![(Photo: Adobe Stock)](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2023/01/AdobeStock_408468741-767x633-1.jpg)
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in DeSantis Administration Crosshairs
Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker ruled that Gov. Ron DeSantis' effort didn't violate his court order that blocked parts of a state law restricting how race-related concepts can be taught.
January 17, 2023 at 11:34 AM
3 minute read
Gov. Ron DeSantis' latest attempt to combat "trendy ideology" in higher education got the go-ahead from a federal judge last week.
Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker ruled Friday that the administration's effort didn't violate his court order that blocked parts of a state law restricting how race-related concepts can be taught.
The legal wrangling last week stemmed from a memo Chris Spencer, head of DeSantis' Office of Policy and Budget, sent to Florida's top education officials on Dec. 28. Spencer directed the leaders of the state college and university systems to require all institutions to "provide a comprehensive list of all staff, programs and campus activities related to diversity, equity and inclusion and critical race theory."
Spencer's memo pointed to the controversial 2022 law, which DeSantis dubbed the "Stop Wrongs To Our Kids and Employees Act," or "Stop WOKE Act." The law enumerates various race-related concepts and says it would constitute discrimination if students are subjected to instruction that "espouses, promotes, advances, inculcates or compels" them to believe the concepts.
Plaintiffs challenging the law, who include university professors and students, last week accused DeSantis' administration of failing to comply with a preliminary injunction preventing enforcement of the measure.
Walker in November granted the injunction preventing the state from enforcing the law, calling it "positively dystopian."
In a "motion to compel" filed Wednesday, the plaintiffs argued that "compliance with" Spencer's memo "would violate the preliminary injunction order."
"The purpose behind the [Spencer] executive memorandum's direction to collect information about instructors' activities is clearly to enforce the unconstitutional provisions of the Stop W.O.K.E. Act," the plaintiffs' lawyers wrote.
But, siding with the state, Walker on Thursday said the DeSantis administration hadn't done anything wrong.
"Although this court would not hesitate to compel compliance with its preliminary injunction, this court finds there has been no violation of the injunction at this time," he wrote.
Walker's decision came the same day lawyers representing the state filed a response to the plaintiffs' request, arguing that the information sought through Spencer's memo is part of the governor's annual budgeting process.
"Nothing in this court's command that defendants must refrain from enforcing the Individual Freedom Act immunizes state universities from providing the governor's office with basic information about the programs and activities the state is funding," the response said.
The state has appealed Walker's preliminary injunction and has asked the Atlanta-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit to allow the restrictions to be in effect while the legal battle continues.
Ryan Dailey reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Trump Administration Faces Lawsuit Over USAID Stop-Work Orders Trump Administration Faces Lawsuit Over USAID Stop-Work Orders](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/16/79/000bb9704808a73fcde73947ecfd/trump-oval-office-767x633.jpg)
![Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/28/90/106b497d4c2abf86218e4414ada2/attorney-fees-767x633.jpg)
Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute read![US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/10/Trump-Cannon-767x633.jpg)
US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute read![New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/98/ca/4dd6a947421bbc9c53aad7b8dd51/allstate-insurance-2-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1We Must Uphold the Rights of Immigrant Students
- 2Orrick Picks Up 13-Lawyer Tech, VC Group From Gunderson Dettmer
- 3How Alzheimer’s and Other Cognitive Diseases Affect Guardianship, POAs and Estate Planning
- 4How Lower Courts Are Interpreting Justices' Decision in 'Muldrow v. City of St. Louis'
- 5Phantom Income/Retained Earnings and the Potential for Inflated Support
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250