Florida Lawmakers Back Changes in Student-Athlete Pay Law
A proposal would allow colleges and universities to steer endorsement deals and other compensation opportunities toward student-athletes.
January 18, 2023 at 12:35 PM
3 minute read
State and Local GovernmentA proposal began moving forward Tuesday in the Florida House that would allow colleges and universities to steer endorsement deals and other compensation opportunities toward student-athletes.
The House Postsecondary Education & Workforce Subcommittee unanimously approved the bill (HB 99). The measure would make a significant change to a law, known as a name, image and likeness law, that allows college athletes to get paid.
The Legislature passed the law in 2020, and it went into effect in July 2021. Under the law, colleges and universities and their employees are barred from causing "compensation to be directed" to student-athletes.
The proposal filed for the 2023 legislative session would eliminate that restriction.
Florida was one of six states that enacted athlete-pay laws that forbid schools and booster organizations from getting involved in athletes securing deals, a House staff analysis said.
"A female softball player or soccer player here at Florida State [University], if there was a business down the street and they wanted to connect and do an endorsement, do a sponsorship or something for that athlete, they wouldn't be able to do that by reaching out to the university, boosters or anyone," said Rep. Chip LaMarca, a Lighthouse Point Republican who sponsored the 2020 law and is sponsoring the new proposal. "This [bill] would allow them to do that."
Some proponents of changing the law have pointed to disparities between Florida and other states in how much colleges and universities can be involved.
Florida State University men's basketball coach Leonard Hamilton during a September meeting of the school's booster program described Florida as being in a "challenging" position when competing for recruits against schools in other states.
"From a state of Florida standpoint, some things we can't say. In the state of Florida, I'm not really able to go out and talk to kids about NIL [name, image and likeness]," Hamilton said.
Members of the House panel praised the proposed changes Tuesday.
Rep. Fred Hawkins, R-St. Cloud, described the measure as bringing Florida more in line with what other states permit.
"As Florida, we want to be a leader. And any time that we fall short with something that other states are adopting, we have to relook at [it]. So, I'm glad you brought this," Hawkins said.
The House panel removed part of the bill that would have provided liability protections for schools and coaches.
That part of the bill would have shielded coaches and schools from liability related to "any damages to an intercollegiate athlete's ability to earn compensation" for their name, image or likeness "resulting from decisions and actions routinely taken in the course of intercollegiate athletics."
LaMarca said the liability-shield provision was removed because colleges and universities are governmental entities that have "sovereign immunity."
Changes to the bill Tuesday also would allow colleges and universities to offer services such as contract review, tax preparation and financial adviser services for student-athletes, so long as the services are provided free of charge to athletes.
Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, praised the part of the measure that would provide the financial-management services.
"Especially when we have such high expectations for folks who are so young and just starting their careers, it can also be very overwhelming. They can also be taken advantage of," Eskamani said.
A Senate version of the proposal (SB 200) was filed Tuesday by Sen. Travis Hutson, R-St. Augustine.
Ryan Dailey reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readAs Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250