Florida Judge Ponders Fate of Suspended Prosecutor
Gov. Ron DeSantis suspended Andrew Warren in an executive order that, in part, pointed to a letter Warren signed pledging to avoid enforcing a new law preventing abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.
December 02, 2022 at 08:44 AM
4 minute read
State and Local GovernmentA three-day trial over Gov. Ron DeSantis' suspension of a twice-elected Hillsborough County state attorney wrapped on Thursday, but a federal judge presiding over the lawsuit said it could be weeks before he releases a decision.
U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle said he may not have time before Dec. 19 to fully delve into Andrew Warren's allegations that the governor's action violated his First Amendment speech rights.
Warren, who was first elected in 2016 and re-elected in 2020, told reporters outside a federal courthouse in Tallahassee that he looked forward to Hinkle's decision.
"A trial is a search for the truth. And over the past three days, everyone had the opportunity to hear the truth," said Warren, who testified on Tuesday.
DeSantis' legal counsel declined to comment after the trial.
The governor drew national attention on Aug. 4 when he suspended Warren, a Democrat, for "incompetence and willful defiance of his duties."
Warren's team has maintained the governor's action was politically motivated.
During closing arguments on Thursday, attorney David O'Neil, who represents Warren, told Hinkle that DeSantis' suspension of Warren effectively was "an opportunity to kill three policy birds with one stone" by silencing a voice of opposition on the issues of abortion and medical treatment for transgender people and by displaying a tough-on-crime attitude.
DeSantis suspended Warren in an executive order that, in part, pointed to a letter Warren signed pledging to avoid enforcing a new law preventing abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.
Also, the governor targeted a statement Warren joined condemning the criminalization of transgender people and gender-affirming care.
George Levesque, an attorney who represents DeSantis, said Warren's actions were in the role of a "policy maker" and shouldn't be considered a First Amendment violation.
But Hinkle noted that Warren was an elected official and expressed a need for politicians and candidates to be able to "express their views."
Larry Keefe, an adviser to DeSantis known as the state's "public safety czar" who testified on Tuesday and Wednesday, was a key figure in this week's trial.
According to Keefe, DeSantis in December asked him if any state attorneys in Florida weren't following the law. Keefe, a former U.S. attorney appointed by then-President Donald Trump, said he started an "ad hoc" inquiry into the issue by querying law-enforcement officials around the state.
"By the end of January or February, all roads were consistently leading to Mr. Warren," he said.
Warren "was regarded as a state attorney whose approach to his job was harmful," who was "hostile and antagonistic toward law enforcement" and who was "negatively impacting law enforcement and their ability to protect people," Keefe said.
But Hinkle on Wednesday pressed Keefe on whether he only sought input from Republican law enforcement officials and individuals involved in GOP politics.
As a prosecutor, Hinkle asked, "You would never do an investigation talking to just people on one side of the case."
"That's true," said Keefe, who repeatedly called his probe a "look into" the issue that was not an "investigation."
On Thursday, Hinkle wondered if Keefe's actions could be viewed as a "one-sided inquiry" focused on law enforcement officials' dissatisfaction with the criminal-justice reform advocate's policies rather than on how Warren operated his office.
Hinkle also pointed out that an early draft of DeSantis' executive order included a reference to progressive billionaire and political donor George Soros, as well as the Democratic Party.
DeSantis also referenced Soros-backed prosecutors during an appearance on FOX News the night of Warren's suspension, the judge observed.
But Hinkle, who often interrupted Levesque during his closing remarks on Thursday, advised the attorneys not to read too much into his line of questioning.
"I don't know who is going to win," the judge said.
During opening arguments on Tuesday, attorney Jean-Jacques Cabou, who represents Warren, told Hinkle that DeSantis suspended the prosecutor "because of what he said and what he believes and because they're different from what the governor believes."
But Levesque on Tuesday argued that the Republican governor suspended Warren "because he was refusing to enforce the law."
Warren's stance against the 15-week abortion restriction was "tantamount to a veto of state law," Levesque argued.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
Trending Stories
- 1Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
- 2In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 3A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
- 4Clifford Chance Adds Skadden Rainmaker in London
- 5Latham, Kirkland and Paul Weiss Climb UK M&A Rankings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250