Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in DeSantis Administration Crosshairs
Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker ruled that Gov. Ron DeSantis' effort didn't violate his court order that blocked parts of a state law restricting how race-related concepts can be taught.
January 17, 2023 at 11:34 AM
3 minute read
Gov. Ron DeSantis' latest attempt to combat "trendy ideology" in higher education got the go-ahead from a federal judge last week.
Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker ruled Friday that the administration's effort didn't violate his court order that blocked parts of a state law restricting how race-related concepts can be taught.
The legal wrangling last week stemmed from a memo Chris Spencer, head of DeSantis' Office of Policy and Budget, sent to Florida's top education officials on Dec. 28. Spencer directed the leaders of the state college and university systems to require all institutions to "provide a comprehensive list of all staff, programs and campus activities related to diversity, equity and inclusion and critical race theory."
Spencer's memo pointed to the controversial 2022 law, which DeSantis dubbed the "Stop Wrongs To Our Kids and Employees Act," or "Stop WOKE Act." The law enumerates various race-related concepts and says it would constitute discrimination if students are subjected to instruction that "espouses, promotes, advances, inculcates or compels" them to believe the concepts.
Plaintiffs challenging the law, who include university professors and students, last week accused DeSantis' administration of failing to comply with a preliminary injunction preventing enforcement of the measure.
Walker in November granted the injunction preventing the state from enforcing the law, calling it "positively dystopian."
In a "motion to compel" filed Wednesday, the plaintiffs argued that "compliance with" Spencer's memo "would violate the preliminary injunction order."
"The purpose behind the [Spencer] executive memorandum's direction to collect information about instructors' activities is clearly to enforce the unconstitutional provisions of the Stop W.O.K.E. Act," the plaintiffs' lawyers wrote.
But, siding with the state, Walker on Thursday said the DeSantis administration hadn't done anything wrong.
"Although this court would not hesitate to compel compliance with its preliminary injunction, this court finds there has been no violation of the injunction at this time," he wrote.
Walker's decision came the same day lawyers representing the state filed a response to the plaintiffs' request, arguing that the information sought through Spencer's memo is part of the governor's annual budgeting process.
"Nothing in this court's command that defendants must refrain from enforcing the Individual Freedom Act immunizes state universities from providing the governor's office with basic information about the programs and activities the state is funding," the response said.
The state has appealed Walker's preliminary injunction and has asked the Atlanta-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit to allow the restrictions to be in effect while the legal battle continues.
Ryan Dailey reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250