Cryptocurrencies. Credit: Igor Faun/Shutterstock.com Crypto Exchange Tokens Pose 'Extreme' Risk, BOE's Cunliffe Says
Exchange-issued crypto tokens such as bankrupt FTX Group's FTT can pose "extreme" risks when accepted by their issuers as collateral, Bank of England Deputy Governor Sir Jon Cunliffe said.
November 21, 2022 at 01:30 PM
2 minute read
Exchange-issued crypto tokens such as bankrupt FTX Group's FTT can pose "extreme" risks when accepted by their issuers as collateral, Bank of England Deputy Governor Sir Jon Cunliffe said.
"A firm accepting its own unbacked cryptoasset as collateral for loans and margin payments, as there are indications may have happened with FTX, creates extreme 'wrong-way' risk—i.e. when the exposure to a counterparty increases together with the risk of the counterparty's default," Cunliffe said in a speech on Monday.
Cunliffe said the volatility of unbacked cryptoassets like exchange tokens makes them vulnerable to runs, exacerbating their price swings. "Indeed, in the FTX case, there are indications that it could have been a run on its crypto coin, FTT, which triggered the collapse," Cunliffe added.
The failure of FTX.com earlier this month has rocked the crypto ecosystem, eroding trust in centralized exchanges and leaving 50 customers with claims of more than $21 million each. FTX unraveled quickly after Changpeng "CZ" Zhao, the founder of rival Binance, announced plans to unload a roughly $530 million holding of FTT.
As a result, decentralized finance platforms and protocols—where traders rely on lines of code to manage the platform's risk automatically—have seen an 11% uptick in volumes this month. Investors have also flocked to using offline wallets known as cold storage for their crypto, as they fear further contagion among centralized platforms.
Cunliffe said he had "yet to be convinced that the risks inherent in finance can be effectively managed" by DeFi's reliance on code over human input. "That scepticism is greater if the activity in question is the trading, lending, etc. of super volatile assets without intrinsic value," he added.
This is because such protocols have yet to display their robustness to handle risk and the potential to amplify fire sales "at scale and over time," Cunliffe said.
Moreover, because some platforms have stakeholders who earn revenue from their operation, it's also not clear if they are "are truly decentralized."
Emily Nicolle reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
3 minute read
St. Thomas University Settles With Fired Professor Who Had Alleged Academic Freedom Violations and Discrimination
9 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1The New Hybrid Legal Professional: Equal Parts Law and Business
- 2Norton Rose Lawyers Accused of Accessing Confidential Material in Internal IT Probe
- 3'The Front Line of Regulating AI': Manatt's Brandon Reilly on CPPA's Move to Adopt New Data Broker and AI Rules
- 4Newsmakers: New Trial Attorney David Young Joins Reynolds Frizzell LLP
- 5The Political Rally as Media Genre
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
