'Ready for Ron' Committee Sues in FEC Petition Dispute
The Miami-based group alleges that a Federal Election Commission advisory opinion violates the First Amendment by preventing it from providing the petition to Gov. Ron DeSantis.
November 03, 2022 at 01:42 PM
3 minute read
A political committee trying to draft Gov. Ron DeSantis to run for president in 2024 has filed a lawsuit against the Federal Election Commission in a dispute about a petition with more than 80,000 signatures.
The Miami-based "Ready for Ron" committee alleges that a commission advisory opinion violates the First Amendment by preventing it from providing the petition to DeSantis.
The Sept. 28 advisory opinion said that providing the petition while DeSantis is "testing the waters" for a presidential run or after he becomes a candidate would violate a campaign-contribution limit because of the value of the information. The opinion did not reach a conclusion about whether the petition could be provided to DeSantis before he enters what is known under federal regulations as a "testing the waters" period.
The Ready for Ron lawsuit, filed last week in federal court in Washington, D.C., accused the commission of taking "federal campaign finance law to an unconstitutional extreme."
"A signed political petition is pure political speech," the 42-page lawsuit said. "The federal government may neither prevent a draft committee from soliciting and gathering signatories' names and contact information to attempt to persuade someone to run for office or remain a candidate for office, nor bar a potential candidate's supporters from associating together to express their political support for that person by providing their names and contact information."
While the commission did not reach a conclusion on providing the petition before DeSantis might test the waters, the lawsuit indicated the committee is concerned it could face civil penalties or criminal prosecution if it provides the petition during that time.
DeSantis, who is running for reelection for governor Tuesday, is widely viewed as a potential 2024 Republican presidential candidate. But he has been coy about the issue and has not taken the "testing the waters" step, which would include complying with federal campaign-contribution regulations while doing such things as polling and traveling.
In the advisory opinion, the commission said that Ready for Ron would violate a $2,900 contribution limit if it provided the petition with names and contact information of people who signed it.
"The contact information in R4R's [Ready for Ron's] petition would be of significant value to Governor DeSantis not only because of its expensive development costs, but also because it exclusively includes persons who are advocating in favor of Governor DeSantis running for president," part of the advisory opinion said. "Accordingly, R4R may not provide the contact information to Governor DeSantis without charge if and when he becomes a federal candidate because the value of the information would exceed the contribution limits."
The lawsuit said Ready for Ron, which longtime Republican operative and presidential adviser Ed Rollins helped launch, has spent $25,000 to $50,000 a week on ads and plans to continue through the 2024 election.
"Under the First Amendment, the commission may not bar RFR from providing a petition to Governor DeSantis encouraging him to run for president, simply because it contains the names and addresses of its signatories," the lawsuit said. "Federal campaign finance law does not require anonymous political speech."
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250