Banks Face Bigger Deposit Insurance Payments From FDIC
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said the increase was meant to boost the industry's overall ratio of protection to insured deposits, a measure that fell as Americans saved more during the COVID-19 pandemic.
October 20, 2022 at 02:35 PM
3 minute read
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the U.S. agency that protects savings accounts, is requiring lenders to increase how much they contribute to a fund that protects consumers from bank failures despite fierce industry objections to the move.
American banks will have to start paying bigger deposit insurance assessment rates starting in the first quarter of 2023 under the rule change approved on Tuesday. The FDIC said the two-basis-point increase was meant to boost the industry's overall ratio of protection to insured deposits, a measure that fell as Americans saved more during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Although the FDIC says the change is needed to better protect consumers, banks say the plan doesn't account for how inflation and rising interest rates will organically reduce savings and deposits. Account balances ballooned as American households received government stimulus checks and changed spending patterns since 2020.
"Overall, the banking industry continues to report strong earnings and is well positioned to absorb this modest increase in assessment rates," FDIC acting Chairman Martin Gruenberg said during a meeting. The change "should not impact lending or credit availability in any meaningful way," he added.
The regulator is getting a jump on the issue well ahead of a 2028 mandated deadline, said Tim Ghriskey, a senior portfolio strategist at Ingalls & Snyder in New York. Ghriskey said banks currently being flush with cash makes it possible for the FDIC to try to increase the reserve ratio.
The Bank Policy Institute, American Bankers Association and Consumer Bankers Association said in a letter this week that recent data show there has already been a decline in the rate of insured deposits, contradicting the FDIC assumption that deposits would remain elevated. They say the changes, which were proposed in June, are unnecessary and could harm the economy because they'll ultimately discourage lending.
"The problem is likely to fix itself early next year, so there is no need to raise the rate now, which would make credit more expensive for small business and consumers at the same time the U.S. is potentially entering into a recession," the banking groups said. Banks have complained about increases before.
The FDIC says it's required to boost the ratio of protection to insured deposits, a measure known as the Deposit Insurance Fund reserve ratio, to 1.35%. The regulator has said the metric stood at 1.23% in March. The FDIC has said its long-term goal is 2%.
Katanga Johnson reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
3 minute readUS Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250