State Judge Refuses to Dismiss DeSantis Migrant Flights Case
Gov. Ron DeSantis, a potential 2024 Republican presidential candidate, has frequently criticizes federal immigration policies.
January 17, 2023 at 11:53 AM
3 minute read
A Leon County circuit judge rejected a request by Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration to dismiss a lawsuit filed after the state flew about 50 migrants from Texas to Massachusetts in September.
Judge John Cooper's ruling set the stage for a full hearing in the constitutional challenge filed by state Sen. Jason Pizzo, D-North Miami Beach. The flights to Martha's Vineyard drew national attention and came as DeSantis, a potential 2024 Republican presidential candidate, frequently criticizes federal immigration policies.
The lawsuit deals with the interplay of the state budget and substantive laws. It contends that part of this year's budget used to pay for the flights violated the Florida Constitution because it created a new program and changed laws about issues such as contracting.
"I deny the defendants' motion to dismiss on the grounds that I think we need to just hear out these issues." Cooper said after a roughly two-hour hearing.
Lawmakers included $12 million in the budget for the Department of Transportation to carry out a "program to facilitate the transport of unauthorized aliens from this state." The DeSantis administration used $615,000 of that money to pay Vertol Systems Co. Inc. to transport two planeloads of migrants on Sept. 14 from San Antonio, Texas, to Martha's Vineyard, with a stop in the Northwest Florida community of Crestview.
The budget fine print included additional details, such as saying the Department of Transportation, "may, upon the receipt of at least two quotes, negotiate and enter into contracts with private parties." The lawsuit contends the section of the budget created a program and dealt with other issues that, under the Constitution, would need to be handled through substantive laws.
But Nicholas Meros, a deputy general counsel for DeSantis, disputed during Friday's hearing that the budget created a new program or changed state laws.
Meros said an immigration-enforcement law (SB 1808) passed last year allowed such flights and the budget details were "simply, 'here's how you spend the money.'"
"It's not creating a new program," Meros said. "It's not adding things onto a program."
The lawsuit named as defendants DeSantis, the Department of Transportation and state Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis. While Cooper allowed it to move forward against DeSantis and the department, he dismissed Patronis from the case, saying the CFO only "cut the check."
Cooper has scheduled a Jan. 30 final hearing in the case.
While the state spent $615,000 on the September flights, three additional Vertol purchase orders of $950,000 each are listed on a state contracting website for "relocation services."
Mark Herron, an attorney for Pizzo, pointed Friday to the possibility of more flights as the case continues.
"The governor has said, 'I intend to spend the entire $12 million,' and the CFO has recently just said, 'I am going to sign these checks because we are going to stick it to the federal government,'" Herron told reporters after Friday's hearing.
Meros declined to comment as he left the courtroom.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida. NSOF Assignment Manager Tom Urban contributed to this report.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250