Tax Havens Obscured $1.4T of Foreign Investment in China
Chinese companies tend to use tax havens less as a tax avoidance mechanism and more as a means to circumvent Chinese government restrictions on foreign ownership in some sectors.
January 05, 2023 at 02:44 PM
4 minute read
U.S. and European investment into mainland China has largely been channeled through offshore vehicles set up by Chinese companies in tax havens, according to newly published research, suggesting that foreign exposure to Chinese assets is much larger than recorded by official statistics.
U.S. and European investors' holdings of equities and bonds issued by offshore vehicles controlled by Chinese companies such as Alibaba Group Holding and Tencent Holdings reached $1.4 trillion at the end of 2020, according to new estimates from the Global Capital Allocation Project based at Columbia and Stanford universities.
That was almost three times the amount investors from those countries held directly in companies registered in China.
The data shows the depth of the financial links between the world's second-largest economy and the major developed economies, making any decoupling a challenging prospect. Those links also mean that foreign companies are more exposed to China than previously thought, and U.S. and European governments will need to pay greater attention to potential risks from investment in Chinese companies routed through these offshore entities, the researchers suggested.
"The sums involved, the involvement of retail investors and mutual funds, and the shaky shareholder rights these structures imply, clearly point to a need for regulation," the researchers said.
The data also mean efforts to regulate global tax havens will need to take into account the interests of Chinese companies. The amount Chinese-controlled offshore entities raised from U.S. and European investors almost tripled from 2016 to 2020, according to the Project.
"There has been a lot of attention and policy effort on regulating tax havens' activities. Our work points to the growing importance of China in these jurisdictions, and this is likely to make global coordination on policy efforts more important but also more difficult to achieve," the researchers said.
Chinese companies tend to use tax havens less as a tax avoidance mechanism and more as a means to circumvent Chinese government restrictions on foreign ownership in some sectors, and because foreign investors often see foreign courts as more reliable than China's, the researchers said.
The data is the only publicly available resource which "looks through" investment in companies registered in tax havens to where the invested capital is ultimately used. Most official statistics look at investment by residency, counting an investment in a Chinese-controlled Cayman Islands company as an investment in the Cayman Islands.
The project's researchers found that U.S. ownership of stocks and bonds issued by Chinese companies was $922 billion higher at the end of 2020 than the U.S. Treasury figures for investment in China. "Under this more comprehensive view, U.S. residents' portfolios were much more exposed to China up to 2020, leaving them exposed to the subsequent tumble in Chinese tech stocks," the researchers said.
The research also has implications for global financial balances. China is recorded in official statistics as a large net creditor to the rest of world in part because its companies have relatively few liabilities to overseas investors. China's creditor position is "much smaller" when the liabilities of Chinese-controlled companies registered outside China are included, the researchers said.
The project's data covers investment from residents in the U.S., the euro area, the UK, Canada, Switzerland, Norway, Denmark and Sweden. It is lagging due to the time required to work out the ultimate controllers of companies registered in tax havens.
The value of foreign investors' holdings of Chinese stocks and bonds has almost certainly fallen since the end of 2020, as increased regulation and crackdowns on tech companies, strict pandemic controls and a property sector slump led many foreign buyers to sell their holdings. The value of all foreign holdings of mainland stocks and bonds is down almost 20% from the peak at the end of 2021, according to the latest data from the People's Bank of China.
"We'd expect losses to have occurred and the positions to have shrunk due to lower stock prices for many Chinese tech companies, like Alibaba and Tencent. Even at these lower valuation levels, positions including Chinese companies' offshore affiliates are going to be higher than positions that only include investments in China-resident entities," said the researchers.
Despite the market volatility, China has continued to make efforts to further open its onshore bond market to foreign investors and passed a new derivatives law which makes it easier to hedge investments. "It remains to be seen whether foreign investors will trust these policies and renter the market," the researchers said.
Tom Hancock and Spe Chen report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
3 minute readUS Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Trending Stories
- 1On The Move: Energy Infrastructure Pro Joins Moore & Van Allen, Adams & Reese Changes Atlanta Leadership
- 2Miami Attorneys Secure $4M Settlement Despite Insurance Limits
- 3NY Judge Admonished Over Contributions to Progressive Political Causes
- 4Legaltech Rundown: Alexi Launches an AI Litigation Tool, Hotshot Announces Private Equity Practice Courses, and More
- 56-48. It’s Comp Time Again: How To Crush Your Comp Memo
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250