Jes Staley 'Personally Observed' Epstein's Abuse, Woman Suing JPMorgan Claims
Jes Staley bragged within JPMorgan about Jeffrey Epstein's value to the bank, according to a complaint.
January 19, 2023 at 01:22 PM
4 minute read
Criminal LawA woman suing JPMorgan Chase & Co. for facilitating her sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein is claiming Jes Staley "personally observed" that abuse when he was the bank's head of private wealth.
The woman, who is suing as Jane Doe 1 in a proposed class action against the largest U.S. bank, made new allegations about Staley's knowledge of Epstein's abuse in an amended complaint filed late Friday in Manhattan federal court.
According to the complaint, Staley frequently visited Epstein's properties, including his New York townhouse massage room, a "stash house" apartment on Manhattan's Upper East Side and his U.S. Virgin Islands estate. The then-JPMorgan executive allegedly met many of Epstein's trafficking victims and "personally observed the sexual abuse of young women, including Jane Doe 1."
JPMorgan on Tuesday declined to comment on the amended complaint.
Staley, who is not named as a defendant in the suit, has consistently denied knowledge of Epstein's abuse. A lawyer for Staley declined to comment on Tuesday.
'Actual Knowledge'
The new allegations seek to bolster the argument that JPMorgan was aware of Epstein's conduct but nonetheless turned a blind eye. The bank has moved to dismiss the suit in part by arguing that it fails to show the bank knew about Epstein's abuse.
"As a result of Staley's direct and actual knowledge of Epstein's sex-trafficking venture, JP Morgan had direct and actual knowledge of Epstein's sex-trafficking venture," the amended complaint alleges.
Staley left JPMorgan in 2013 and joined Barclays Plc as chief executive officer a few years later. He stepped down from that role in 2021 following a U.K. regulatory probe into his relationship with Epstein.
The amended complaint more specifically alleges that JPMorgan was aware that Epstein used his accounts at the bank to settle sexual abuse lawsuits and for expenses related to "apparent criminal activity."
"To put it plainly, Epstein needed a bank that knew he was engaging in illegal activity and did not care, which Epstein had in JP Morgan," the complaint states.
Staley bragged within JPMorgan about Epstein's value to the bank, according to the complaint, and benefited from the relationship with "massages, private jet flights with victims and co-conspirators."
Adult Survivors Act
The amended complaint also alleges top-level executives at JPMorgan, including Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon, were aware of Epstein's 2006 Florida arrest and "made the decision to monitor" news about him. Some executives allegedly lobbied to have the bank cut ties with Epstein after allegations about his sex trafficking surfaced publicly but were overruled until 2013, when the bank finally ended its relationship with the financier.
Lawsuits against both JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank, which became Epstein's main bank after 2013, were filed separately in November by Jane Doe 1, who is represented by David Boies. The suits claim the banks knowingly benefited and received things of value for assisting and supporting Epstein's sex-trafficking scheme.
Like JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank has also sought dismissal of the claims, denying knowledge of Epstein's conduct. JPMorgan further argues the claims against it, which relate to events between 1998 and 2013, are barred by the statute of limitations. The plaintiffs are suing under New York's Adult Survivors Act, which temporarily lifts the time limit for sexual assault claims, but both banks say the law does not apply to them.
Epstein was found dead in his U.S. jail cell in 2019, after being charged with sex-trafficking. His connections to U.S. and British elites led to career downfalls for a number of prominent Wall Street names.
The case is Jane Doe 1 v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, 22-cv-10019, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
Ava Benny-Morrison reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Judge Cannon Says She Has No Relationship With Trump and Won't Step Down From Attempted Assassination Case
Roy Black, 79, Taught Me About ChatGPT and 'Jury Magic'
Judge OKs 'Oversized' Brief Defending Trump Election Interference Prosecution
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 2Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 3The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 4November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 5Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250