State AG Moody Takes Aim at Challenges to Court Candidates
Attorney General Ashley Moody argues that the candidates do not have to meet a residency requirement until they are appointed, if they are ultimately selected by the governor.
December 15, 2022 at 01:46 PM
4 minute read
State and Local GovernmentAttorney General Ashley Moody is urging the Florida Supreme Court to reject challenges to the eligibility of six candidates for seats on revamped state appeals courts.
Moody late Tuesday filed documents at the Supreme Court disputing that the candidates are ineligible because they live outside the jurisdictions of the Fifth District Court of Appeal and the new Sixth District Court of Appeal. The attorney general argues the candidates do not have to meet a residency requirement until they are appointed, if they are ultimately selected by Gov. Ron DeSantis.
The challenges, filed last month at the Supreme Court, target candidates included on lists sent to DeSantis by the Fifth District Court of Appeal Judicial Nominating Commission and the Sixth District Court of Appeal Judicial Nominating Commission. In the documents Tuesday, Moody cited what is known as Article V of the Florida Constitution, which details the structure of the judiciary and the court system.
"The governor may appoint the person he considers most suitable for judicial office, but he must select from nominees selected by the JNCs [judicial nominating commissions]," lawyers in Moody's office wrote. "Excluding the possibility of the governor's even considering a worthy candidate who might otherwise meet the eligibility requirements in Article V … by the time of appointment would limit the governor's appointment options in a manner the constitutional text does not support."
Tuesday's filings were the latest developments in challenges filed by state Sen. Geraldine Thompson, D-Windermere, and Volusia County resident Whitney Boan.
Thompson contends that four of 18 candidates, including state Rep. Mike Beltran, R-Lithia, are ineligible for seats on the Sixth District Court of Appeal because they do not live within its jurisdiction. Boan contends that two of 15 candidates, including state Gaming Control Commission Chairman John MacIver, are not eligible for seats on the Fifth District Court of Appeal.
"Permitting individuals who reside outside the territorial jurisdiction of a district court of appeal to be nominated for positions on that court would violate the Florida Constitution and contradict this [Supreme] Court's stated goal of achieving proportional geographic representation," attorneys for Boan wrote last month in the Fifth District Court of Appeal case.
The Legislature this year approved a plan (HB 7027) that added the Sixth District Court of Appeal and revised the jurisdictions of the First District Court of Appeal, the Second District Court of Appeal and the Fifth District Court of Appeal. The changes are scheduled to take effect Jan. 1, with DeSantis appointing judges to fill vacant positions.
The Sixth District Court of Appeal, which will be based in Polk County, will hear cases from the Ninth, 10th and 20th judicial circuits, an area that includes Orange, Osceola, Hardee, Highlands, Polk, Charlotte, Collier, Glades, Hendry and Lee counties.
The redrawn Fifth District Court of Appeal, which will be based in Volusia County, will hear cases from the Fourth, Fifth, Seventh and 18th judicial circuits, an area that includes Duval, Nassau, Clay, Citrus, Hernando, Lake, Marion, Sumter, St. Johns, Putnam, Flagler, Volusia, Brevard and Seminole counties.
In addition to challenging the eligibility of Beltran, who lives in Hillsborough County, Thompson is targeting the Sixth District Court of Appeal candidacies of Leon County Circuit Judge Stephen Everett, Hillsborough County Circuit Judge Jared Smith and Danielle Brewer, a judge in the 12th Judicial Circuit, which is made up of Sarasota, Manatee and DeSoto counties.
In the Fifth District Court of Appeal case, Boan is challenging the eligibility of Palm Beach County Circuit Judge Paige Kilbane and MacIver, a Leon County resident.
The nominating commissions filed documents last week urging the Supreme Court to toss out the challenges. The filings said the candidates, if selected, could meet the residency requirements at the time the appointments take effect.
"The JNC [the Sixth District Court of Appeal Judicial Nominating Commission] asked each of the nominees if they would become residents of the Sixth DCA jurisdictional territory, and each of the nominees confirmed they would," one of the documents said. "The JNC thus fully complied with its obligations and this [Supreme] Court's direction in determining that the nominees were willing and able to satisfy the residential requirement."
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
COVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250