London Law Firms Face Reckoning After 2022's 'Pay Scale Mess'
Many of the U.K.'s top law firms upped salaries for newly qualified lawyers to as much as $120,600 this year to narrow the gap with top U.S. firms in London.
December 28, 2022 at 10:59 AM
4 minute read
London's biggest law firms paid generously to secure the brightest young recruits they could this year. Meeting those salary pledges next year will be a lot tougher with revenues from dealmaking expected to slow dramatically.
Many of the U.K.'s top law firms upped salaries for newly qualified lawyers to as much as £100,000 ($120,600) this year to narrow the gap with top U.S. firms in London. But the value of initial public offerings in the U.K. capital, a key source of cash for law firms which advise on these deals, fell in the first half of 2022 to the lowest since 2008. With the U.K. already on the brink of recession, a reckoning of sorts may be coming.
London's top firms and their largest U.S. rivals made "a real mess of the pay scales," Nigel Knowles, chief executive officer of law firm DWF Group, said in an interview. DWF instead decided to offer junior lawyers shares in the company this year, admittedly not an option for the majority of firms that aren't listed.
"If you're heavily reliant on corporate finance, you've not had the sort of work this year that you've had previously so that means that when people leave, you probably won't replace them," said Knowles.
Macfarlanes, one of the London firms that lifted salaries to match better-paying local firms, declined to comment. The five London-based firms that make up the so-called Magic Circle — Clifford Chance, Allen & Overy, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Linklaters, and Slaughter and May — either declined to comment or respond to requests for comment.
Finding the revenue to cover the spike in salaries without squeezing profitability will be tough, says Nick Roome, head of KPMG legal services in the U.K. One way firms can try and ease the cash crunch is to slim down their payroll and trade up to more lucrative clients, he says.
"They're probably going to do less, narrow their business models towards the super premium activity that can support that sort of cost base," Roome said. "You are going to see some areas of law that they'll decide to stop doing."
That may in turn provide voids other law firms can fill. Top U.S. law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom sees the slowdown in dealmaking as a chance to expand across Europe, says Pranav Trivedi, a partner and head of Skadden's London office.
Global dealmaking fell to $3.5 trillion in 2022, down by almost a third from last year's record activity, due to a cocktail of inflation, higher interest rates and geopolitical woes. Law firms predict a further slowdown in mergers and acquisitions and IPOs next year.
Still, investors will always be looking for distressed assets in a downturn they can snap up cheaply, providing a boon to law firms. Kon Asimacopoulos, a restructuring partner at Kirkland & Ellis in London, says that's just getting started, and will peak in the first half of 2023.
That's part of how law firms will increasingly focus on recession-proof practice areas in 2023. Litigation, insurance, arbitration and restructuring usually see an increase in activity when the mood turns sour — and London is viewed as the center of global arbitration.
Kirkland is already seeing a "material uptick" from distressed companies calling on lawyers to help them restructure, according to Asimacopoulos.
Meanwhile in London, Skadden has started hiring in insurance and regulatory work, as well as for litigation and arbitration. And Manchester-based DWF just completed its acquisition of Whitelaw Twining Law, which specializes in insurance litigation this month.
Multinationals will also be under pressure to cut costs by reducing the number of firms they retain. Companies that have recently refreshed their legal roster have tended to reduce the number of law firms while expecting greater reach from those they keep, said Knowles.
"You've either got to be super niche or you've got to be global," Knowles said.
Irina Anghel reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Delray Beach Financial Adviser Indicted in Alleged Illegal Tax Shelter Scheme
McGlinchey Opens Third Florida Office in Tampa, Hopes to Tap Region's Talent
2 minute readBuy-Now-Pay-Later Company Affirm Hit With Data Breach Class Action After Cyberattack on Banking Partner
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
- 2GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
- 3Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
- 4'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 5The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250