Migrant Relocation Program Draws Another Legal Challenge
Immigrant-advocacy groups are accusing Gov. Ron DeSantis of an "attempt to legalize state-sponsored harassment" in challenging an "unauthorized alien" relocation program approved by state lawmakers.
December 05, 2022 at 12:24 PM
5 minute read
Accusing Gov. Ron DeSantis of an "attempt to legalize state-sponsored harassment," immigrant-advocacy groups filed a federal lawsuit challenging an "unauthorized alien" relocation program approved by state lawmakers earlier this year.
The lawsuit makes a series of allegations, including violations of constitutional due-process and equal-protection rights.
The Florida Legislature, at DeSantis' request, steered $12 million in the state budget to the Department of Transportation "for implementing a program to facilitate the transport of unauthorized aliens from this state consistent with federal law."
The money for the program, which didn't appear in early versions of the state budget during the 2022 legislative session, was tucked into the appropriations bill while House and Senate leaders were reconciling differences in their proposed state spending plans. The budget was passed a few days later.
The lawsuit in part maintains that the inclusion of the money for the relocation program in the budget violated the state Constitution. "An appropriations act is not the proper place for the enactment of general public policies on matters other than appropriations," the 28-page legal complaint said.
The program "should have been scrutinized through the legislative process substantive legislation, not slipped into the annual appropriations act," the plaintiffs' lawyers wrote.
The plan drew international headlines in September after state transportation officials dipped into the fund to pay for charter flights to transport about 50 migrants from San Antonio, Texas, to Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts. The planes stopped briefly in North Florida before landing on the island.
DeSantis, who is widely considered a potential 2024 Republican presidential candidate, frequently rails against the Biden administration's policies and blasts the president for an influx of immigrants at the southern U.S. border.
The lawsuit filed Wednesday in the Middle District of Florida is one of several legal challenges to the flights and the program, including a potential class-action lawsuit filed in Massachusetts on behalf of migrants who say they were tricked into getting on the planes.
Plaintiffs in the latest legal challenge are three nonprofit organizations that support immigrants in Florida: The Florida Immigrant Coalition; Americans for Immigrant Justice Inc., or AI Justice; and Apopka-based Hope CommUnity Center, Inc.
The lawsuit alleges in part that the Florida effort unconstitutionally discriminates against Black and Hispanic people or "unauthorized aliens" or both.
"Whether located in Texas, Florida, or parts unknown, there is no doubt that the intended targets of the 'relocation program' are people of color arriving from nations south of the U.S./Mexico border," the complaint said. "Spending $615,000 to transport asylum-seekers from Texas to Massachusetts does not further a legitimate interest, it merely perpetuates xenophobia and hate by targeting Latin American and Caribbean migrants."
The lawsuit, which names DeSantis and Florida Department of Transportation Secretary Jared Perdue as defendants, also accused DeSantis of having "consistently targeted immigrants of Latin American descent."
"The discriminatory intention behind this law is clear to see when not read in a vacuum," the lawsuit said, pointing to recent efforts by Florida lawmakers to target so-called sanctuary cities.
DeSantis' spokeswoman Taryn Fenske defended the program.
"The relocation program was funded by interest from federal COVID dollars and lawfully executed under an appropriation of the Florida state legislature (that, incidentally, had bipartisan support). This program does not violate federal law. We will continue to defend the state's actions against these politically motivated, unsound lawsuits," she said in an email.
The relocation program has forced the advocacy groups to divert resources from other programs to respond to an onslaught of requests for legal and other assistance from people "who are concerned about their and/or family members' possible transportation out of Florida by state officials," according to the lawsuit.
The legal challenge also alleges that the state's relocation program conflicts with complex federal immigration laws and regulations.
"This coordinated national system of tracking and processing noncitizens in proceedings before [the Department of Homeland Services] or the Immigration Court is upended and thrown into chaos when individuals who are required to appear before a federal agency in one location are unable to do so due to state intervention," the plaintiffs' lawyers wrote. "Thus, defendants interfere with the regular enforcement of immigration law when they transport someone out of Florida."
The "interference is uniquely egregious" because the state transportation department and its contractors are "ill-equipped to determine" who has the legal authority to remain in the country, the lawsuit said. "The federal power to determine immigration policy is well settled and federal governance of immigration and noncitizen status is extensive and complex."
"Though dressed as a state budget item," the program "is an effort to backhandedly control national immigration, and, as such, it is unconstitutional," the complaint said.
The plaintiffs' legal team includes Southern Poverty Law Center attorneys; Massachusetts-based lawyers George Leontire and Felicia Carboni; and Ronald S. Sullivan Jr., director of Harvard University's Criminal Justice Institute.
Dara Kam reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Close Our Borders?' Senate Judiciary Committee Examines Economics, Legal Predicate for Mass Deportation Proposal
3 minute readAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readThe Canadian Influx: How Migration to Florida Is Shaping the South Florida Real Estate Market
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250