Crypto Lender Sued for Blocking 2021 Withdrawals by Wealthy Investors
Cryptoasset lender Nexo Capital Inc. was sued in London by investors who allege they were blocked from withdrawing parts of their $126 million in assets from the exchange in March 2021, when one bitcoin was worth more than $54,000.
November 22, 2022 at 12:30 PM
2 minute read
Cryptoasset lender Nexo Capital Inc. was sued in London by investors who allege they were blocked from withdrawing parts of their $126 million in assets from the exchange in March 2021, when one bitcoin was worth more than $54,000.
Nexo froze the accounts of two brothers and their cousin in late March 2021 and pressurized them into selling its own token back at a heavily discounted rate, lawyers for the investors said in the lawsuit. Owen and Jason Morton, and their cousin Shane Morton said they were forced to sell the tokens at about a 60% discount of the market price, they alleged.
For its part, Nexo said the claims are opportunistic and come from a group of wealthy, sophisticated investors who made "lucrative transactions."
"All transactions, including the sale of their Nexo tokens, were completed in good faith, were documented and were accepted as final by the claimants at execution," the exchange operator said in a Nov. 11 blog post.
Nexo, founded in 2018 and managed by former Bulgarian politician Antoni Trenchev, has faced several legal challenges in 2022 as the crypto lending industry found itself at the forefront of the sector's worst bear market in years. The firm rebuffed speculation last month that it might join former rivals Celsius Network and Voyager Digital in heading for bankruptcy, after Nexo received cease and desist orders from eight US states in September that alleged the platform was offering interest-earning accounts without registering the investment products as securities.
The Mortons purchased Nexo tokens worth millions of dollars in 2019 and 2020 and used the platform to trade other cryptocurrencies and tokens to get interest-earning benefits on the exchange, they said.
The three investors decided to withdraw from platform in late 2020 as they were concerned about Nexo Capital's compliance with regulations in U.S., U.K. and European Union, they said in the filing.
When Nexo used "illegitimate threat" by disabling functions to withdraw, the Mortons agreed to convert their tokens to Tether's USDT, a stablecoin pegged to the dollar, according to the lawsuit. That same day the trio emptied their accounts that included over 350 Bitcoins, over 50 million in USDT, and millions of other tokens. They seek damages to make good the losses.
Upmanyu Trivedi reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Hawk Tuah Girl’ $440 Million Meme Coin Collapse Sparks Legal Battle
4 minute readState Attorney General Faces Federal Courtroom Test Over Crypto Mining Ban
4 minute readShaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250