State AG Moody Takes Aim at Challenges to Court Candidates
Attorney General Ashley Moody argues that the candidates do not have to meet a residency requirement until they are appointed, if they are ultimately selected by the governor.
December 15, 2022 at 01:46 PM
4 minute read
State and Local GovernmentAttorney General Ashley Moody is urging the Florida Supreme Court to reject challenges to the eligibility of six candidates for seats on revamped state appeals courts.
Moody late Tuesday filed documents at the Supreme Court disputing that the candidates are ineligible because they live outside the jurisdictions of the Fifth District Court of Appeal and the new Sixth District Court of Appeal. The attorney general argues the candidates do not have to meet a residency requirement until they are appointed, if they are ultimately selected by Gov. Ron DeSantis.
The challenges, filed last month at the Supreme Court, target candidates included on lists sent to DeSantis by the Fifth District Court of Appeal Judicial Nominating Commission and the Sixth District Court of Appeal Judicial Nominating Commission. In the documents Tuesday, Moody cited what is known as Article V of the Florida Constitution, which details the structure of the judiciary and the court system.
"The governor may appoint the person he considers most suitable for judicial office, but he must select from nominees selected by the JNCs [judicial nominating commissions]," lawyers in Moody's office wrote. "Excluding the possibility of the governor's even considering a worthy candidate who might otherwise meet the eligibility requirements in Article V … by the time of appointment would limit the governor's appointment options in a manner the constitutional text does not support."
Tuesday's filings were the latest developments in challenges filed by state Sen. Geraldine Thompson, D-Windermere, and Volusia County resident Whitney Boan.
Thompson contends that four of 18 candidates, including state Rep. Mike Beltran, R-Lithia, are ineligible for seats on the Sixth District Court of Appeal because they do not live within its jurisdiction. Boan contends that two of 15 candidates, including state Gaming Control Commission Chairman John MacIver, are not eligible for seats on the Fifth District Court of Appeal.
"Permitting individuals who reside outside the territorial jurisdiction of a district court of appeal to be nominated for positions on that court would violate the Florida Constitution and contradict this [Supreme] Court's stated goal of achieving proportional geographic representation," attorneys for Boan wrote last month in the Fifth District Court of Appeal case.
The Legislature this year approved a plan (HB 7027) that added the Sixth District Court of Appeal and revised the jurisdictions of the First District Court of Appeal, the Second District Court of Appeal and the Fifth District Court of Appeal. The changes are scheduled to take effect Jan. 1, with DeSantis appointing judges to fill vacant positions.
The Sixth District Court of Appeal, which will be based in Polk County, will hear cases from the Ninth, 10th and 20th judicial circuits, an area that includes Orange, Osceola, Hardee, Highlands, Polk, Charlotte, Collier, Glades, Hendry and Lee counties.
The redrawn Fifth District Court of Appeal, which will be based in Volusia County, will hear cases from the Fourth, Fifth, Seventh and 18th judicial circuits, an area that includes Duval, Nassau, Clay, Citrus, Hernando, Lake, Marion, Sumter, St. Johns, Putnam, Flagler, Volusia, Brevard and Seminole counties.
In addition to challenging the eligibility of Beltran, who lives in Hillsborough County, Thompson is targeting the Sixth District Court of Appeal candidacies of Leon County Circuit Judge Stephen Everett, Hillsborough County Circuit Judge Jared Smith and Danielle Brewer, a judge in the 12th Judicial Circuit, which is made up of Sarasota, Manatee and DeSoto counties.
In the Fifth District Court of Appeal case, Boan is challenging the eligibility of Palm Beach County Circuit Judge Paige Kilbane and MacIver, a Leon County resident.
The nominating commissions filed documents last week urging the Supreme Court to toss out the challenges. The filings said the candidates, if selected, could meet the residency requirements at the time the appointments take effect.
"The JNC [the Sixth District Court of Appeal Judicial Nominating Commission] asked each of the nominees if they would become residents of the Sixth DCA jurisdictional territory, and each of the nominees confirmed they would," one of the documents said. "The JNC thus fully complied with its obligations and this [Supreme] Court's direction in determining that the nominees were willing and able to satisfy the residential requirement."
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250