firms told her they couldn't invest in a business focused on abortion access because their limited partners, who supply capital, would be wary of the politics involved. "They may not want to ruffle feathers with their own investors," she said.
On Tuesday, President Joe Biden vowed to enshrine Roe v. Wade in federal law, a promise that hinges on the Democrats' ability to hold the House and make gains in the Senate in the upcoming midterm elections. Until then, access to an abortion is subject to the political climate in each state.
About 20,000 people have received abortion medication from Hey Jane since its launch in early 2021. The funding brings the startup's total cash raised to $9.7 million, a relatively small sum in the world of venture capital, but the round exceeded the amount Hey Jane initially set out to raise. Freedman said the funding will help grow Hey Jane's staff and expand its virtual care model to include other areas like postpartum depression. The company plans to introduce that program in all 50 states by the end of next year. Investors in Hey Jane's latest funding round include New York-based VC the Helm, Ulu Ventures and Amboy Street Ventures, which focuses on sexual health startups and women's health technology.
Over the summer, after reports that Supreme Court was planning to overturn Roe v. Wade, companies seeking to expand access to abortion care saw an influx of inbound interest from investors wanting to talk about their businesses. Choix Inc., another company that mails pills that patients can use to induce an abortion, raised $1 million in seed funding over the summer from Oregon-based Elevate Capital.
But since then, Choix has struggled to raise more money. Earlier this month, the startup launched a crowdfunding campaign on Republic, a site that allows people to invest in companies as well as other projects. Choix went the crowdfunding route after failing to raise the additional $1 million it was hoping to bring in as part of its summer round. (Freedman said Hey Jane also raised some money from investors on tech investing platform AngelList, and found about 100 backers there.)
Choix's co-founder and CEO, Cindy Adam, said that like Freedman, she found that investors were hesitant to fund abortion-related companies because of worries over their limited partners' politics. Another common reason VCs passed was that they're looking for profitability, particularly during a market downturn. "Lots of investors want to see profits," Adam said. "We're focused on quality care and taking care of our patients over profits."
Carli Sapir, a Hey Jane investor and founding partner at Amboy Street Ventures, said that startups catering to women are often overlooked. In the case of abortion access, the topic is so politicized that "a lot of people won't touch this space for fear of repercussions," she said. Still, Sapir is optimistic about the future of startups focused on women's health. "I know this space is underserved and underfunded," she said. "But there's a huge shift in the landscape right now because women are becoming decision-makers in the VC landscape and directing the flow of capital."
Priya Anand reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
3 minute readUS Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250