Abortion Pill Startups Face Challenges Raising Cash
The founders of two abortion pill companies say that raising money from investors has been complicated.
October 19, 2022 at 02:39 PM
4 minute read
Startups that provide abortion pills by mail saw a groundswell of attention after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade earlier this year. Today, though, the founders of two abortion pill companies say that raising money from investors has been complicated.
Hey Jane, which provides Mifepristone pills for inducing abortions to patients in eight states, recently closed a $6.1 million funding round, the company told Bloomberg. The round, which was oversubscribed, came mostly from female investors, Hey Jane said.
Co-founder and CEO Kiki Freedman said that during the fundraising process she found that many investors were interested in backing businesses expanding access to abortion care, but added, "I'd be lying if I said it was easy." Numerous firms told her they couldn't invest in a business focused on abortion access because their limited partners, who supply capital, would be wary of the politics involved. "They may not want to ruffle feathers with their own investors," she said.
On Tuesday, President Joe Biden vowed to enshrine Roe v. Wade in federal law, a promise that hinges on the Democrats' ability to hold the House and make gains in the Senate in the upcoming midterm elections. Until then, access to an abortion is subject to the political climate in each state.
About 20,000 people have received abortion medication from Hey Jane since its launch in early 2021. The funding brings the startup's total cash raised to $9.7 million, a relatively small sum in the world of venture capital, but the round exceeded the amount Hey Jane initially set out to raise. Freedman said the funding will help grow Hey Jane's staff and expand its virtual care model to include other areas like postpartum depression. The company plans to introduce that program in all 50 states by the end of next year. Investors in Hey Jane's latest funding round include New York-based VC the Helm, Ulu Ventures and Amboy Street Ventures, which focuses on sexual health startups and women's health technology.
Over the summer, after reports that Supreme Court was planning to overturn Roe v. Wade, companies seeking to expand access to abortion care saw an influx of inbound interest from investors wanting to talk about their businesses. Choix Inc., another company that mails pills that patients can use to induce an abortion, raised $1 million in seed funding over the summer from Oregon-based Elevate Capital.
But since then, Choix has struggled to raise more money. Earlier this month, the startup launched a crowdfunding campaign on Republic, a site that allows people to invest in companies as well as other projects. Choix went the crowdfunding route after failing to raise the additional $1 million it was hoping to bring in as part of its summer round. (Freedman said Hey Jane also raised some money from investors on tech investing platform AngelList, and found about 100 backers there.)
Choix's co-founder and CEO, Cindy Adam, said that like Freedman, she found that investors were hesitant to fund abortion-related companies because of worries over their limited partners' politics. Another common reason VCs passed was that they're looking for profitability, particularly during a market downturn. "Lots of investors want to see profits," Adam said. "We're focused on quality care and taking care of our patients over profits."
Carli Sapir, a Hey Jane investor and founding partner at Amboy Street Ventures, said that startups catering to women are often overlooked. In the case of abortion access, the topic is so politicized that "a lot of people won't touch this space for fear of repercussions," she said. Still, Sapir is optimistic about the future of startups focused on women's health. "I know this space is underserved and underfunded," she said. "But there's a huge shift in the landscape right now because women are becoming decision-makers in the VC landscape and directing the flow of capital."
Priya Anand reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
3 minute readUS Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Trending Stories
- 1$19.1M Verdict: 'Most Accurate Settlement Demand I Ever Made'
- 2Grassley Picks Former GOP Policy Committee Attorney to Be Chief Nominations Counsel
- 3Insurers in Crosshairs After Police-Brutality Judgment
- 4Reed Smith Opening Atlanta Office With 37 Lawyers From Two Firms
- 5Coerced Confessions and the Burden of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250