Tenure Review Could Be Tied to Florida Race Instruction Law
The proposed tenure-review regulation would make "any violation" of the Stop WOKE law one of seven criteria that would be considered. If faculty members' performance is deemed unsatisfactory, they could face termination.
November 04, 2022 at 11:02 AM
4 minute read
A controversial law designed to restrict the way certain race-related topics can be taught in Florida classrooms could factor into a new tenure-review process for university professors, under a proposal that higher-education officials will consider next week.
The proposed regulation links two laws that the Legislature and Gov. Ron DeSantis approved this year.
One of the laws allowed the state university system's Board of Governors to adopt a regulation that would require tenured professors to undergo a "comprehensive post-tenure" review every five years.
The board on Nov. 10 is slated to consider a draft of the regulation. The proposal lays out criteria that would be included in professors' reviews and makes clear that compliance with the race-related instruction law would be considered.
The race-related instruction law (HB 7), which DeSantis dubbed the "Stop Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees Act," or "Stop WOKE Act" — was one of the most-contentious issues of the 2022 legislative session and has drawn federal-court challenges. The law enumerates several concepts that would constitute discrimination if they were included in instruction.
For example, the law targets instruction that "compels" students to believe that they bear "personal responsibility for and must feel guilt, anguish, or other forms of psychological distress because of actions, in which the person played no part, committed in the past" by members of the same race or sex.
The proposed tenure-review regulation would make "any violation" of the Stop WOKE law one of seven criteria that would be considered. If faculty members' performance is deemed unsatisfactory, they could face termination.
Faculty members would receive a "performance rating" under the process. Deans would recommend ratings, which could be accepted, rejected or modified by university chief academic officers.
"For each faculty member who receives a final performance rating of 'does not meet expectations,' the appropriate college dean, in consultation with the faculty member's department chair, shall propose a performance improvement plan to the chief academic officer," the proposal said.
Professors who are directed to follow improvement plans would be given up to a year to meet requirements laid out in the plans.
"Each faculty member who receives a final performance rating of 'unsatisfactory' shall receive a notice of termination from the chief academic officer," the proposal also said.
The United Faculty of Florida has strongly opposed the race-related instruction law. The union in July published an article on its website titled, "HB 7: What UFF Members Need To Know About The "Stop WOKE Act," calling the law "horrendous" and advising faculty members about its potential impacts.
"Please know that if you, as a UFF member, experience any discipline, harm, or other adverse action from your supervisor or institution in response to your attempts to navigate the prohibitions in HB 7, you should immediately contact your local union leaders for support," an introductory part of the post said.
Democrats who opposed the measure during the legislative session argued, in part, that it was being pushed by DeSantis for political reasons, as the governor has made his fight against critical race theory and "indoctrination" in schools a linchpin of his education agenda.
The tenure-review law (SB 7044) was sponsored by former Sen. Manny Diaz, R-Hialeah, and Sen. Ray Rodrigues, R-Estero. Diaz later left the Legislature to become state education commissioner, while Rodrigues next week will become chancellor of the university system.
Part of the proposed regulation suggests that tenured university employees' political views would not be a factor in the performance reviews.
"The review shall not consider or otherwise discriminate based on the faculty members' political or ideological viewpoints," the proposal said.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Wrestles With Disabled Ex-Firefighter's Discrimination Case
Essential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
Southwest Airlines Faces $100M Class Action Over Pay Periods
Trending Stories
- 1New York Judge Steps Down After Conviction for Intoxicated Driving
- 2Keys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
- 3Houston Law Firm Files $250K Breach of Contract Suit Against 2 Former Lawyers
- 4The Week in Data Feb. 3: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 5Mass Tort Cases: Challenges for Plaintiff’s and Defense Counsel
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250