Watch Leveraged Loans as Canary in Credit Coal Mine, Traders Say
For most of this year, buying loans seemed like a smart bet, because they carry floating interest rates and pay higher yields as central banks tighten the money supply.
December 05, 2022 at 02:34 PM
5 minute read
Investors watch leveraged loans for the first signs that aggressive central-bank rate hikes are starting to hit companies hard. They also brace for more FTX-like blowouts in the private equity industry and expect investment grade to do well next year.
A majority of 291 respondents to the latest MLIV Pulse survey said leveraged loans would be the canary in the coal mine to indicate that corporate credit quality is getting worse.
Any trouble for leveraged loans would represent a key shift in this credit cycle. For most of this year, buying loans seemed like a smart bet, because they carry floating interest rates and pay higher yields as central banks tighten the money supply. Even if loan prices fell a bit, the rising yields were enough to leave investors down just 0.9% for a year where most other markets are down double digits. And corporate balance sheets were still relatively strong, even for junk-rated companies.
But now companies seem more likely to default, and some investors would rather cut back on credit risk. About 28% of survey respondents expect defaults to jump significantly if U.S. rates peak at or below 5%, which is about where the market bets the Federal Reserve will stop hiking, based on Fed funds futures. Another 63% see defaults surging if rates peak above 5%.
"While loans have performed well in an extremely challenging year, the path going forward is more problematic," said Christian Hoffmann, a portfolio manager for Thornburg Investment Management. "As we get closer to short-term rates falling and defaults rising, the market could lose interest in the asset class."
Part of the problem is the same feature that made loans attractive to investors: floating rates, which are now forcing highly indebted companies to make higher interest payments. And most investors expect a stagflation or deflationary recession next year, weighing on company revenues. Many money managers would rather bet on interest rates falling by buying longer-term investment-grade company bonds.
The U.S. leveraged loan market is only a few decades old, so there isn't robust data about how it performs during recessions. The debt fell precipitately in the Global Financial Crisis and again during the pandemic. In the 2001 recession, returns for the Morningstar LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan index, including interest payments and price movements, were more or less zero.
But tighter credit conditions will hurt a wide array of highly indebted companies. Default rates for U.S. leveraged loans could rise to 9% next year if the Fed stays on its aggressive monetary-policy path, according to UBS strategist Matt Mish.
Even if many investors have bought loans this year, the debt has still faced some pressure. Prices began to dip after Russia invaded Ukraine in February, introducing fresh concerns about energy prices and global economic growth. U.S. leveraged loans were trading at 99 cents on the dollar in January, and have since dropped to about 93 cents.
The epic collapse of the FTX crypto empire has shone a light on aggressive risk-taking and slack due diligence in the venture-capital industry. Some 94% of MLIV Pulse respondents think that further blowups will follow the bankruptcy of FTX as years of easy credit give way to a tougher business and market environment.
A more vulnerable credit market means that loan investors have to be particularly assiduous about doing their homework, said Frank Ossino, bank loan sector head at Newfleet Asset Management.
"Credit selection is going to be critical," Ossino said. "As we enter a downward cycle, risk assets will be impacted and loans – as a credit risk asset class – will naturally be a participant."
As leveraged loans are becoming less interesting to some investors, investment-grade bonds are poised to gain ground. More than half of respondents said they expected investment-grade credit to outperform next year, while about a fifth said they expected junk bonds to do better. Longer-term high-grade bonds generated returns of more than 9% in November, their best month since 2008.
Wall Street banks have also been talking lately about potentially high returns for investment-grade credit in 2023. Bank of America sees the debt generating total gains of close to 13% next year in the U.S., based on its index.
UBS said that credit can offer once-in-a-decade returns, recommending macro trades including going long blue-chip company debt compared with leveraged loans. But timing the trades is critical, strategists led by Mish said, as recession looms and won't reach every economy at the same time.
Investor optimism about high-grade credit has been increasingly reflected in risk premiums. Spreads for U.S. investment-grade debt have narrowed about 35 basis points since mid-October, according to Bloomberg index data.
Investment-grade credit is typically far more sensitive than junk bonds to changes in benchmark yields, because high-grade debt tends to take longer to mature and pays less interest. That makes investment-grade debt a better bet when yields are falling, as they have been in recent weeks.
Investment-grade bonds in dollars have returned 8.7% since Oct. 21, compared with 5.2% for high yield. High-grade debt is still on course for its worst year on record.
Olivia Raimonde and Sebastian Boyd report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
3 minute readUS Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250