Florida Judge Ponders Fate of Suspended Prosecutor
Gov. Ron DeSantis suspended Andrew Warren in an executive order that, in part, pointed to a letter Warren signed pledging to avoid enforcing a new law preventing abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.
December 02, 2022 at 08:44 AM
4 minute read
State and Local Government
A three-day trial over Gov. Ron DeSantis' suspension of a twice-elected Hillsborough County state attorney wrapped on Thursday, but a federal judge presiding over the lawsuit said it could be weeks before he releases a decision.
U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle said he may not have time before Dec. 19 to fully delve into Andrew Warren's allegations that the governor's action violated his First Amendment speech rights.
Warren, who was first elected in 2016 and re-elected in 2020, told reporters outside a federal courthouse in Tallahassee that he looked forward to Hinkle's decision.
"A trial is a search for the truth. And over the past three days, everyone had the opportunity to hear the truth," said Warren, who testified on Tuesday.
DeSantis' legal counsel declined to comment after the trial.
The governor drew national attention on Aug. 4 when he suspended Warren, a Democrat, for "incompetence and willful defiance of his duties."
Warren's team has maintained the governor's action was politically motivated.
During closing arguments on Thursday, attorney David O'Neil, who represents Warren, told Hinkle that DeSantis' suspension of Warren effectively was "an opportunity to kill three policy birds with one stone" by silencing a voice of opposition on the issues of abortion and medical treatment for transgender people and by displaying a tough-on-crime attitude.
DeSantis suspended Warren in an executive order that, in part, pointed to a letter Warren signed pledging to avoid enforcing a new law preventing abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.
Also, the governor targeted a statement Warren joined condemning the criminalization of transgender people and gender-affirming care.
George Levesque, an attorney who represents DeSantis, said Warren's actions were in the role of a "policy maker" and shouldn't be considered a First Amendment violation.
But Hinkle noted that Warren was an elected official and expressed a need for politicians and candidates to be able to "express their views."
Larry Keefe, an adviser to DeSantis known as the state's "public safety czar" who testified on Tuesday and Wednesday, was a key figure in this week's trial.
According to Keefe, DeSantis in December asked him if any state attorneys in Florida weren't following the law. Keefe, a former U.S. attorney appointed by then-President Donald Trump, said he started an "ad hoc" inquiry into the issue by querying law-enforcement officials around the state.
"By the end of January or February, all roads were consistently leading to Mr. Warren," he said.
Warren "was regarded as a state attorney whose approach to his job was harmful," who was "hostile and antagonistic toward law enforcement" and who was "negatively impacting law enforcement and their ability to protect people," Keefe said.
But Hinkle on Wednesday pressed Keefe on whether he only sought input from Republican law enforcement officials and individuals involved in GOP politics.
As a prosecutor, Hinkle asked, "You would never do an investigation talking to just people on one side of the case."
"That's true," said Keefe, who repeatedly called his probe a "look into" the issue that was not an "investigation."
On Thursday, Hinkle wondered if Keefe's actions could be viewed as a "one-sided inquiry" focused on law enforcement officials' dissatisfaction with the criminal-justice reform advocate's policies rather than on how Warren operated his office.
Hinkle also pointed out that an early draft of DeSantis' executive order included a reference to progressive billionaire and political donor George Soros, as well as the Democratic Party.
DeSantis also referenced Soros-backed prosecutors during an appearance on FOX News the night of Warren's suspension, the judge observed.
But Hinkle, who often interrupted Levesque during his closing remarks on Thursday, advised the attorneys not to read too much into his line of questioning.
"I don't know who is going to win," the judge said.
During opening arguments on Tuesday, attorney Jean-Jacques Cabou, who represents Warren, told Hinkle that DeSantis suspended the prosecutor "because of what he said and what he believes and because they're different from what the governor believes."
But Levesque on Tuesday argued that the Republican governor suspended Warren "because he was refusing to enforce the law."
Warren's stance against the 15-week abortion restriction was "tantamount to a veto of state law," Levesque argued.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250