Florida Medical Board Clears Doctor in Medical Pot Probe
The proceedings against the Tallahassee-area doctor, who was one of the first physicians in Florida to become eligible to order medical marijuana for patients, have been closely watched in the state's medical cannabis community.
December 14, 2022 at 01:35 PM
5 minute read
Health CareA state medical board has cleared a doctor who ordered medical marijuana for two undercover investigators posing as patients, finding the Florida Department of Health failed to prove wrongdoing.
The Department of Health sought to strip physician Joseph Dorn of his medical license for five years, permanently ban him from ordering medical marijuana and impose a $10,000 fine.
Administrative Law Judge W. David Watkins twice found that Dorn had complied with state law and recommended that the health department drop the charges against the 69-year-old doctor.
State health officials instead asked the Florida Board of Medicine to impose sanctions on the doctor, who is affiliated with the Medical Marijuana Treatment Clinics of Florida, by approving numerous exceptions to Watkins' rulings, which were recommended orders under administrative law.
But at a Dec. 2 meeting, the Board of Medicine rejected each of the agency's requests and dismissed the case.
The proceedings against the Tallahassee-area doctor, who was one of the first physicians in Florida to become eligible to order medical marijuana for patients, have been closely watched in the state's medical cannabis community.
"I do feel a little vindicated, but then on the other hand, I've suffered professionally," Dorn told The News Service of Florida in a phone interview.
The physician said that, with his career at stake, he had "a lot of sleepless nights" in the five years since the health department launched its probe.
"At my age, I could have retired by now, and I probably would have retired if it weren't for this case, but I was determined not to because it not only impacts me, it impacts all of MMTC. It impacts every physician," Dorn said.
Ryan Andrews, an attorney who represents Dorn, said the Department of Health's actions "have hurt Dr. Dorn tremendously" and the physician intends to seek attorney fees and other damages.
"Basically, they ruined Dorn's reputation and that of his business," Andrews told the News Service.
The proposed penalties against Dorn, who has practiced in Florida for more than three decades, stemmed from a 2019 complaint alleging that the physician violated state law by failing to conduct physical examinations of "Patient O.G." and "Patient B.D."
During a visit with Dorn in 2018, investigator Ben Lanier, who posed as O.G., handed the physician a handwritten medical record saying that he had been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder by the military a decade earlier.
Lanier, who was one of the state's witnesses during an October hearing before Watkins, said he told Dorn he had anxiety after serving in Kandahar, Afghanistan, where the doctor's son had served in the military. Lanier testified that he had never served in the military or been to Afghanistan.
Health officials accused Dorn of failing to "appropriately vet his patients" and follow a 2017 law requiring physicians to use certain procedures before determining patients are eligible for medical marijuana, such as deciding that its use would outweigh potential health risks.
Addressing the Board of Medicine at the Dec. 2 meeting, Kristen Summers, an attorney for the Department of Health, argued that Dorn should be punished for employing a "trick or scheme" in the practice of medicine.
"The department has alleged that MMTC of Florida deliberately structured itself to facilitate the distribution of marijuana to individuals in the state of Florida, regardless of whether the consumer qualified to receive medical marijuana pursuant to the statutory definition," Summers told the board.
While Dorn was accused of failing to perform physical examinations, Andrews argued during the October hearing that Dorn conducted a "visual examination" of the undercover investigators and that nothing in the law requires a hands-on evaluation.
Watkins agreed, finding that observing and meeting a patient and reviewing medical records and patient-intake forms constituted a physical examination.
Summers, however, urged the board to scrap the judge's interpretation of the law.
"It is the department's position that looking at a patient is not a physical examination," she argued. "We're not looking to see what is inappropriate or inadequate or a complete physical examination. This is a binary issue."
But the Board of Medicine, which regulates physicians, adopted Watkins' "conclusions of law."
Before the dismissal of the charges, Andrews said health officials examined records of more than two dozen of Dorn's patients and found no evidence that the Tallahassee-based doctor had "done anything wrong or violative of the statute."
Andrews also blasted health officials for creating fake records for the undercover agents .
"They could not find one complaint, one issue wrong, with any real patient," he told the Board of Medicine. "They're asking you to indict his entire practice based off two people that came in and lied about conditions."
Andrews also argued that a five-year suspension of Dorn's license would amount to a permanent revocation, as the physician's health has deteriorated in the years since the investigation began.
According to Andrews, Dorn's patient load "went down significantly" after the charges were filed against him. Walmart also told Dorn its pharmacy would not accept prescriptions written by the physician.
The 2019 complaint against Dorn was filed on the same day the health department filed a complaint against Gainesville-area doctor Justin Davis, who also was visited by an undercover investigator. An administrative law judge also found Davis did not commit wrongdoing.
"I have always had faith in the judgment of the Board of Medicine because these are practicing physicians and they see it from a physician point of view and, after all that testimony, I totally don't see how they could have reacted any other way," Dorn told the News Service.
Dara Kam reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250